Triangulation as splitting in the service of ambivalence

Samuel Juni

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Ambivalence mastery is postulated as a primary dynamic in triangulation, by appealing to splitting and other defense mechanism strategies in synthesizing incompatible affect. The rationale of admissible triangles in balance theory is critically evaluated, and is elaborated in terms of directional vectors and the interpretation of the triangle as a transformed variant of the double bind. Using an illustrative case presentation where an adolescent was instrumental in forming a coalition with his father against an uncle, a theoretical model is developed reconceptualizing various family systems tenets and addressing inconsistencies in hypothesized mechanisms. Ambivalence is analyzed in terms of transference and as a prerequisite of triangulation, the role of the triangulated in relational stability is examined, and the dyad/triad evolution is elaborated. The model is then related to the basic theoretical positions in family systems literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-111
Number of pages21
JournalCurrent Psychology
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1995

Fingerprint

Defense Mechanisms
Fathers
Theoretical Models
Transference (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Triangulation as splitting in the service of ambivalence. / Juni, Samuel.

In: Current Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 2, 06.1995, p. 91-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Juni, Samuel. / Triangulation as splitting in the service of ambivalence. In: Current Psychology. 1995 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 91-111.
@article{493318f9b60f4e0684220e1590389f7e,
title = "Triangulation as splitting in the service of ambivalence",
abstract = "Ambivalence mastery is postulated as a primary dynamic in triangulation, by appealing to splitting and other defense mechanism strategies in synthesizing incompatible affect. The rationale of admissible triangles in balance theory is critically evaluated, and is elaborated in terms of directional vectors and the interpretation of the triangle as a transformed variant of the double bind. Using an illustrative case presentation where an adolescent was instrumental in forming a coalition with his father against an uncle, a theoretical model is developed reconceptualizing various family systems tenets and addressing inconsistencies in hypothesized mechanisms. Ambivalence is analyzed in terms of transference and as a prerequisite of triangulation, the role of the triangulated in relational stability is examined, and the dyad/triad evolution is elaborated. The model is then related to the basic theoretical positions in family systems literature.",
author = "Samuel Juni",
year = "1995",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/BF02686884",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "91--111",
journal = "Current Psychology",
issn = "0737-8262",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Triangulation as splitting in the service of ambivalence

AU - Juni, Samuel

PY - 1995/6

Y1 - 1995/6

N2 - Ambivalence mastery is postulated as a primary dynamic in triangulation, by appealing to splitting and other defense mechanism strategies in synthesizing incompatible affect. The rationale of admissible triangles in balance theory is critically evaluated, and is elaborated in terms of directional vectors and the interpretation of the triangle as a transformed variant of the double bind. Using an illustrative case presentation where an adolescent was instrumental in forming a coalition with his father against an uncle, a theoretical model is developed reconceptualizing various family systems tenets and addressing inconsistencies in hypothesized mechanisms. Ambivalence is analyzed in terms of transference and as a prerequisite of triangulation, the role of the triangulated in relational stability is examined, and the dyad/triad evolution is elaborated. The model is then related to the basic theoretical positions in family systems literature.

AB - Ambivalence mastery is postulated as a primary dynamic in triangulation, by appealing to splitting and other defense mechanism strategies in synthesizing incompatible affect. The rationale of admissible triangles in balance theory is critically evaluated, and is elaborated in terms of directional vectors and the interpretation of the triangle as a transformed variant of the double bind. Using an illustrative case presentation where an adolescent was instrumental in forming a coalition with his father against an uncle, a theoretical model is developed reconceptualizing various family systems tenets and addressing inconsistencies in hypothesized mechanisms. Ambivalence is analyzed in terms of transference and as a prerequisite of triangulation, the role of the triangulated in relational stability is examined, and the dyad/triad evolution is elaborated. The model is then related to the basic theoretical positions in family systems literature.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51249167472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=51249167472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02686884

DO - 10.1007/BF02686884

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:51249167472

VL - 14

SP - 91

EP - 111

JO - Current Psychology

JF - Current Psychology

SN - 0737-8262

IS - 2

ER -