Tokamak elongation - How much is too much? Part 2. Numerical results

J. P. Lee, Antoine Cerfon, J. P. Freidberg, M. Greenwald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The analytic theory presented in Paper I is converted into a form convenient for numerical analysis. A fast and accurate code has been written using this numerical formulation. The results are presented by first defining a reference set of physical parameters based on experimental data from high performance discharges. Scaling relations of maximum achievable elongation (Kmax) versus inverse aspect ratio (ϵ) are obtained numerically for various values of poloidal beta (βp), wall radius (b/a) and feedback capability parameter (γτw) in ranges near the reference values. It is also shown that each value of Kmax occurs at a corresponding value of optimized triangularity (δ), whose scaling is also determined as a function of ϵ. The results show that the theoretical predictions of Kmax are slightly higher than experimental observations for high performance discharges, as measured by high average pressure. The theoretical δ values are noticeably lower. We suggest that the explanation is associated with the observation that high performance involves not only n = 0 MHD stability, but also n ≥ 1 MHD modes described by βN in the Troyon limit and transport as characterized by τE. Operation away from the n=0 MHD optimum may still lead to higher performance if there are more than compensatory gains in βN and τE. Unfortunately, while the empirical scaling of βN and τE with the elongation (K) has been determined, the dependence on δ has still not been quantified. This information is needed in order to perform more accurate overall optimizations in future experimental designs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number515810608
JournalJournal of Plasma Physics
Volume81
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

elongation
scaling
numerical analysis
aspect ratio
formulations
optimization
radii
predictions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Condensed Matter Physics

Cite this

Tokamak elongation - How much is too much? Part 2. Numerical results. / Lee, J. P.; Cerfon, Antoine; Freidberg, J. P.; Greenwald, M.

In: Journal of Plasma Physics, Vol. 81, No. 6, 515810608, 01.12.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, J. P. ; Cerfon, Antoine ; Freidberg, J. P. ; Greenwald, M. / Tokamak elongation - How much is too much? Part 2. Numerical results. In: Journal of Plasma Physics. 2015 ; Vol. 81, No. 6.
@article{acd0a252591b4fabb4b871b22116cab4,
title = "Tokamak elongation - How much is too much? Part 2. Numerical results",
abstract = "The analytic theory presented in Paper I is converted into a form convenient for numerical analysis. A fast and accurate code has been written using this numerical formulation. The results are presented by first defining a reference set of physical parameters based on experimental data from high performance discharges. Scaling relations of maximum achievable elongation (Kmax) versus inverse aspect ratio (ϵ) are obtained numerically for various values of poloidal beta (βp), wall radius (b/a) and feedback capability parameter (γτw) in ranges near the reference values. It is also shown that each value of Kmax occurs at a corresponding value of optimized triangularity (δ), whose scaling is also determined as a function of ϵ. The results show that the theoretical predictions of Kmax are slightly higher than experimental observations for high performance discharges, as measured by high average pressure. The theoretical δ values are noticeably lower. We suggest that the explanation is associated with the observation that high performance involves not only n = 0 MHD stability, but also n ≥ 1 MHD modes described by βN in the Troyon limit and transport as characterized by τE. Operation away from the n=0 MHD optimum may still lead to higher performance if there are more than compensatory gains in βN and τE. Unfortunately, while the empirical scaling of βN and τE with the elongation (K) has been determined, the dependence on δ has still not been quantified. This information is needed in order to perform more accurate overall optimizations in future experimental designs.",
author = "Lee, {J. P.} and Antoine Cerfon and Freidberg, {J. P.} and M. Greenwald",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S0022377815001300",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
journal = "Journal of Plasma Physics",
issn = "0022-3778",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tokamak elongation - How much is too much? Part 2. Numerical results

AU - Lee, J. P.

AU - Cerfon, Antoine

AU - Freidberg, J. P.

AU - Greenwald, M.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - The analytic theory presented in Paper I is converted into a form convenient for numerical analysis. A fast and accurate code has been written using this numerical formulation. The results are presented by first defining a reference set of physical parameters based on experimental data from high performance discharges. Scaling relations of maximum achievable elongation (Kmax) versus inverse aspect ratio (ϵ) are obtained numerically for various values of poloidal beta (βp), wall radius (b/a) and feedback capability parameter (γτw) in ranges near the reference values. It is also shown that each value of Kmax occurs at a corresponding value of optimized triangularity (δ), whose scaling is also determined as a function of ϵ. The results show that the theoretical predictions of Kmax are slightly higher than experimental observations for high performance discharges, as measured by high average pressure. The theoretical δ values are noticeably lower. We suggest that the explanation is associated with the observation that high performance involves not only n = 0 MHD stability, but also n ≥ 1 MHD modes described by βN in the Troyon limit and transport as characterized by τE. Operation away from the n=0 MHD optimum may still lead to higher performance if there are more than compensatory gains in βN and τE. Unfortunately, while the empirical scaling of βN and τE with the elongation (K) has been determined, the dependence on δ has still not been quantified. This information is needed in order to perform more accurate overall optimizations in future experimental designs.

AB - The analytic theory presented in Paper I is converted into a form convenient for numerical analysis. A fast and accurate code has been written using this numerical formulation. The results are presented by first defining a reference set of physical parameters based on experimental data from high performance discharges. Scaling relations of maximum achievable elongation (Kmax) versus inverse aspect ratio (ϵ) are obtained numerically for various values of poloidal beta (βp), wall radius (b/a) and feedback capability parameter (γτw) in ranges near the reference values. It is also shown that each value of Kmax occurs at a corresponding value of optimized triangularity (δ), whose scaling is also determined as a function of ϵ. The results show that the theoretical predictions of Kmax are slightly higher than experimental observations for high performance discharges, as measured by high average pressure. The theoretical δ values are noticeably lower. We suggest that the explanation is associated with the observation that high performance involves not only n = 0 MHD stability, but also n ≥ 1 MHD modes described by βN in the Troyon limit and transport as characterized by τE. Operation away from the n=0 MHD optimum may still lead to higher performance if there are more than compensatory gains in βN and τE. Unfortunately, while the empirical scaling of βN and τE with the elongation (K) has been determined, the dependence on δ has still not been quantified. This information is needed in order to perform more accurate overall optimizations in future experimental designs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019459387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019459387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0022377815001300

DO - 10.1017/S0022377815001300

M3 - Article

VL - 81

JO - Journal of Plasma Physics

JF - Journal of Plasma Physics

SN - 0022-3778

IS - 6

M1 - 515810608

ER -