Tracking and incentivizing substance abusers in longitudinal research results of a survey of national institute on drug abuse-Funded Investigators

Farabee David, Angela Hawken, Peter Griffith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: Increased recognition that addictive behaviors tend to be chronic and relapsing has led to a growing emphasis on longitudinal substance abuse research. The purpose of this study was to identify effective follow-up strategies used by National Institute on Drug Abuse-funded investigators who have conducted at least 1 study involving follow-up data collection from human subjects. Methods: A web-based survey was administered to a representative ample of National Institute on Drug Abuse-funded researchers (N= 153) with a history of conducting longitudinal research. Results: Reported study response rates were generally high, although 27% of the studies fell below the 80% benchmark. Face-toface and telephone-based interviews commanded the largest subject payments-2 to 3 times higher than compensation rates for collection of biologic samples. With regard to the presumed impact of low follow-up rates on the generalizability of study findings, one-third of investigators who compared baseline characteristics of those who did and did not participate in the follow-up found meaningful differences. Support was found for the hypothesis that follow-up rates and total compensation would be positively related, with the mean compensation amounts between studies achieving < 80% follow-up rate versus those achieving rates ≥80%, revealing a statistically significant effect in the predicted direction. Conclusions: The majority of respondents reported difficulty in tracking and locating subjects, and study respondents often proved to be quite different from nonrespondents. Incentives improved follow-up rates to a point, although the relationship was not linear. Efforts to improve follow-up rates may be better spent on addressing tracking and locating logistics rather than on strategies to compel participation once the subject has been located.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-91
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Addiction Medicine
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

National Institute on Drug Abuse (U.S.)
Research Personnel
Research
Addictive Behavior
Benchmarking
Substance-Related Disorders
Motivation
Interviews
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Follow-up
  • Longitudinal
  • Tracking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

@article{b923a3a6946d4398b5d11741d2bf0e2c,
title = "Tracking and incentivizing substance abusers in longitudinal research results of a survey of national institute on drug abuse-Funded Investigators",
abstract = "Objectives: Increased recognition that addictive behaviors tend to be chronic and relapsing has led to a growing emphasis on longitudinal substance abuse research. The purpose of this study was to identify effective follow-up strategies used by National Institute on Drug Abuse-funded investigators who have conducted at least 1 study involving follow-up data collection from human subjects. Methods: A web-based survey was administered to a representative ample of National Institute on Drug Abuse-funded researchers (N= 153) with a history of conducting longitudinal research. Results: Reported study response rates were generally high, although 27{\%} of the studies fell below the 80{\%} benchmark. Face-toface and telephone-based interviews commanded the largest subject payments-2 to 3 times higher than compensation rates for collection of biologic samples. With regard to the presumed impact of low follow-up rates on the generalizability of study findings, one-third of investigators who compared baseline characteristics of those who did and did not participate in the follow-up found meaningful differences. Support was found for the hypothesis that follow-up rates and total compensation would be positively related, with the mean compensation amounts between studies achieving < 80{\%} follow-up rate versus those achieving rates ≥80{\%}, revealing a statistically significant effect in the predicted direction. Conclusions: The majority of respondents reported difficulty in tracking and locating subjects, and study respondents often proved to be quite different from nonrespondents. Incentives improved follow-up rates to a point, although the relationship was not linear. Efforts to improve follow-up rates may be better spent on addressing tracking and locating logistics rather than on strategies to compel participation once the subject has been located.",
keywords = "Follow-up, Longitudinal, Tracking",
author = "Farabee David and Angela Hawken and Peter Griffith",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181e11740",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "87--91",
journal = "Journal of Addiction Medicine",
issn = "1932-0620",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tracking and incentivizing substance abusers in longitudinal research results of a survey of national institute on drug abuse-Funded Investigators

AU - David, Farabee

AU - Hawken, Angela

AU - Griffith, Peter

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Objectives: Increased recognition that addictive behaviors tend to be chronic and relapsing has led to a growing emphasis on longitudinal substance abuse research. The purpose of this study was to identify effective follow-up strategies used by National Institute on Drug Abuse-funded investigators who have conducted at least 1 study involving follow-up data collection from human subjects. Methods: A web-based survey was administered to a representative ample of National Institute on Drug Abuse-funded researchers (N= 153) with a history of conducting longitudinal research. Results: Reported study response rates were generally high, although 27% of the studies fell below the 80% benchmark. Face-toface and telephone-based interviews commanded the largest subject payments-2 to 3 times higher than compensation rates for collection of biologic samples. With regard to the presumed impact of low follow-up rates on the generalizability of study findings, one-third of investigators who compared baseline characteristics of those who did and did not participate in the follow-up found meaningful differences. Support was found for the hypothesis that follow-up rates and total compensation would be positively related, with the mean compensation amounts between studies achieving < 80% follow-up rate versus those achieving rates ≥80%, revealing a statistically significant effect in the predicted direction. Conclusions: The majority of respondents reported difficulty in tracking and locating subjects, and study respondents often proved to be quite different from nonrespondents. Incentives improved follow-up rates to a point, although the relationship was not linear. Efforts to improve follow-up rates may be better spent on addressing tracking and locating logistics rather than on strategies to compel participation once the subject has been located.

AB - Objectives: Increased recognition that addictive behaviors tend to be chronic and relapsing has led to a growing emphasis on longitudinal substance abuse research. The purpose of this study was to identify effective follow-up strategies used by National Institute on Drug Abuse-funded investigators who have conducted at least 1 study involving follow-up data collection from human subjects. Methods: A web-based survey was administered to a representative ample of National Institute on Drug Abuse-funded researchers (N= 153) with a history of conducting longitudinal research. Results: Reported study response rates were generally high, although 27% of the studies fell below the 80% benchmark. Face-toface and telephone-based interviews commanded the largest subject payments-2 to 3 times higher than compensation rates for collection of biologic samples. With regard to the presumed impact of low follow-up rates on the generalizability of study findings, one-third of investigators who compared baseline characteristics of those who did and did not participate in the follow-up found meaningful differences. Support was found for the hypothesis that follow-up rates and total compensation would be positively related, with the mean compensation amounts between studies achieving < 80% follow-up rate versus those achieving rates ≥80%, revealing a statistically significant effect in the predicted direction. Conclusions: The majority of respondents reported difficulty in tracking and locating subjects, and study respondents often proved to be quite different from nonrespondents. Incentives improved follow-up rates to a point, although the relationship was not linear. Efforts to improve follow-up rates may be better spent on addressing tracking and locating logistics rather than on strategies to compel participation once the subject has been located.

KW - Follow-up

KW - Longitudinal

KW - Tracking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052158505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052158505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181e11740

DO - 10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181e11740

M3 - Article

C2 - 21769053

AN - SCOPUS:80052158505

VL - 5

SP - 87

EP - 91

JO - Journal of Addiction Medicine

JF - Journal of Addiction Medicine

SN - 1932-0620

IS - 2

ER -