Understanding Self-Control as a Whole vs. Part Dynamic

Kentaro Fujita, Jessica J. Carnevale, Yaacov Trope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although dual-process or divided-mind models of self-control dominate the literature, they suffer from empirical and conceptual challenges. We propose an alternative approach, suggesting that self-control can be characterized by a fragmented part versus integrated whole dynamic. Whereas responses to events derived from fragmented parts of the mind undermine self-control, responses to events derived from integrated wholes enhance self-control. We review empirical evidence from psychology and related disciplines that support this model. We, moreover, discuss the implications of this work for psychology, neuroscience, economics, and philosophy. In particular, we highlight how this model addresses many of the conceptual and empirical short-comings of divided-mind models. We suggest that understanding self-control as the interplay between fragmented parts versus integrated wholes, moreover, provides novel insights and testable new hypotheses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-296
Number of pages14
JournalNeuroethics
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Construal level theory
  • Delay of gratification
  • Self-control
  • Self-governance
  • Self-regulation
  • Willpower

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Health Policy
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this