Uncertainty in Category-Based Induction: When Do People Integrate Across Categories?

Gregory L. Murphy, Brian H. Ross

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two experiments investigated how people perform category-based induction for items that have uncertain categorization. Whereas normative considerations suggest that people should consider multiple relevant categories, much past research has argued that people focus on only the most likely category. A new method is introduced in which responses on individual trials can be classified as using single or multiple categories, an improvement on past methods that relied on null effects as evidence for single-category use. Experiment 1 found that people did use multiple categories when the most likely category gave an ambiguous induction but that few people did so when it gave an unambiguous induction. Experiment 2 suggested that the reluctance to use multiple categories arose from a cognitive shortcut, in which only one source of information is consulted. The experiments revealed significant individual differences, suggesting that use of multiple categories is one of a number of strategies that can be used rather than being the basis for most category-based induction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-276
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

induction
Uncertainty
uncertainty
Individuality
Research
experiment
Induction
source of information
Experiment

Keywords

  • categorization
  • category-based induction
  • concepts
  • reasoning
  • uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Uncertainty in Category-Based Induction : When Do People Integrate Across Categories? / Murphy, Gregory L.; Ross, Brian H.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, Vol. 36, No. 2, 03.2010, p. 263-276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b1f00731ca3b4cb2adcd2480b6f09ed5,
title = "Uncertainty in Category-Based Induction: When Do People Integrate Across Categories?",
abstract = "Two experiments investigated how people perform category-based induction for items that have uncertain categorization. Whereas normative considerations suggest that people should consider multiple relevant categories, much past research has argued that people focus on only the most likely category. A new method is introduced in which responses on individual trials can be classified as using single or multiple categories, an improvement on past methods that relied on null effects as evidence for single-category use. Experiment 1 found that people did use multiple categories when the most likely category gave an ambiguous induction but that few people did so when it gave an unambiguous induction. Experiment 2 suggested that the reluctance to use multiple categories arose from a cognitive shortcut, in which only one source of information is consulted. The experiments revealed significant individual differences, suggesting that use of multiple categories is one of a number of strategies that can be used rather than being the basis for most category-based induction.",
keywords = "categorization, category-based induction, concepts, reasoning, uncertainty",
author = "Murphy, {Gregory L.} and Ross, {Brian H.}",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1037/a0018685",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "263--276",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0278-7393",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uncertainty in Category-Based Induction

T2 - When Do People Integrate Across Categories?

AU - Murphy, Gregory L.

AU - Ross, Brian H.

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Two experiments investigated how people perform category-based induction for items that have uncertain categorization. Whereas normative considerations suggest that people should consider multiple relevant categories, much past research has argued that people focus on only the most likely category. A new method is introduced in which responses on individual trials can be classified as using single or multiple categories, an improvement on past methods that relied on null effects as evidence for single-category use. Experiment 1 found that people did use multiple categories when the most likely category gave an ambiguous induction but that few people did so when it gave an unambiguous induction. Experiment 2 suggested that the reluctance to use multiple categories arose from a cognitive shortcut, in which only one source of information is consulted. The experiments revealed significant individual differences, suggesting that use of multiple categories is one of a number of strategies that can be used rather than being the basis for most category-based induction.

AB - Two experiments investigated how people perform category-based induction for items that have uncertain categorization. Whereas normative considerations suggest that people should consider multiple relevant categories, much past research has argued that people focus on only the most likely category. A new method is introduced in which responses on individual trials can be classified as using single or multiple categories, an improvement on past methods that relied on null effects as evidence for single-category use. Experiment 1 found that people did use multiple categories when the most likely category gave an ambiguous induction but that few people did so when it gave an unambiguous induction. Experiment 2 suggested that the reluctance to use multiple categories arose from a cognitive shortcut, in which only one source of information is consulted. The experiments revealed significant individual differences, suggesting that use of multiple categories is one of a number of strategies that can be used rather than being the basis for most category-based induction.

KW - categorization

KW - category-based induction

KW - concepts

KW - reasoning

KW - uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649211487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649211487&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0018685

DO - 10.1037/a0018685

M3 - Article

C2 - 20192530

AN - SCOPUS:77649211487

VL - 36

SP - 263

EP - 276

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

SN - 0278-7393

IS - 2

ER -