(Un)Available upon Request: Field Experiment on Researchers' Willingness to Share Supplementary Materials

Michal Krawczyk, Ernesto Reuben

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article reports results of a field experiment in which two hundred e-mails were sent to authors of recent articles in economics that had promised to send the interested reader supplementary material, such as alternative econometric specifications, "upon request." The e-mails were sent either by a researcher affiliated at Columbia University, New York or the University of Warsaw, Poland; furthermore, the authors' position (assistant professor) was specified in half the e-mails only. Overall, 64% of the approached authors responded to our message, of which two thirds (44% of the entire sample) delivered the requested materials. The frequency and speed of responding and delivering were very weakly affected by the position and affiliation of the sender. Gender or affiliation of the author, number of citations or journal impact factor or the type of object in question seemed to make no difference. However, authors of published articles were much more likely to share than authors of working papers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)175-186
Number of pages12
JournalAccountability in Research
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2012

Fingerprint

e-mail
experiment
assistant
econometrics
Poland
university teacher
gender
economics

Keywords

  • data sharing
  • field experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

(Un)Available upon Request : Field Experiment on Researchers' Willingness to Share Supplementary Materials. / Krawczyk, Michal; Reuben, Ernesto.

In: Accountability in Research, Vol. 19, No. 3, 01.05.2012, p. 175-186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c71470da056a403da4d232c3caa9bfa2,
title = "(Un)Available upon Request: Field Experiment on Researchers' Willingness to Share Supplementary Materials",
abstract = "This article reports results of a field experiment in which two hundred e-mails were sent to authors of recent articles in economics that had promised to send the interested reader supplementary material, such as alternative econometric specifications, {"}upon request.{"} The e-mails were sent either by a researcher affiliated at Columbia University, New York or the University of Warsaw, Poland; furthermore, the authors' position (assistant professor) was specified in half the e-mails only. Overall, 64{\%} of the approached authors responded to our message, of which two thirds (44{\%} of the entire sample) delivered the requested materials. The frequency and speed of responding and delivering were very weakly affected by the position and affiliation of the sender. Gender or affiliation of the author, number of citations or journal impact factor or the type of object in question seemed to make no difference. However, authors of published articles were much more likely to share than authors of working papers.",
keywords = "data sharing, field experiment",
author = "Michal Krawczyk and Ernesto Reuben",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08989621.2012.678688",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "175--186",
journal = "Accountability in Research",
issn = "0898-9621",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - (Un)Available upon Request

T2 - Field Experiment on Researchers' Willingness to Share Supplementary Materials

AU - Krawczyk, Michal

AU - Reuben, Ernesto

PY - 2012/5/1

Y1 - 2012/5/1

N2 - This article reports results of a field experiment in which two hundred e-mails were sent to authors of recent articles in economics that had promised to send the interested reader supplementary material, such as alternative econometric specifications, "upon request." The e-mails were sent either by a researcher affiliated at Columbia University, New York or the University of Warsaw, Poland; furthermore, the authors' position (assistant professor) was specified in half the e-mails only. Overall, 64% of the approached authors responded to our message, of which two thirds (44% of the entire sample) delivered the requested materials. The frequency and speed of responding and delivering were very weakly affected by the position and affiliation of the sender. Gender or affiliation of the author, number of citations or journal impact factor or the type of object in question seemed to make no difference. However, authors of published articles were much more likely to share than authors of working papers.

AB - This article reports results of a field experiment in which two hundred e-mails were sent to authors of recent articles in economics that had promised to send the interested reader supplementary material, such as alternative econometric specifications, "upon request." The e-mails were sent either by a researcher affiliated at Columbia University, New York or the University of Warsaw, Poland; furthermore, the authors' position (assistant professor) was specified in half the e-mails only. Overall, 64% of the approached authors responded to our message, of which two thirds (44% of the entire sample) delivered the requested materials. The frequency and speed of responding and delivering were very weakly affected by the position and affiliation of the sender. Gender or affiliation of the author, number of citations or journal impact factor or the type of object in question seemed to make no difference. However, authors of published articles were much more likely to share than authors of working papers.

KW - data sharing

KW - field experiment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862498308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862498308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08989621.2012.678688

DO - 10.1080/08989621.2012.678688

M3 - Article

C2 - 22686633

AN - SCOPUS:84862498308

VL - 19

SP - 175

EP - 186

JO - Accountability in Research

JF - Accountability in Research

SN - 0898-9621

IS - 3

ER -