Tweeting identity? Ukrainian, Russian, and #Euromaidan

Megan MacDuffee Metzger, Richard Bonneau, Jonathan Nagler, Joshua A. Tucker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Why and when do group identities become salient? Existing scholarship has suggested that insecurity and competition over political and economic resources as well as increased perceptions of threat from the out-group tend to increase the salience of ethnic identities. Most of the work on ethnicity, however, is either experimental and deals with how people respond once identity has already been primed, is based on self-reported measures of identity, or driven by election results. In contrast, here we examine events in Ukraine from late 2013 (the beginning of the Euromaidan protests) through the end of 2014 to see if particular moments of heightened political tension led to increased identification as either "Russian" or "Ukrainian" among Ukrainian citizens. In tackling this question, we use a novel methodological approach by testing the hypothesis that those who prefer to use Ukrainian to communicate on Twitter will use Ukrainian (at the expense of Russian) following moments of heightened political awareness and those who prefer to use Russian will do the opposite. Interestingly, our primary finding in is a negative result: we do not find evidence that key political events in the Ukrainian crisis led to a reversion to the language of choice at the aggregate level, which is interesting given how much ink has been spilt on the question of the extent to which Euromaidan reflected an underlying Ukrainian vs. Russian conflict. However, we unexpectedly find that both those who prefer Russian and those who prefer Ukrainian begin using Russian with a greater frequency following the annexation of Crimea, thus contributing a whole new set of puzzles - and a method for exploring these puzzles - that can serve as a basis for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16-40
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Comparative Economics
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016

Fingerprint

Spill
Ethnic identity
Outgroup
Language
Protest
Threat
Expenses
Elections
Twitter
Testing
Economic resources
Ukraine
Group identity
Ethnic groups

Keywords

  • #Euromaidan
  • 052
  • D7
  • Identity
  • Language
  • P16
  • Protest
  • Social media
  • Ukraine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Tweeting identity? Ukrainian, Russian, and #Euromaidan. / MacDuffee Metzger, Megan; Bonneau, Richard; Nagler, Jonathan; Tucker, Joshua A.

In: Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 44, No. 1, 01.02.2016, p. 16-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

MacDuffee Metzger, Megan ; Bonneau, Richard ; Nagler, Jonathan ; Tucker, Joshua A. / Tweeting identity? Ukrainian, Russian, and #Euromaidan. In: Journal of Comparative Economics. 2016 ; Vol. 44, No. 1. pp. 16-40.
@article{382707851507411fad43cbd339adf5ed,
title = "Tweeting identity? Ukrainian, Russian, and #Euromaidan",
abstract = "Why and when do group identities become salient? Existing scholarship has suggested that insecurity and competition over political and economic resources as well as increased perceptions of threat from the out-group tend to increase the salience of ethnic identities. Most of the work on ethnicity, however, is either experimental and deals with how people respond once identity has already been primed, is based on self-reported measures of identity, or driven by election results. In contrast, here we examine events in Ukraine from late 2013 (the beginning of the Euromaidan protests) through the end of 2014 to see if particular moments of heightened political tension led to increased identification as either {"}Russian{"} or {"}Ukrainian{"} among Ukrainian citizens. In tackling this question, we use a novel methodological approach by testing the hypothesis that those who prefer to use Ukrainian to communicate on Twitter will use Ukrainian (at the expense of Russian) following moments of heightened political awareness and those who prefer to use Russian will do the opposite. Interestingly, our primary finding in is a negative result: we do not find evidence that key political events in the Ukrainian crisis led to a reversion to the language of choice at the aggregate level, which is interesting given how much ink has been spilt on the question of the extent to which Euromaidan reflected an underlying Ukrainian vs. Russian conflict. However, we unexpectedly find that both those who prefer Russian and those who prefer Ukrainian begin using Russian with a greater frequency following the annexation of Crimea, thus contributing a whole new set of puzzles - and a method for exploring these puzzles - that can serve as a basis for future research.",
keywords = "#Euromaidan, 052, D7, Identity, Language, P16, Protest, Social media, Ukraine",
author = "{MacDuffee Metzger}, Megan and Richard Bonneau and Jonathan Nagler and Tucker, {Joshua A.}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jce.2015.12.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "16--40",
journal = "Journal of Comparative Economics",
issn = "0147-5967",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tweeting identity? Ukrainian, Russian, and #Euromaidan

AU - MacDuffee Metzger, Megan

AU - Bonneau, Richard

AU - Nagler, Jonathan

AU - Tucker, Joshua A.

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Why and when do group identities become salient? Existing scholarship has suggested that insecurity and competition over political and economic resources as well as increased perceptions of threat from the out-group tend to increase the salience of ethnic identities. Most of the work on ethnicity, however, is either experimental and deals with how people respond once identity has already been primed, is based on self-reported measures of identity, or driven by election results. In contrast, here we examine events in Ukraine from late 2013 (the beginning of the Euromaidan protests) through the end of 2014 to see if particular moments of heightened political tension led to increased identification as either "Russian" or "Ukrainian" among Ukrainian citizens. In tackling this question, we use a novel methodological approach by testing the hypothesis that those who prefer to use Ukrainian to communicate on Twitter will use Ukrainian (at the expense of Russian) following moments of heightened political awareness and those who prefer to use Russian will do the opposite. Interestingly, our primary finding in is a negative result: we do not find evidence that key political events in the Ukrainian crisis led to a reversion to the language of choice at the aggregate level, which is interesting given how much ink has been spilt on the question of the extent to which Euromaidan reflected an underlying Ukrainian vs. Russian conflict. However, we unexpectedly find that both those who prefer Russian and those who prefer Ukrainian begin using Russian with a greater frequency following the annexation of Crimea, thus contributing a whole new set of puzzles - and a method for exploring these puzzles - that can serve as a basis for future research.

AB - Why and when do group identities become salient? Existing scholarship has suggested that insecurity and competition over political and economic resources as well as increased perceptions of threat from the out-group tend to increase the salience of ethnic identities. Most of the work on ethnicity, however, is either experimental and deals with how people respond once identity has already been primed, is based on self-reported measures of identity, or driven by election results. In contrast, here we examine events in Ukraine from late 2013 (the beginning of the Euromaidan protests) through the end of 2014 to see if particular moments of heightened political tension led to increased identification as either "Russian" or "Ukrainian" among Ukrainian citizens. In tackling this question, we use a novel methodological approach by testing the hypothesis that those who prefer to use Ukrainian to communicate on Twitter will use Ukrainian (at the expense of Russian) following moments of heightened political awareness and those who prefer to use Russian will do the opposite. Interestingly, our primary finding in is a negative result: we do not find evidence that key political events in the Ukrainian crisis led to a reversion to the language of choice at the aggregate level, which is interesting given how much ink has been spilt on the question of the extent to which Euromaidan reflected an underlying Ukrainian vs. Russian conflict. However, we unexpectedly find that both those who prefer Russian and those who prefer Ukrainian begin using Russian with a greater frequency following the annexation of Crimea, thus contributing a whole new set of puzzles - and a method for exploring these puzzles - that can serve as a basis for future research.

KW - #Euromaidan

KW - 052

KW - D7

KW - Identity

KW - Language

KW - P16

KW - Protest

KW - Social media

KW - Ukraine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958119492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84958119492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jce.2015.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jce.2015.12.004

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 16

EP - 40

JO - Journal of Comparative Economics

JF - Journal of Comparative Economics

SN - 0147-5967

IS - 1

ER -