Understanding Self-Control as a Whole vs. Part Dynamic

Kentaro Fujita, Jessica J. Carnevale, Yaacov Trope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although dual-process or divided-mind models of self-control dominate the literature, they suffer from empirical and conceptual challenges. We propose an alternative approach, suggesting that self-control can be characterized by a fragmented part versus integrated whole dynamic. Whereas responses to events derived from fragmented parts of the mind undermine self-control, responses to events derived from integrated wholes enhance self-control. We review empirical evidence from psychology and related disciplines that support this model. We, moreover, discuss the implications of this work for psychology, neuroscience, economics, and philosophy. In particular, we highlight how this model addresses many of the conceptual and empirical short-comings of divided-mind models. We suggest that understanding self-control as the interplay between fragmented parts versus integrated wholes, moreover, provides novel insights and testable new hypotheses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalNeuroethics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Feb 23 2016

Fingerprint

Psychology
Neurosciences
Economics
Self-Control

Keywords

  • Construal level theory
  • Delay of gratification
  • Self-control
  • Self-governance
  • Self-regulation
  • Willpower

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Understanding Self-Control as a Whole vs. Part Dynamic. / Fujita, Kentaro; Carnevale, Jessica J.; Trope, Yaacov.

In: Neuroethics, 23.02.2016, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fujita, Kentaro ; Carnevale, Jessica J. ; Trope, Yaacov. / Understanding Self-Control as a Whole vs. Part Dynamic. In: Neuroethics. 2016 ; pp. 1-14.
@article{fa16f415f23749e5b1dd2e14c8c3bcc1,
title = "Understanding Self-Control as a Whole vs. Part Dynamic",
abstract = "Although dual-process or divided-mind models of self-control dominate the literature, they suffer from empirical and conceptual challenges. We propose an alternative approach, suggesting that self-control can be characterized by a fragmented part versus integrated whole dynamic. Whereas responses to events derived from fragmented parts of the mind undermine self-control, responses to events derived from integrated wholes enhance self-control. We review empirical evidence from psychology and related disciplines that support this model. We, moreover, discuss the implications of this work for psychology, neuroscience, economics, and philosophy. In particular, we highlight how this model addresses many of the conceptual and empirical short-comings of divided-mind models. We suggest that understanding self-control as the interplay between fragmented parts versus integrated wholes, moreover, provides novel insights and testable new hypotheses.",
keywords = "Construal level theory, Delay of gratification, Self-control, Self-governance, Self-regulation, Willpower",
author = "Kentaro Fujita and Carnevale, {Jessica J.} and Yaacov Trope",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1007/s12152-016-9250-2",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Neuroethics",
issn = "1874-5490",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding Self-Control as a Whole vs. Part Dynamic

AU - Fujita, Kentaro

AU - Carnevale, Jessica J.

AU - Trope, Yaacov

PY - 2016/2/23

Y1 - 2016/2/23

N2 - Although dual-process or divided-mind models of self-control dominate the literature, they suffer from empirical and conceptual challenges. We propose an alternative approach, suggesting that self-control can be characterized by a fragmented part versus integrated whole dynamic. Whereas responses to events derived from fragmented parts of the mind undermine self-control, responses to events derived from integrated wholes enhance self-control. We review empirical evidence from psychology and related disciplines that support this model. We, moreover, discuss the implications of this work for psychology, neuroscience, economics, and philosophy. In particular, we highlight how this model addresses many of the conceptual and empirical short-comings of divided-mind models. We suggest that understanding self-control as the interplay between fragmented parts versus integrated wholes, moreover, provides novel insights and testable new hypotheses.

AB - Although dual-process or divided-mind models of self-control dominate the literature, they suffer from empirical and conceptual challenges. We propose an alternative approach, suggesting that self-control can be characterized by a fragmented part versus integrated whole dynamic. Whereas responses to events derived from fragmented parts of the mind undermine self-control, responses to events derived from integrated wholes enhance self-control. We review empirical evidence from psychology and related disciplines that support this model. We, moreover, discuss the implications of this work for psychology, neuroscience, economics, and philosophy. In particular, we highlight how this model addresses many of the conceptual and empirical short-comings of divided-mind models. We suggest that understanding self-control as the interplay between fragmented parts versus integrated wholes, moreover, provides novel insights and testable new hypotheses.

KW - Construal level theory

KW - Delay of gratification

KW - Self-control

KW - Self-governance

KW - Self-regulation

KW - Willpower

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959077306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959077306&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12152-016-9250-2

DO - 10.1007/s12152-016-9250-2

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84959077306

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Neuroethics

JF - Neuroethics

SN - 1874-5490

ER -