Traits and Social Stereotypes

Levels of Categorization in Person Perception

Susan Andersen, Roberta L. Klatzky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A theoretical distinction is made between trait categorization in person perception and categorization by means of well-articulated, concrete social stereotypes. Three studies test the prediction that social stereotypes are both more associatively rich and more distinctive than are trait-defined categories. In Study 1, subjects sorted adjectives related to extraversion and introversion. A cluster analysis using similarity measures derived from the sorting indicated that distinct social stereotypes were associated with each trait. This supports and extends earlier findings (Cantor & Mischel, 1979). In Study 2, subjects generated attributes of the trait categories and stereotypes that emerged in Study 1. More nonredundant attributes, especially visible features, were listed for the stereotypes than for the trait categories. Study 3 elicited the explicit associative structure of traits and related stereotypes by having subjects rate the association between a series of attributes (derived from the responses in Study 2) and each category label. Results showed that social stereotypes have distinctive features that are not shared with the related trait category, whereas trait categories share virtually all of their features with related stereotypes. The implications of the trait/stereotype distinction for social information processing are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)235-246
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume53
Issue number2
StatePublished - Aug 1987

Fingerprint

Automatic Data Processing
Cluster Analysis
stereotype
human being
introversion
minaprine
Sociological Factors
Extraversion (Psychology)
Introversion (Psychology)
cluster analysis
information processing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Traits and Social Stereotypes : Levels of Categorization in Person Perception. / Andersen, Susan; Klatzky, Roberta L.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 53, No. 2, 08.1987, p. 235-246.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Andersen, Susan ; Klatzky, Roberta L. / Traits and Social Stereotypes : Levels of Categorization in Person Perception. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1987 ; Vol. 53, No. 2. pp. 235-246.
@article{3c378b1123484cb68b3f8a375776ee71,
title = "Traits and Social Stereotypes: Levels of Categorization in Person Perception",
abstract = "A theoretical distinction is made between trait categorization in person perception and categorization by means of well-articulated, concrete social stereotypes. Three studies test the prediction that social stereotypes are both more associatively rich and more distinctive than are trait-defined categories. In Study 1, subjects sorted adjectives related to extraversion and introversion. A cluster analysis using similarity measures derived from the sorting indicated that distinct social stereotypes were associated with each trait. This supports and extends earlier findings (Cantor & Mischel, 1979). In Study 2, subjects generated attributes of the trait categories and stereotypes that emerged in Study 1. More nonredundant attributes, especially visible features, were listed for the stereotypes than for the trait categories. Study 3 elicited the explicit associative structure of traits and related stereotypes by having subjects rate the association between a series of attributes (derived from the responses in Study 2) and each category label. Results showed that social stereotypes have distinctive features that are not shared with the related trait category, whereas trait categories share virtually all of their features with related stereotypes. The implications of the trait/stereotype distinction for social information processing are discussed.",
author = "Susan Andersen and Klatzky, {Roberta L.}",
year = "1987",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "235--246",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Traits and Social Stereotypes

T2 - Levels of Categorization in Person Perception

AU - Andersen, Susan

AU - Klatzky, Roberta L.

PY - 1987/8

Y1 - 1987/8

N2 - A theoretical distinction is made between trait categorization in person perception and categorization by means of well-articulated, concrete social stereotypes. Three studies test the prediction that social stereotypes are both more associatively rich and more distinctive than are trait-defined categories. In Study 1, subjects sorted adjectives related to extraversion and introversion. A cluster analysis using similarity measures derived from the sorting indicated that distinct social stereotypes were associated with each trait. This supports and extends earlier findings (Cantor & Mischel, 1979). In Study 2, subjects generated attributes of the trait categories and stereotypes that emerged in Study 1. More nonredundant attributes, especially visible features, were listed for the stereotypes than for the trait categories. Study 3 elicited the explicit associative structure of traits and related stereotypes by having subjects rate the association between a series of attributes (derived from the responses in Study 2) and each category label. Results showed that social stereotypes have distinctive features that are not shared with the related trait category, whereas trait categories share virtually all of their features with related stereotypes. The implications of the trait/stereotype distinction for social information processing are discussed.

AB - A theoretical distinction is made between trait categorization in person perception and categorization by means of well-articulated, concrete social stereotypes. Three studies test the prediction that social stereotypes are both more associatively rich and more distinctive than are trait-defined categories. In Study 1, subjects sorted adjectives related to extraversion and introversion. A cluster analysis using similarity measures derived from the sorting indicated that distinct social stereotypes were associated with each trait. This supports and extends earlier findings (Cantor & Mischel, 1979). In Study 2, subjects generated attributes of the trait categories and stereotypes that emerged in Study 1. More nonredundant attributes, especially visible features, were listed for the stereotypes than for the trait categories. Study 3 elicited the explicit associative structure of traits and related stereotypes by having subjects rate the association between a series of attributes (derived from the responses in Study 2) and each category label. Results showed that social stereotypes have distinctive features that are not shared with the related trait category, whereas trait categories share virtually all of their features with related stereotypes. The implications of the trait/stereotype distinction for social information processing are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000037813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000037813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 235

EP - 246

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 2

ER -