Two illustrations of the quantity theory of money

Breakdowns and revivals

Thomas Sargent, Paolo Surico

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    By extending his data, we document the instability of low-frequency regression coefficients that Lucas (1980) used to express the quantity theory of money. We impute the differences in these regression coefficients to differences in monetary policies across periods. A DSGE model estimated over a subsample like Lucas's implies values of the regression coefficients that confirm Lucas's results for his sample period. But perturbing monetary policy rule parameters away from the values estimated over Lucas's subsample alters the regression coefficients in ways that reproduce their instability over our longer sample.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)109-128
    Number of pages20
    JournalAmerican Economic Review
    Volume101
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Feb 2011

    Fingerprint

    Quantity theory of money
    Breakdown
    Coefficients
    DSGE models
    Monetary policy
    Monetary policy rules

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics

    Cite this

    Two illustrations of the quantity theory of money : Breakdowns and revivals. / Sargent, Thomas; Surico, Paolo.

    In: American Economic Review, Vol. 101, No. 1, 02.2011, p. 109-128.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Sargent, Thomas ; Surico, Paolo. / Two illustrations of the quantity theory of money : Breakdowns and revivals. In: American Economic Review. 2011 ; Vol. 101, No. 1. pp. 109-128.
    @article{26351dfa3b5640d3aac3479182b8acb1,
    title = "Two illustrations of the quantity theory of money: Breakdowns and revivals",
    abstract = "By extending his data, we document the instability of low-frequency regression coefficients that Lucas (1980) used to express the quantity theory of money. We impute the differences in these regression coefficients to differences in monetary policies across periods. A DSGE model estimated over a subsample like Lucas's implies values of the regression coefficients that confirm Lucas's results for his sample period. But perturbing monetary policy rule parameters away from the values estimated over Lucas's subsample alters the regression coefficients in ways that reproduce their instability over our longer sample.",
    author = "Thomas Sargent and Paolo Surico",
    year = "2011",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1257/aer.101.1.109",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "101",
    pages = "109--128",
    journal = "American Economic Review",
    issn = "0002-8282",
    publisher = "American Economic Association",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Two illustrations of the quantity theory of money

    T2 - Breakdowns and revivals

    AU - Sargent, Thomas

    AU - Surico, Paolo

    PY - 2011/2

    Y1 - 2011/2

    N2 - By extending his data, we document the instability of low-frequency regression coefficients that Lucas (1980) used to express the quantity theory of money. We impute the differences in these regression coefficients to differences in monetary policies across periods. A DSGE model estimated over a subsample like Lucas's implies values of the regression coefficients that confirm Lucas's results for his sample period. But perturbing monetary policy rule parameters away from the values estimated over Lucas's subsample alters the regression coefficients in ways that reproduce their instability over our longer sample.

    AB - By extending his data, we document the instability of low-frequency regression coefficients that Lucas (1980) used to express the quantity theory of money. We impute the differences in these regression coefficients to differences in monetary policies across periods. A DSGE model estimated over a subsample like Lucas's implies values of the regression coefficients that confirm Lucas's results for his sample period. But perturbing monetary policy rule parameters away from the values estimated over Lucas's subsample alters the regression coefficients in ways that reproduce their instability over our longer sample.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952155641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952155641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1257/aer.101.1.109

    DO - 10.1257/aer.101.1.109

    M3 - Article

    VL - 101

    SP - 109

    EP - 128

    JO - American Economic Review

    JF - American Economic Review

    SN - 0002-8282

    IS - 1

    ER -