Traits and Social Stereotypes: Efficiency Differences in Social Information Processing

Susan M. Andersen, Roberta L. Klatzky, John Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Research on the associative structure of social stereotypes and trait-defined categories has shown that stereotypes are associatively richer, more visual, and more distinctive (Andersen & Klatzky, 1987). We hypothesized that stereotypes might also operate more efficiently than trait-defined categories in social information processing. Participants were presented with sentences pairing either a stereotype or a trait label with an overt act or an internal state. Participants judged whether or not the designated target person would be likely to do or to experience what was described in the sentence. As predicted, participants judged the stereotype sentences significantly more quickly than the trait sentences. An incidental recall test of memory for the target terms, cued by the acts and states, showed that participants were also better able to remember the stereotypes than the traits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)192-201
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume59
Issue number2
StatePublished - Aug 1990

Fingerprint

Automatic Data Processing
information processing
stereotype
Efficiency
efficiency
Research
Sociological Factors
human being
experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Traits and Social Stereotypes : Efficiency Differences in Social Information Processing. / Andersen, Susan M.; Klatzky, Roberta L.; Murray, John.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 59, No. 2, 08.1990, p. 192-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Andersen, Susan M. ; Klatzky, Roberta L. ; Murray, John. / Traits and Social Stereotypes : Efficiency Differences in Social Information Processing. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990 ; Vol. 59, No. 2. pp. 192-201.
@article{e246f50ae7544f188c514dfe0ab8e7e7,
title = "Traits and Social Stereotypes: Efficiency Differences in Social Information Processing",
abstract = "Research on the associative structure of social stereotypes and trait-defined categories has shown that stereotypes are associatively richer, more visual, and more distinctive (Andersen & Klatzky, 1987). We hypothesized that stereotypes might also operate more efficiently than trait-defined categories in social information processing. Participants were presented with sentences pairing either a stereotype or a trait label with an overt act or an internal state. Participants judged whether or not the designated target person would be likely to do or to experience what was described in the sentence. As predicted, participants judged the stereotype sentences significantly more quickly than the trait sentences. An incidental recall test of memory for the target terms, cued by the acts and states, showed that participants were also better able to remember the stereotypes than the traits.",
author = "Andersen, {Susan M.} and Klatzky, {Roberta L.} and John Murray",
year = "1990",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "192--201",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Traits and Social Stereotypes

T2 - Efficiency Differences in Social Information Processing

AU - Andersen, Susan M.

AU - Klatzky, Roberta L.

AU - Murray, John

PY - 1990/8

Y1 - 1990/8

N2 - Research on the associative structure of social stereotypes and trait-defined categories has shown that stereotypes are associatively richer, more visual, and more distinctive (Andersen & Klatzky, 1987). We hypothesized that stereotypes might also operate more efficiently than trait-defined categories in social information processing. Participants were presented with sentences pairing either a stereotype or a trait label with an overt act or an internal state. Participants judged whether or not the designated target person would be likely to do or to experience what was described in the sentence. As predicted, participants judged the stereotype sentences significantly more quickly than the trait sentences. An incidental recall test of memory for the target terms, cued by the acts and states, showed that participants were also better able to remember the stereotypes than the traits.

AB - Research on the associative structure of social stereotypes and trait-defined categories has shown that stereotypes are associatively richer, more visual, and more distinctive (Andersen & Klatzky, 1987). We hypothesized that stereotypes might also operate more efficiently than trait-defined categories in social information processing. Participants were presented with sentences pairing either a stereotype or a trait label with an overt act or an internal state. Participants judged whether or not the designated target person would be likely to do or to experience what was described in the sentence. As predicted, participants judged the stereotype sentences significantly more quickly than the trait sentences. An incidental recall test of memory for the target terms, cued by the acts and states, showed that participants were also better able to remember the stereotypes than the traits.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149204793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149204793&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:58149204793

VL - 59

SP - 192

EP - 201

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 2

ER -