Tunnel face support pressure and associated risk

Mahmoud Ahmed, Magued Iskander

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Prediction of ground movements and risk assessment of damage to adjacent buildings and utilities have become an essential part of the success of tunneling projects in urban environments. First stage assessment of risk in tunneling zones involved evaluation of face stability conditions and ground movement induced by tunneling. This paper presents experimental work on the stability of a tunnel face using transparent soil models to estimate the magnitude of tunnel face minimum supporting pressure, failure pattern and extension of failed zone which can further be applied to tunnel risk analysis. The model tunnel was installed in a plexiglas box filled with transparent soil and was supported at the face by means of water pressure. Tests were performed by reducing supporting pressure until collapse occurred. Model tests were sliced optically with a laser sheet and images were captured for every decrement in tunnel supporting pressure. Later, these images were analyzed by Digital Image Correlation (DIC) and vector fields of incremental displacements were obtained. The value of minimum support pressure was obtained and geometry of the failure zones was found to be of chimney shape with a limited extension in front of the face. Contour plots of resultant ground movement at pre-collapse and post failure indicated that a minimum distance equal to the tunnel diameter should be considered above and a way form the tunnel for underground utilities risk assessment. A minimum support pressure was achieved with support pressures as low as 10% of the effective vertical stress at the tunnel axis. The stability of the tunnel face was related to the coefficient of active earth pressure. In general, results of the study were in agreement with current knowledge of full-scale situations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationGeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management - Proceedings of the GeoRisk 2011 Conference
Pages939-947
Number of pages9
Edition224 GSP
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
EventGeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management - Atlanta, GA, United States
Duration: Jun 26 2011Jun 28 2011

Other

OtherGeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management
CountryUnited States
CityAtlanta, GA
Period6/26/116/28/11

Fingerprint

Tunnels
tunnel
ground movement
Risk assessment
risk assessment
Soils
Chimneys
earth pressure
Risk analysis
digital image
model test
soil
laser
Earth (planet)
geometry
damage
Geometry
Lasers
prediction
Water

Keywords

  • Geohazards
  • Predictions
  • Risk management
  • Tunnels
  • Underground construction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Cite this

Ahmed, M., & Iskander, M. (2011). Tunnel face support pressure and associated risk. In GeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management - Proceedings of the GeoRisk 2011 Conference (224 GSP ed., pp. 939-947) https://doi.org/10.1061/41183(418)101

Tunnel face support pressure and associated risk. / Ahmed, Mahmoud; Iskander, Magued.

GeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management - Proceedings of the GeoRisk 2011 Conference. 224 GSP. ed. 2011. p. 939-947.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Ahmed, M & Iskander, M 2011, Tunnel face support pressure and associated risk. in GeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management - Proceedings of the GeoRisk 2011 Conference. 224 GSP edn, pp. 939-947, GeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management, Atlanta, GA, United States, 6/26/11. https://doi.org/10.1061/41183(418)101
Ahmed M, Iskander M. Tunnel face support pressure and associated risk. In GeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management - Proceedings of the GeoRisk 2011 Conference. 224 GSP ed. 2011. p. 939-947 https://doi.org/10.1061/41183(418)101
Ahmed, Mahmoud ; Iskander, Magued. / Tunnel face support pressure and associated risk. GeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management - Proceedings of the GeoRisk 2011 Conference. 224 GSP. ed. 2011. pp. 939-947
@inproceedings{74f52384634e487194e4e66fe3048b7b,
title = "Tunnel face support pressure and associated risk",
abstract = "Prediction of ground movements and risk assessment of damage to adjacent buildings and utilities have become an essential part of the success of tunneling projects in urban environments. First stage assessment of risk in tunneling zones involved evaluation of face stability conditions and ground movement induced by tunneling. This paper presents experimental work on the stability of a tunnel face using transparent soil models to estimate the magnitude of tunnel face minimum supporting pressure, failure pattern and extension of failed zone which can further be applied to tunnel risk analysis. The model tunnel was installed in a plexiglas box filled with transparent soil and was supported at the face by means of water pressure. Tests were performed by reducing supporting pressure until collapse occurred. Model tests were sliced optically with a laser sheet and images were captured for every decrement in tunnel supporting pressure. Later, these images were analyzed by Digital Image Correlation (DIC) and vector fields of incremental displacements were obtained. The value of minimum support pressure was obtained and geometry of the failure zones was found to be of chimney shape with a limited extension in front of the face. Contour plots of resultant ground movement at pre-collapse and post failure indicated that a minimum distance equal to the tunnel diameter should be considered above and a way form the tunnel for underground utilities risk assessment. A minimum support pressure was achieved with support pressures as low as 10{\%} of the effective vertical stress at the tunnel axis. The stability of the tunnel face was related to the coefficient of active earth pressure. In general, results of the study were in agreement with current knowledge of full-scale situations.",
keywords = "Geohazards, Predictions, Risk management, Tunnels, Underground construction",
author = "Mahmoud Ahmed and Magued Iskander",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1061/41183(418)101",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780784411834",
pages = "939--947",
booktitle = "GeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management - Proceedings of the GeoRisk 2011 Conference",
edition = "224 GSP",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Tunnel face support pressure and associated risk

AU - Ahmed, Mahmoud

AU - Iskander, Magued

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Prediction of ground movements and risk assessment of damage to adjacent buildings and utilities have become an essential part of the success of tunneling projects in urban environments. First stage assessment of risk in tunneling zones involved evaluation of face stability conditions and ground movement induced by tunneling. This paper presents experimental work on the stability of a tunnel face using transparent soil models to estimate the magnitude of tunnel face minimum supporting pressure, failure pattern and extension of failed zone which can further be applied to tunnel risk analysis. The model tunnel was installed in a plexiglas box filled with transparent soil and was supported at the face by means of water pressure. Tests were performed by reducing supporting pressure until collapse occurred. Model tests were sliced optically with a laser sheet and images were captured for every decrement in tunnel supporting pressure. Later, these images were analyzed by Digital Image Correlation (DIC) and vector fields of incremental displacements were obtained. The value of minimum support pressure was obtained and geometry of the failure zones was found to be of chimney shape with a limited extension in front of the face. Contour plots of resultant ground movement at pre-collapse and post failure indicated that a minimum distance equal to the tunnel diameter should be considered above and a way form the tunnel for underground utilities risk assessment. A minimum support pressure was achieved with support pressures as low as 10% of the effective vertical stress at the tunnel axis. The stability of the tunnel face was related to the coefficient of active earth pressure. In general, results of the study were in agreement with current knowledge of full-scale situations.

AB - Prediction of ground movements and risk assessment of damage to adjacent buildings and utilities have become an essential part of the success of tunneling projects in urban environments. First stage assessment of risk in tunneling zones involved evaluation of face stability conditions and ground movement induced by tunneling. This paper presents experimental work on the stability of a tunnel face using transparent soil models to estimate the magnitude of tunnel face minimum supporting pressure, failure pattern and extension of failed zone which can further be applied to tunnel risk analysis. The model tunnel was installed in a plexiglas box filled with transparent soil and was supported at the face by means of water pressure. Tests were performed by reducing supporting pressure until collapse occurred. Model tests were sliced optically with a laser sheet and images were captured for every decrement in tunnel supporting pressure. Later, these images were analyzed by Digital Image Correlation (DIC) and vector fields of incremental displacements were obtained. The value of minimum support pressure was obtained and geometry of the failure zones was found to be of chimney shape with a limited extension in front of the face. Contour plots of resultant ground movement at pre-collapse and post failure indicated that a minimum distance equal to the tunnel diameter should be considered above and a way form the tunnel for underground utilities risk assessment. A minimum support pressure was achieved with support pressures as low as 10% of the effective vertical stress at the tunnel axis. The stability of the tunnel face was related to the coefficient of active earth pressure. In general, results of the study were in agreement with current knowledge of full-scale situations.

KW - Geohazards

KW - Predictions

KW - Risk management

KW - Tunnels

KW - Underground construction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80051883271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80051883271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/41183(418)101

DO - 10.1061/41183(418)101

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780784411834

SP - 939

EP - 947

BT - GeoRisk 2011: Geotechnical Risk Assessment and Management - Proceedings of the GeoRisk 2011 Conference

ER -