Toward the sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa

A systematic review and conceptual framework

Juliet Iwelunmor, Sarah Blackstone, Dorice Veira, Ucheoma Nwaozuru, Collins Airhihenbuwa, Davison Munodawafa, Ezekiel Kalipeni, Antar Jutal, Donna Shelley, Gbenga Ogedegbe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is facing a double burden of disease with a rising prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) while the burden of communicable diseases (CDs) remains high. Despite these challenges, there remains a significant need to understand how or under what conditions health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa are sustained. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of empirical literature to explore how health interventions implemented in SSA are sustained. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Biological Abstracts, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, SCIELO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for available research investigating the sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa. We also used narrative synthesis to examine factors whether positive or negative that may influence the sustainability of health interventions in the region. Results: The search identified 1819 citations, and following removal of duplicates and our inclusion/exclusion criteria, only 41 papers were eligible for inclusion in the review. Twenty-six countries were represented in this review, with Kenya and Nigeria having the most representation of available studies examining sustainability. Study dates ranged from 1996 to 2015. Of note, majority of these studies (30 %) were published in 2014. The most common framework utilized was the sustainability framework, which was discussed in four of the studies. Nineteen out of 41 studies (46 %) reported sustainability outcomes focused on communicable diseases, with HIV and AIDS represented in majority of the studies, followed by malaria. Only 21 out of 41 studies had clear definitions of sustainability. Community ownership and mobilization were recognized by many of the reviewed studies as crucial facilitators for intervention sustainability, both early on and after intervention implementation, while social and ecological conditions as well as societal upheavals were barriers that influenced the sustainment of interventions in sub-Saharan Africa. Conclusion: The sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa is inevitable given the double burden of diseases, health care worker shortage, weak health systems, and limited resources. We propose a conceptual framework that draws attention to sustainability as a core component of the overall life cycle of interventions implemented in the region.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number43
JournalImplementation Science
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 23 2016

Fingerprint

Africa South of the Sahara
Health
Communicable Diseases
Ownership
Kenya
Social Conditions
Nigeria
Life Cycle Stages
MEDLINE
Malaria
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
HIV
Delivery of Health Care
Research

Keywords

  • Health interventions
  • Implementations
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Sustainability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Medicine(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Toward the sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa : A systematic review and conceptual framework. / Iwelunmor, Juliet; Blackstone, Sarah; Veira, Dorice; Nwaozuru, Ucheoma; Airhihenbuwa, Collins; Munodawafa, Davison; Kalipeni, Ezekiel; Jutal, Antar; Shelley, Donna; Ogedegbe, Gbenga.

In: Implementation Science, Vol. 11, No. 1, 43, 23.03.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Iwelunmor, J, Blackstone, S, Veira, D, Nwaozuru, U, Airhihenbuwa, C, Munodawafa, D, Kalipeni, E, Jutal, A, Shelley, D & Ogedegbe, G 2016, 'Toward the sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and conceptual framework', Implementation Science, vol. 11, no. 1, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0392-8
Iwelunmor, Juliet ; Blackstone, Sarah ; Veira, Dorice ; Nwaozuru, Ucheoma ; Airhihenbuwa, Collins ; Munodawafa, Davison ; Kalipeni, Ezekiel ; Jutal, Antar ; Shelley, Donna ; Ogedegbe, Gbenga. / Toward the sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa : A systematic review and conceptual framework. In: Implementation Science. 2016 ; Vol. 11, No. 1.
@article{51fd26404ba24fc28269b5827f1ff4df,
title = "Toward the sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and conceptual framework",
abstract = "Background: Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is facing a double burden of disease with a rising prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) while the burden of communicable diseases (CDs) remains high. Despite these challenges, there remains a significant need to understand how or under what conditions health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa are sustained. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of empirical literature to explore how health interventions implemented in SSA are sustained. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Biological Abstracts, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, SCIELO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for available research investigating the sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa. We also used narrative synthesis to examine factors whether positive or negative that may influence the sustainability of health interventions in the region. Results: The search identified 1819 citations, and following removal of duplicates and our inclusion/exclusion criteria, only 41 papers were eligible for inclusion in the review. Twenty-six countries were represented in this review, with Kenya and Nigeria having the most representation of available studies examining sustainability. Study dates ranged from 1996 to 2015. Of note, majority of these studies (30 {\%}) were published in 2014. The most common framework utilized was the sustainability framework, which was discussed in four of the studies. Nineteen out of 41 studies (46 {\%}) reported sustainability outcomes focused on communicable diseases, with HIV and AIDS represented in majority of the studies, followed by malaria. Only 21 out of 41 studies had clear definitions of sustainability. Community ownership and mobilization were recognized by many of the reviewed studies as crucial facilitators for intervention sustainability, both early on and after intervention implementation, while social and ecological conditions as well as societal upheavals were barriers that influenced the sustainment of interventions in sub-Saharan Africa. Conclusion: The sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa is inevitable given the double burden of diseases, health care worker shortage, weak health systems, and limited resources. We propose a conceptual framework that draws attention to sustainability as a core component of the overall life cycle of interventions implemented in the region.",
keywords = "Health interventions, Implementations, Sub-Saharan Africa, Sustainability",
author = "Juliet Iwelunmor and Sarah Blackstone and Dorice Veira and Ucheoma Nwaozuru and Collins Airhihenbuwa and Davison Munodawafa and Ezekiel Kalipeni and Antar Jutal and Donna Shelley and Gbenga Ogedegbe",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1186/s13012-016-0392-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "Implementation Science",
issn = "1748-5908",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward the sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa

T2 - A systematic review and conceptual framework

AU - Iwelunmor, Juliet

AU - Blackstone, Sarah

AU - Veira, Dorice

AU - Nwaozuru, Ucheoma

AU - Airhihenbuwa, Collins

AU - Munodawafa, Davison

AU - Kalipeni, Ezekiel

AU - Jutal, Antar

AU - Shelley, Donna

AU - Ogedegbe, Gbenga

PY - 2016/3/23

Y1 - 2016/3/23

N2 - Background: Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is facing a double burden of disease with a rising prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) while the burden of communicable diseases (CDs) remains high. Despite these challenges, there remains a significant need to understand how or under what conditions health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa are sustained. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of empirical literature to explore how health interventions implemented in SSA are sustained. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Biological Abstracts, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, SCIELO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for available research investigating the sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa. We also used narrative synthesis to examine factors whether positive or negative that may influence the sustainability of health interventions in the region. Results: The search identified 1819 citations, and following removal of duplicates and our inclusion/exclusion criteria, only 41 papers were eligible for inclusion in the review. Twenty-six countries were represented in this review, with Kenya and Nigeria having the most representation of available studies examining sustainability. Study dates ranged from 1996 to 2015. Of note, majority of these studies (30 %) were published in 2014. The most common framework utilized was the sustainability framework, which was discussed in four of the studies. Nineteen out of 41 studies (46 %) reported sustainability outcomes focused on communicable diseases, with HIV and AIDS represented in majority of the studies, followed by malaria. Only 21 out of 41 studies had clear definitions of sustainability. Community ownership and mobilization were recognized by many of the reviewed studies as crucial facilitators for intervention sustainability, both early on and after intervention implementation, while social and ecological conditions as well as societal upheavals were barriers that influenced the sustainment of interventions in sub-Saharan Africa. Conclusion: The sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa is inevitable given the double burden of diseases, health care worker shortage, weak health systems, and limited resources. We propose a conceptual framework that draws attention to sustainability as a core component of the overall life cycle of interventions implemented in the region.

AB - Background: Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is facing a double burden of disease with a rising prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) while the burden of communicable diseases (CDs) remains high. Despite these challenges, there remains a significant need to understand how or under what conditions health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa are sustained. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of empirical literature to explore how health interventions implemented in SSA are sustained. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Biological Abstracts, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, SCIELO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for available research investigating the sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa. We also used narrative synthesis to examine factors whether positive or negative that may influence the sustainability of health interventions in the region. Results: The search identified 1819 citations, and following removal of duplicates and our inclusion/exclusion criteria, only 41 papers were eligible for inclusion in the review. Twenty-six countries were represented in this review, with Kenya and Nigeria having the most representation of available studies examining sustainability. Study dates ranged from 1996 to 2015. Of note, majority of these studies (30 %) were published in 2014. The most common framework utilized was the sustainability framework, which was discussed in four of the studies. Nineteen out of 41 studies (46 %) reported sustainability outcomes focused on communicable diseases, with HIV and AIDS represented in majority of the studies, followed by malaria. Only 21 out of 41 studies had clear definitions of sustainability. Community ownership and mobilization were recognized by many of the reviewed studies as crucial facilitators for intervention sustainability, both early on and after intervention implementation, while social and ecological conditions as well as societal upheavals were barriers that influenced the sustainment of interventions in sub-Saharan Africa. Conclusion: The sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa is inevitable given the double burden of diseases, health care worker shortage, weak health systems, and limited resources. We propose a conceptual framework that draws attention to sustainability as a core component of the overall life cycle of interventions implemented in the region.

KW - Health interventions

KW - Implementations

KW - Sub-Saharan Africa

KW - Sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963615012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963615012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13012-016-0392-8

DO - 10.1186/s13012-016-0392-8

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

SN - 1748-5908

IS - 1

M1 - 43

ER -