Treatment planning in dentistry using an electronic health record: Implications for undergraduate education

O. Tokede, M. Walji, R. Ramoni, J. M. White, M. Schoonheim-Klein, N. S. Kimmes, R. Vaderhobli, P. C. Stark, V. L. Patel, E. Kalenderian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Treatment planning, an essential component of clinical practice, has received little attention in the dental literature and there appears to be no consistent format being followed in the teaching and development of treatment plans within dental school curricula. No investigation, to our knowledge, has been carried out to explore the subject of treatment planning since the advent of electronic health record (EHR) use in dentistry. It is therefore important to examine the topic of treatment planning in the context of EHRs. Methods: This paper reports on how 25 predoctoral dental students from two U.S. schools performed when asked to complete diagnosis and treatment planning exercises for two clinical scenarios in an EHR. Three calibrated clinical teaching faculty scored diagnosis entry, diagnosis-treatment (procedure) pairing, and sequencing of treatment according to criteria taught in their curriculum. Scores were then converted to percent correct and reported as means (with standard deviations). Results: Overall, the participants earned 48.2% of the possible points. Participants at School 2 earned a mean of 54.3% compared with participants at School 1, who earned 41.9%. Students fared better selecting the appropriate treatment (59.8%) compared with choosing the correct diagnoses (41.9%) but performed least favorably when organizing the sequence of their treatment plans (41.7%). Conclusion: Our results highlight the need to improve the current process by which treatment planning is taught and also to consider the impact of technology on the fundamental skills of diagnosis and treatment planning within the modern educational setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEuropean Journal of Dental Education
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

dentistry
Electronic Health Records
Dentistry
electronics
Education
planning
health
education
school
Therapeutics
curriculum
educational setting
Teaching
Curriculum
student
Dental Students
scenario
Dental Schools
Tooth
Exercise

Keywords

  • Clinical protocol
  • Dentistry
  • Diagnosis
  • Education
  • Electronic health record

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Treatment planning in dentistry using an electronic health record : Implications for undergraduate education. / Tokede, O.; Walji, M.; Ramoni, R.; White, J. M.; Schoonheim-Klein, M.; Kimmes, N. S.; Vaderhobli, R.; Stark, P. C.; Patel, V. L.; Kalenderian, E.

In: European Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 17, No. 1, 02.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tokede, O, Walji, M, Ramoni, R, White, JM, Schoonheim-Klein, M, Kimmes, NS, Vaderhobli, R, Stark, PC, Patel, VL & Kalenderian, E 2013, 'Treatment planning in dentistry using an electronic health record: Implications for undergraduate education', European Journal of Dental Education, vol. 17, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0579.2012.00759.x
Tokede, O. ; Walji, M. ; Ramoni, R. ; White, J. M. ; Schoonheim-Klein, M. ; Kimmes, N. S. ; Vaderhobli, R. ; Stark, P. C. ; Patel, V. L. ; Kalenderian, E. / Treatment planning in dentistry using an electronic health record : Implications for undergraduate education. In: European Journal of Dental Education. 2013 ; Vol. 17, No. 1.
@article{9175f0582698431b9f4b29a576b7d9ac,
title = "Treatment planning in dentistry using an electronic health record: Implications for undergraduate education",
abstract = "Objective: Treatment planning, an essential component of clinical practice, has received little attention in the dental literature and there appears to be no consistent format being followed in the teaching and development of treatment plans within dental school curricula. No investigation, to our knowledge, has been carried out to explore the subject of treatment planning since the advent of electronic health record (EHR) use in dentistry. It is therefore important to examine the topic of treatment planning in the context of EHRs. Methods: This paper reports on how 25 predoctoral dental students from two U.S. schools performed when asked to complete diagnosis and treatment planning exercises for two clinical scenarios in an EHR. Three calibrated clinical teaching faculty scored diagnosis entry, diagnosis-treatment (procedure) pairing, and sequencing of treatment according to criteria taught in their curriculum. Scores were then converted to percent correct and reported as means (with standard deviations). Results: Overall, the participants earned 48.2{\%} of the possible points. Participants at School 2 earned a mean of 54.3{\%} compared with participants at School 1, who earned 41.9{\%}. Students fared better selecting the appropriate treatment (59.8{\%}) compared with choosing the correct diagnoses (41.9{\%}) but performed least favorably when organizing the sequence of their treatment plans (41.7{\%}). Conclusion: Our results highlight the need to improve the current process by which treatment planning is taught and also to consider the impact of technology on the fundamental skills of diagnosis and treatment planning within the modern educational setting.",
keywords = "Clinical protocol, Dentistry, Diagnosis, Education, Electronic health record",
author = "O. Tokede and M. Walji and R. Ramoni and White, {J. M.} and M. Schoonheim-Klein and Kimmes, {N. S.} and R. Vaderhobli and Stark, {P. C.} and Patel, {V. L.} and E. Kalenderian",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0579.2012.00759.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
journal = "European Journal of Dental Education",
issn = "1396-5883",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment planning in dentistry using an electronic health record

T2 - Implications for undergraduate education

AU - Tokede, O.

AU - Walji, M.

AU - Ramoni, R.

AU - White, J. M.

AU - Schoonheim-Klein, M.

AU - Kimmes, N. S.

AU - Vaderhobli, R.

AU - Stark, P. C.

AU - Patel, V. L.

AU - Kalenderian, E.

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Objective: Treatment planning, an essential component of clinical practice, has received little attention in the dental literature and there appears to be no consistent format being followed in the teaching and development of treatment plans within dental school curricula. No investigation, to our knowledge, has been carried out to explore the subject of treatment planning since the advent of electronic health record (EHR) use in dentistry. It is therefore important to examine the topic of treatment planning in the context of EHRs. Methods: This paper reports on how 25 predoctoral dental students from two U.S. schools performed when asked to complete diagnosis and treatment planning exercises for two clinical scenarios in an EHR. Three calibrated clinical teaching faculty scored diagnosis entry, diagnosis-treatment (procedure) pairing, and sequencing of treatment according to criteria taught in their curriculum. Scores were then converted to percent correct and reported as means (with standard deviations). Results: Overall, the participants earned 48.2% of the possible points. Participants at School 2 earned a mean of 54.3% compared with participants at School 1, who earned 41.9%. Students fared better selecting the appropriate treatment (59.8%) compared with choosing the correct diagnoses (41.9%) but performed least favorably when organizing the sequence of their treatment plans (41.7%). Conclusion: Our results highlight the need to improve the current process by which treatment planning is taught and also to consider the impact of technology on the fundamental skills of diagnosis and treatment planning within the modern educational setting.

AB - Objective: Treatment planning, an essential component of clinical practice, has received little attention in the dental literature and there appears to be no consistent format being followed in the teaching and development of treatment plans within dental school curricula. No investigation, to our knowledge, has been carried out to explore the subject of treatment planning since the advent of electronic health record (EHR) use in dentistry. It is therefore important to examine the topic of treatment planning in the context of EHRs. Methods: This paper reports on how 25 predoctoral dental students from two U.S. schools performed when asked to complete diagnosis and treatment planning exercises for two clinical scenarios in an EHR. Three calibrated clinical teaching faculty scored diagnosis entry, diagnosis-treatment (procedure) pairing, and sequencing of treatment according to criteria taught in their curriculum. Scores were then converted to percent correct and reported as means (with standard deviations). Results: Overall, the participants earned 48.2% of the possible points. Participants at School 2 earned a mean of 54.3% compared with participants at School 1, who earned 41.9%. Students fared better selecting the appropriate treatment (59.8%) compared with choosing the correct diagnoses (41.9%) but performed least favorably when organizing the sequence of their treatment plans (41.7%). Conclusion: Our results highlight the need to improve the current process by which treatment planning is taught and also to consider the impact of technology on the fundamental skills of diagnosis and treatment planning within the modern educational setting.

KW - Clinical protocol

KW - Dentistry

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Education

KW - Electronic health record

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871698034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871698034&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2012.00759.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2012.00759.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 23279411

AN - SCOPUS:84871698034

VL - 17

JO - European Journal of Dental Education

JF - European Journal of Dental Education

SN - 1396-5883

IS - 1

ER -