Toward a meaningful metric of implicit prejudice

Hart Blanton, James Jaccard, Erin Strauts, Gregory Mitchell, Philip E. Tetlock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The modal distribution of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) is commonly interpreted as showing high levels of implicit prejudice among Americans. These interpretations have fueled calls for changes in organizational and legal practices, but such applications are problematic because the IAT is scored on an arbitrary psychological metric. The present research was designed to make the IAT metric less arbitrary by determining the scores on IAT measures that are associated with observable racial or ethnic bias. By reexamining data from published studies, we found evidence that the IAT metric is "right biased," such that individuals who are behaviorally neutral tend to have positive IAT scores. Current scoring conventions fail to take into account these dynamics and can lead to faulty inferences about the prevalence of implicit prejudice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1468-1481
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume100
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Organizational Innovation
Psychology
Research

Keywords

  • Arbitrary metrics
  • Discrimination
  • Implicit association test
  • Implicit attitudes
  • Prejudice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., Strauts, E., Mitchell, G., & Tetlock, P. E. (2015). Toward a meaningful metric of implicit prejudice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1468-1481. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038379

Toward a meaningful metric of implicit prejudice. / Blanton, Hart; Jaccard, James; Strauts, Erin; Mitchell, Gregory; Tetlock, Philip E.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 100, No. 5, 01.09.2015, p. 1468-1481.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Blanton, H, Jaccard, J, Strauts, E, Mitchell, G & Tetlock, PE 2015, 'Toward a meaningful metric of implicit prejudice', Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 1468-1481. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038379
Blanton, Hart ; Jaccard, James ; Strauts, Erin ; Mitchell, Gregory ; Tetlock, Philip E. / Toward a meaningful metric of implicit prejudice. In: Journal of Applied Psychology. 2015 ; Vol. 100, No. 5. pp. 1468-1481.
@article{b18ed3099c2848b081022d7b6ea5c72c,
title = "Toward a meaningful metric of implicit prejudice",
abstract = "The modal distribution of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) is commonly interpreted as showing high levels of implicit prejudice among Americans. These interpretations have fueled calls for changes in organizational and legal practices, but such applications are problematic because the IAT is scored on an arbitrary psychological metric. The present research was designed to make the IAT metric less arbitrary by determining the scores on IAT measures that are associated with observable racial or ethnic bias. By reexamining data from published studies, we found evidence that the IAT metric is {"}right biased,{"} such that individuals who are behaviorally neutral tend to have positive IAT scores. Current scoring conventions fail to take into account these dynamics and can lead to faulty inferences about the prevalence of implicit prejudice.",
keywords = "Arbitrary metrics, Discrimination, Implicit association test, Implicit attitudes, Prejudice",
author = "Hart Blanton and James Jaccard and Erin Strauts and Gregory Mitchell and Tetlock, {Philip E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/a0038379",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "1468--1481",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a meaningful metric of implicit prejudice

AU - Blanton, Hart

AU - Jaccard, James

AU - Strauts, Erin

AU - Mitchell, Gregory

AU - Tetlock, Philip E.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - The modal distribution of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) is commonly interpreted as showing high levels of implicit prejudice among Americans. These interpretations have fueled calls for changes in organizational and legal practices, but such applications are problematic because the IAT is scored on an arbitrary psychological metric. The present research was designed to make the IAT metric less arbitrary by determining the scores on IAT measures that are associated with observable racial or ethnic bias. By reexamining data from published studies, we found evidence that the IAT metric is "right biased," such that individuals who are behaviorally neutral tend to have positive IAT scores. Current scoring conventions fail to take into account these dynamics and can lead to faulty inferences about the prevalence of implicit prejudice.

AB - The modal distribution of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) is commonly interpreted as showing high levels of implicit prejudice among Americans. These interpretations have fueled calls for changes in organizational and legal practices, but such applications are problematic because the IAT is scored on an arbitrary psychological metric. The present research was designed to make the IAT metric less arbitrary by determining the scores on IAT measures that are associated with observable racial or ethnic bias. By reexamining data from published studies, we found evidence that the IAT metric is "right biased," such that individuals who are behaviorally neutral tend to have positive IAT scores. Current scoring conventions fail to take into account these dynamics and can lead to faulty inferences about the prevalence of implicit prejudice.

KW - Arbitrary metrics

KW - Discrimination

KW - Implicit association test

KW - Implicit attitudes

KW - Prejudice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941170756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941170756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0038379

DO - 10.1037/a0038379

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 1468

EP - 1481

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 5

ER -