Toward a More Public Discussion of the Ethics of Federal Social Program Evaluation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Federal social program evaluation has blossomed over the past quarter century. Despite this growth, there has been little accompanying public debate on research ethics. This essay explores the origins and the implications of this relative silence on ethical matters. It reviews the federal regulations that generally govern research ethics, and recounts the history whereby the evaluation of federal programs was specifically exempted from the purview of those regulations. Through a discussion of a recent evaluation that raised ethical concerns, the essay poses-but does not answer-three questions: (1) Are there good reasons to hold federal social program evaluations to different standards than those that apply to other research?; (2) If so, what ethical standards should be used to assess such evaluations?; and (3) Should a formal mechanism be developed to ensure that federal social program evaluations are conducted ethically?

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSocial Experimentation, Program Evaluation, and Public Policy
PublisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd.
Pages492-512
Number of pages21
ISBN (Print)9781405193931
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 21 2009

Fingerprint

moral philosophy
evaluation
research ethics
regulation
history

Keywords

  • "Common Rule"
  • "marginally needed"
  • "Protection of Human Subjects"
  • "protracted, cumbersome and duplicative"
  • A Caveat
  • A Thought Experiment: Applying the Belmont Principles to a Social Program Evaluation
  • Incorporation of the Report into Federal Policy: Exclusion of Research on Public Social Programs
  • The Belmont Report

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Blustein, J. (2009). Toward a More Public Discussion of the Ethics of Federal Social Program Evaluation. In Social Experimentation, Program Evaluation, and Public Policy (pp. 492-512). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444307399.ch29

Toward a More Public Discussion of the Ethics of Federal Social Program Evaluation. / Blustein, Jan.

Social Experimentation, Program Evaluation, and Public Policy. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2009. p. 492-512.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Blustein, J 2009, Toward a More Public Discussion of the Ethics of Federal Social Program Evaluation. in Social Experimentation, Program Evaluation, and Public Policy. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., pp. 492-512. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444307399.ch29
Blustein J. Toward a More Public Discussion of the Ethics of Federal Social Program Evaluation. In Social Experimentation, Program Evaluation, and Public Policy. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2009. p. 492-512 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444307399.ch29
Blustein, Jan. / Toward a More Public Discussion of the Ethics of Federal Social Program Evaluation. Social Experimentation, Program Evaluation, and Public Policy. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2009. pp. 492-512
@inbook{29d0c653edcf432cbf9c664070d5b7a2,
title = "Toward a More Public Discussion of the Ethics of Federal Social Program Evaluation",
abstract = "Federal social program evaluation has blossomed over the past quarter century. Despite this growth, there has been little accompanying public debate on research ethics. This essay explores the origins and the implications of this relative silence on ethical matters. It reviews the federal regulations that generally govern research ethics, and recounts the history whereby the evaluation of federal programs was specifically exempted from the purview of those regulations. Through a discussion of a recent evaluation that raised ethical concerns, the essay poses-but does not answer-three questions: (1) Are there good reasons to hold federal social program evaluations to different standards than those that apply to other research?; (2) If so, what ethical standards should be used to assess such evaluations?; and (3) Should a formal mechanism be developed to ensure that federal social program evaluations are conducted ethically?",
keywords = "{"}Common Rule{"}, {"}marginally needed{"}, {"}Protection of Human Subjects{"}, {"}protracted, cumbersome and duplicative{"}, A Caveat, A Thought Experiment: Applying the Belmont Principles to a Social Program Evaluation, Incorporation of the Report into Federal Policy: Exclusion of Research on Public Social Programs, The Belmont Report",
author = "Jan Blustein",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1002/9781444307399.ch29",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781405193931",
pages = "492--512",
booktitle = "Social Experimentation, Program Evaluation, and Public Policy",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Toward a More Public Discussion of the Ethics of Federal Social Program Evaluation

AU - Blustein, Jan

PY - 2009/4/21

Y1 - 2009/4/21

N2 - Federal social program evaluation has blossomed over the past quarter century. Despite this growth, there has been little accompanying public debate on research ethics. This essay explores the origins and the implications of this relative silence on ethical matters. It reviews the federal regulations that generally govern research ethics, and recounts the history whereby the evaluation of federal programs was specifically exempted from the purview of those regulations. Through a discussion of a recent evaluation that raised ethical concerns, the essay poses-but does not answer-three questions: (1) Are there good reasons to hold federal social program evaluations to different standards than those that apply to other research?; (2) If so, what ethical standards should be used to assess such evaluations?; and (3) Should a formal mechanism be developed to ensure that federal social program evaluations are conducted ethically?

AB - Federal social program evaluation has blossomed over the past quarter century. Despite this growth, there has been little accompanying public debate on research ethics. This essay explores the origins and the implications of this relative silence on ethical matters. It reviews the federal regulations that generally govern research ethics, and recounts the history whereby the evaluation of federal programs was specifically exempted from the purview of those regulations. Through a discussion of a recent evaluation that raised ethical concerns, the essay poses-but does not answer-three questions: (1) Are there good reasons to hold federal social program evaluations to different standards than those that apply to other research?; (2) If so, what ethical standards should be used to assess such evaluations?; and (3) Should a formal mechanism be developed to ensure that federal social program evaluations are conducted ethically?

KW - "Common Rule"

KW - "marginally needed"

KW - "Protection of Human Subjects"

KW - "protracted, cumbersome and duplicative"

KW - A Caveat

KW - A Thought Experiment: Applying the Belmont Principles to a Social Program Evaluation

KW - Incorporation of the Report into Federal Policy: Exclusion of Research on Public Social Programs

KW - The Belmont Report

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84889349056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84889349056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/9781444307399.ch29

DO - 10.1002/9781444307399.ch29

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84889349056

SN - 9781405193931

SP - 492

EP - 512

BT - Social Experimentation, Program Evaluation, and Public Policy

PB - Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

ER -