Three shots at prevention: The HPV vaccine and the politics of medicine's simple solutions

Keith Wailoo, Julie Livingston, Steven Epstein, Robert Aronowitz

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

    Abstract

    In 2007, Texas governor Rick Perry issued an executive order requiring that all females entering sixth grade be vaccinated against the human papillomavirus (HPV), igniting national debate that echoed arguments heard across the globe over public policy, sexual health, and the politics of vaccination. Three Shots at Prevention explores the contentious disputes surrounding the controversial vaccine intended to protect against HPV, the most common sexually transmitted infection. When the HPV vaccine first came to the market in 2006, religious conservatives decried the government's approval of the vaccine as implicitly sanctioning teen sex and encouraging promiscuity while advocates applauded its potential to prevent 4,000 cervical cancer deaths in the United States each year. Families worried that laws requiring vaccination reached too far into their private lives. Public health officials wrestled with concerns over whether the drug was too new to be required and whether opposition to it could endanger support for other, widely accepted vaccinations. Many people questioned the aggressive marketing campaigns of the vaccine's creator, Merck & Co. And, since HPV causes cancers of the cervix, vulva, vagina, penis, and anus, why was the vaccine recommended only for females? What did this reveal about gender and sexual politics in the United States? With hundreds of thousands of HPV-related cancer deaths worldwide, how did similar national debates in Europe and the developing world shape the global possibilities of cancer prevention? This volume provides insight into the deep moral, ethical, and scientific questions that must be addressed when sexual and social politics confront public health initiatives in the United States and around the world.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    PublisherJohns Hopkins University Press
    Number of pages320
    ISBN (Print)0801896711, 9780801896729
    StatePublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    cancer
    vaccination
    medicine
    politics
    public health
    death
    privacy
    opposition
    public policy
    marketing
    campaign
    school grade
    drug
    cause
    Law
    gender
    market
    health

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Wailoo, K., Livingston, J., Epstein, S., & Aronowitz, R. (2010). Three shots at prevention: The HPV vaccine and the politics of medicine's simple solutions. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Three shots at prevention : The HPV vaccine and the politics of medicine's simple solutions. / Wailoo, Keith; Livingston, Julie; Epstein, Steven; Aronowitz, Robert.

    Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010. 320 p.

    Research output: Book/ReportBook

    Wailoo, K, Livingston, J, Epstein, S & Aronowitz, R 2010, Three shots at prevention: The HPV vaccine and the politics of medicine's simple solutions. Johns Hopkins University Press.
    Wailoo K, Livingston J, Epstein S, Aronowitz R. Three shots at prevention: The HPV vaccine and the politics of medicine's simple solutions. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010. 320 p.
    Wailoo, Keith ; Livingston, Julie ; Epstein, Steven ; Aronowitz, Robert. / Three shots at prevention : The HPV vaccine and the politics of medicine's simple solutions. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010. 320 p.
    @book{a5b22fc6ae0c49928d16782b6c5cd821,
    title = "Three shots at prevention: The HPV vaccine and the politics of medicine's simple solutions",
    abstract = "In 2007, Texas governor Rick Perry issued an executive order requiring that all females entering sixth grade be vaccinated against the human papillomavirus (HPV), igniting national debate that echoed arguments heard across the globe over public policy, sexual health, and the politics of vaccination. Three Shots at Prevention explores the contentious disputes surrounding the controversial vaccine intended to protect against HPV, the most common sexually transmitted infection. When the HPV vaccine first came to the market in 2006, religious conservatives decried the government's approval of the vaccine as implicitly sanctioning teen sex and encouraging promiscuity while advocates applauded its potential to prevent 4,000 cervical cancer deaths in the United States each year. Families worried that laws requiring vaccination reached too far into their private lives. Public health officials wrestled with concerns over whether the drug was too new to be required and whether opposition to it could endanger support for other, widely accepted vaccinations. Many people questioned the aggressive marketing campaigns of the vaccine's creator, Merck & Co. And, since HPV causes cancers of the cervix, vulva, vagina, penis, and anus, why was the vaccine recommended only for females? What did this reveal about gender and sexual politics in the United States? With hundreds of thousands of HPV-related cancer deaths worldwide, how did similar national debates in Europe and the developing world shape the global possibilities of cancer prevention? This volume provides insight into the deep moral, ethical, and scientific questions that must be addressed when sexual and social politics confront public health initiatives in the United States and around the world.",
    author = "Keith Wailoo and Julie Livingston and Steven Epstein and Robert Aronowitz",
    year = "2010",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "0801896711",
    publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
    address = "United States",

    }

    TY - BOOK

    T1 - Three shots at prevention

    T2 - The HPV vaccine and the politics of medicine's simple solutions

    AU - Wailoo, Keith

    AU - Livingston, Julie

    AU - Epstein, Steven

    AU - Aronowitz, Robert

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - In 2007, Texas governor Rick Perry issued an executive order requiring that all females entering sixth grade be vaccinated against the human papillomavirus (HPV), igniting national debate that echoed arguments heard across the globe over public policy, sexual health, and the politics of vaccination. Three Shots at Prevention explores the contentious disputes surrounding the controversial vaccine intended to protect against HPV, the most common sexually transmitted infection. When the HPV vaccine first came to the market in 2006, religious conservatives decried the government's approval of the vaccine as implicitly sanctioning teen sex and encouraging promiscuity while advocates applauded its potential to prevent 4,000 cervical cancer deaths in the United States each year. Families worried that laws requiring vaccination reached too far into their private lives. Public health officials wrestled with concerns over whether the drug was too new to be required and whether opposition to it could endanger support for other, widely accepted vaccinations. Many people questioned the aggressive marketing campaigns of the vaccine's creator, Merck & Co. And, since HPV causes cancers of the cervix, vulva, vagina, penis, and anus, why was the vaccine recommended only for females? What did this reveal about gender and sexual politics in the United States? With hundreds of thousands of HPV-related cancer deaths worldwide, how did similar national debates in Europe and the developing world shape the global possibilities of cancer prevention? This volume provides insight into the deep moral, ethical, and scientific questions that must be addressed when sexual and social politics confront public health initiatives in the United States and around the world.

    AB - In 2007, Texas governor Rick Perry issued an executive order requiring that all females entering sixth grade be vaccinated against the human papillomavirus (HPV), igniting national debate that echoed arguments heard across the globe over public policy, sexual health, and the politics of vaccination. Three Shots at Prevention explores the contentious disputes surrounding the controversial vaccine intended to protect against HPV, the most common sexually transmitted infection. When the HPV vaccine first came to the market in 2006, religious conservatives decried the government's approval of the vaccine as implicitly sanctioning teen sex and encouraging promiscuity while advocates applauded its potential to prevent 4,000 cervical cancer deaths in the United States each year. Families worried that laws requiring vaccination reached too far into their private lives. Public health officials wrestled with concerns over whether the drug was too new to be required and whether opposition to it could endanger support for other, widely accepted vaccinations. Many people questioned the aggressive marketing campaigns of the vaccine's creator, Merck & Co. And, since HPV causes cancers of the cervix, vulva, vagina, penis, and anus, why was the vaccine recommended only for females? What did this reveal about gender and sexual politics in the United States? With hundreds of thousands of HPV-related cancer deaths worldwide, how did similar national debates in Europe and the developing world shape the global possibilities of cancer prevention? This volume provides insight into the deep moral, ethical, and scientific questions that must be addressed when sexual and social politics confront public health initiatives in the United States and around the world.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894960596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894960596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Book

    AN - SCOPUS:84894960596

    SN - 0801896711

    SN - 9780801896729

    BT - Three shots at prevention

    PB - Johns Hopkins University Press

    ER -