Understanding the Importance of "symbolic Interaction Stigma"

How Expectations about the Reactions of Others Adds to the Burden of Mental Illness Stigma

Bruce G. Link, Jennifer Wells, Jo C. Phelan, Larry Yang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Important components of stigma include imagining what others might think of a stigmatized status, anticipating what might transpire in an interaction with others, and rehearsing what one might do if something untoward occurs. These imagined relations are here called symbolic interaction stigma and can have an impact even if the internalization of negative stereotypes fails to occur. Concepts and measures that capture symbolic interaction stigma are introduced, and a preliminary assessment of their impact is provided. Method: Four self-report measures of symbolic interaction stigma (perceived devaluation discrimination, anticipation of rejection, stigma consciousness, and concern with staying in) were developed or adapted and administered to a sample of individuals who have experienced mental illness (N = 65). Regression analyses examined whether forms of symbolic interaction stigma were associated with withdrawal, self-esteem, and isolation from relatives independent of measures of internalization of stigma and rejection experiences. Results: As evidenced by scores on 4 distinct measures, symbolic interaction stigma was relatively common in the sample, somewhat more common than the internalization of stigma. In addition, measures of symbolic interaction stigma were significantly associated with withdrawal, self-esteem, and isolation from relatives even when a measure of the internalization of stigma was statistically controlled. Conclusion: The study suggests the potential importance of considering symbolic interaction forms of stigma in understanding and addressing stigma and its consequences. Being aware of symbolic interaction stigma could be useful in enhancing rehabilitation goals if an approach to counteracting the negative effects of these aspects of stigma can be developed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)117-124
Number of pages8
JournalPsychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Cost of Illness
Self Concept
Consciousness
Self Report
Rehabilitation
Regression Analysis
Rejection (Psychology)
Discrimination (Psychology)

Keywords

  • isolation
  • rejection
  • stigma
  • symbolic interaction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Professions (miscellaneous)
  • Rehabilitation
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Understanding the Importance of "symbolic Interaction Stigma" : How Expectations about the Reactions of Others Adds to the Burden of Mental Illness Stigma. / Link, Bruce G.; Wells, Jennifer; Phelan, Jo C.; Yang, Larry.

In: Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, Vol. 38, No. 2, 01.06.2015, p. 117-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e7b09ba796734c89b9c2dac808b4a91b,
title = "Understanding the Importance of {"}symbolic Interaction Stigma{"}: How Expectations about the Reactions of Others Adds to the Burden of Mental Illness Stigma",
abstract = "Objective: Important components of stigma include imagining what others might think of a stigmatized status, anticipating what might transpire in an interaction with others, and rehearsing what one might do if something untoward occurs. These imagined relations are here called symbolic interaction stigma and can have an impact even if the internalization of negative stereotypes fails to occur. Concepts and measures that capture symbolic interaction stigma are introduced, and a preliminary assessment of their impact is provided. Method: Four self-report measures of symbolic interaction stigma (perceived devaluation discrimination, anticipation of rejection, stigma consciousness, and concern with staying in) were developed or adapted and administered to a sample of individuals who have experienced mental illness (N = 65). Regression analyses examined whether forms of symbolic interaction stigma were associated with withdrawal, self-esteem, and isolation from relatives independent of measures of internalization of stigma and rejection experiences. Results: As evidenced by scores on 4 distinct measures, symbolic interaction stigma was relatively common in the sample, somewhat more common than the internalization of stigma. In addition, measures of symbolic interaction stigma were significantly associated with withdrawal, self-esteem, and isolation from relatives even when a measure of the internalization of stigma was statistically controlled. Conclusion: The study suggests the potential importance of considering symbolic interaction forms of stigma in understanding and addressing stigma and its consequences. Being aware of symbolic interaction stigma could be useful in enhancing rehabilitation goals if an approach to counteracting the negative effects of these aspects of stigma can be developed.",
keywords = "isolation, rejection, stigma, symbolic interaction",
author = "Link, {Bruce G.} and Jennifer Wells and Phelan, {Jo C.} and Larry Yang",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/prj0000142",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "117--124",
journal = "Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal",
issn = "1095-158X",
publisher = "Boston University",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding the Importance of "symbolic Interaction Stigma"

T2 - How Expectations about the Reactions of Others Adds to the Burden of Mental Illness Stigma

AU - Link, Bruce G.

AU - Wells, Jennifer

AU - Phelan, Jo C.

AU - Yang, Larry

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Objective: Important components of stigma include imagining what others might think of a stigmatized status, anticipating what might transpire in an interaction with others, and rehearsing what one might do if something untoward occurs. These imagined relations are here called symbolic interaction stigma and can have an impact even if the internalization of negative stereotypes fails to occur. Concepts and measures that capture symbolic interaction stigma are introduced, and a preliminary assessment of their impact is provided. Method: Four self-report measures of symbolic interaction stigma (perceived devaluation discrimination, anticipation of rejection, stigma consciousness, and concern with staying in) were developed or adapted and administered to a sample of individuals who have experienced mental illness (N = 65). Regression analyses examined whether forms of symbolic interaction stigma were associated with withdrawal, self-esteem, and isolation from relatives independent of measures of internalization of stigma and rejection experiences. Results: As evidenced by scores on 4 distinct measures, symbolic interaction stigma was relatively common in the sample, somewhat more common than the internalization of stigma. In addition, measures of symbolic interaction stigma were significantly associated with withdrawal, self-esteem, and isolation from relatives even when a measure of the internalization of stigma was statistically controlled. Conclusion: The study suggests the potential importance of considering symbolic interaction forms of stigma in understanding and addressing stigma and its consequences. Being aware of symbolic interaction stigma could be useful in enhancing rehabilitation goals if an approach to counteracting the negative effects of these aspects of stigma can be developed.

AB - Objective: Important components of stigma include imagining what others might think of a stigmatized status, anticipating what might transpire in an interaction with others, and rehearsing what one might do if something untoward occurs. These imagined relations are here called symbolic interaction stigma and can have an impact even if the internalization of negative stereotypes fails to occur. Concepts and measures that capture symbolic interaction stigma are introduced, and a preliminary assessment of their impact is provided. Method: Four self-report measures of symbolic interaction stigma (perceived devaluation discrimination, anticipation of rejection, stigma consciousness, and concern with staying in) were developed or adapted and administered to a sample of individuals who have experienced mental illness (N = 65). Regression analyses examined whether forms of symbolic interaction stigma were associated with withdrawal, self-esteem, and isolation from relatives independent of measures of internalization of stigma and rejection experiences. Results: As evidenced by scores on 4 distinct measures, symbolic interaction stigma was relatively common in the sample, somewhat more common than the internalization of stigma. In addition, measures of symbolic interaction stigma were significantly associated with withdrawal, self-esteem, and isolation from relatives even when a measure of the internalization of stigma was statistically controlled. Conclusion: The study suggests the potential importance of considering symbolic interaction forms of stigma in understanding and addressing stigma and its consequences. Being aware of symbolic interaction stigma could be useful in enhancing rehabilitation goals if an approach to counteracting the negative effects of these aspects of stigma can be developed.

KW - isolation

KW - rejection

KW - stigma

KW - symbolic interaction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945921783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945921783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/prj0000142

DO - 10.1037/prj0000142

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 117

EP - 124

JO - Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

JF - Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

SN - 1095-158X

IS - 2

ER -