Tooth loss in appalachia and the mississippi delta relative to other regions in the united states 1999-2010

Marina Mileo Gorsuch, Seth G. Sanders, Bei Wu

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Objectives. We examined regional variation in tooth loss in the United States from 1999 to 2010. Methods. We used 6 waves of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and data on county characteristics to describe regional trends in tooth loss and decompose diverging trends into the parts explained by individual and county components. Results. Appalachia and the Mississippi Delta had higher levels of tooth loss than the rest of the country in 1999. From 1999 to 2010, tooth loss declined in the United States. However, Appalachia did not converge toward the US average, and the Mississippi Delta worsened relative to the United States. Socioeconomic status explained the largest portion of differences between regions in 1999, but a smaller portion of the trends. The Mississippi Delta is aging more quickly than the rest of the country, which explains 17% of the disparity in the time trend. Conclusions. The disadvantage in tooth loss is persistent in Appalachia and growing in the Mississippi Delta. The increasing disparity is partly explained by changes in the age structure but is also associated with behavioral and environmental factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume104
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Appalachian Region
Mississippi
Tooth Loss
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Social Class

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Tooth loss in appalachia and the mississippi delta relative to other regions in the united states 1999-2010. / Gorsuch, Marina Mileo; Sanders, Seth G.; Wu, Bei.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 104, No. 5, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{6a8d75bd223f4c1f8d2c9973d49dda97,
title = "Tooth loss in appalachia and the mississippi delta relative to other regions in the united states 1999-2010",
abstract = "Objectives. We examined regional variation in tooth loss in the United States from 1999 to 2010. Methods. We used 6 waves of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and data on county characteristics to describe regional trends in tooth loss and decompose diverging trends into the parts explained by individual and county components. Results. Appalachia and the Mississippi Delta had higher levels of tooth loss than the rest of the country in 1999. From 1999 to 2010, tooth loss declined in the United States. However, Appalachia did not converge toward the US average, and the Mississippi Delta worsened relative to the United States. Socioeconomic status explained the largest portion of differences between regions in 1999, but a smaller portion of the trends. The Mississippi Delta is aging more quickly than the rest of the country, which explains 17{\%} of the disparity in the time trend. Conclusions. The disadvantage in tooth loss is persistent in Appalachia and growing in the Mississippi Delta. The increasing disparity is partly explained by changes in the age structure but is also associated with behavioral and environmental factors.",
author = "Gorsuch, {Marina Mileo} and Sanders, {Seth G.} and Bei Wu",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2013.301641",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tooth loss in appalachia and the mississippi delta relative to other regions in the united states 1999-2010

AU - Gorsuch, Marina Mileo

AU - Sanders, Seth G.

AU - Wu, Bei

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objectives. We examined regional variation in tooth loss in the United States from 1999 to 2010. Methods. We used 6 waves of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and data on county characteristics to describe regional trends in tooth loss and decompose diverging trends into the parts explained by individual and county components. Results. Appalachia and the Mississippi Delta had higher levels of tooth loss than the rest of the country in 1999. From 1999 to 2010, tooth loss declined in the United States. However, Appalachia did not converge toward the US average, and the Mississippi Delta worsened relative to the United States. Socioeconomic status explained the largest portion of differences between regions in 1999, but a smaller portion of the trends. The Mississippi Delta is aging more quickly than the rest of the country, which explains 17% of the disparity in the time trend. Conclusions. The disadvantage in tooth loss is persistent in Appalachia and growing in the Mississippi Delta. The increasing disparity is partly explained by changes in the age structure but is also associated with behavioral and environmental factors.

AB - Objectives. We examined regional variation in tooth loss in the United States from 1999 to 2010. Methods. We used 6 waves of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and data on county characteristics to describe regional trends in tooth loss and decompose diverging trends into the parts explained by individual and county components. Results. Appalachia and the Mississippi Delta had higher levels of tooth loss than the rest of the country in 1999. From 1999 to 2010, tooth loss declined in the United States. However, Appalachia did not converge toward the US average, and the Mississippi Delta worsened relative to the United States. Socioeconomic status explained the largest portion of differences between regions in 1999, but a smaller portion of the trends. The Mississippi Delta is aging more quickly than the rest of the country, which explains 17% of the disparity in the time trend. Conclusions. The disadvantage in tooth loss is persistent in Appalachia and growing in the Mississippi Delta. The increasing disparity is partly explained by changes in the age structure but is also associated with behavioral and environmental factors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898606482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898606482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301641

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301641

M3 - Review article

C2 - 24524527

AN - SCOPUS:84898606482

VL - 104

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 5

ER -