Three challenges for connecting model to mechanism in decision-making

Anne K. Churchland, Roozbeh Kiani

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Recent years have seen a growing interest in understanding the neural mechanisms that support decision-making. The advent of new tools for measuring and manipulating neurons, alongside the inclusion of multiple new animal models and sensory systems has led to the generation of many novel datasets. The potential for these new approaches to constrain decision-making models is unprecedented. Here, we argue that to fully leverage these new approaches, three challenges must be met. First, experimenters must design well-controlled behavioral experiments that make it possible to distinguish competing behavioral strategies. Second, analyses of neural responses should think beyond single neurons, taking into account tradeoffs of single-trial versus trial-averaged approaches. Finally, quantitative model comparisons should be used, but must consider common obstacles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-80
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Volume11
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Neurons
Animal Models
Datasets

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Three challenges for connecting model to mechanism in decision-making. / Churchland, Anne K.; Kiani, Roozbeh.

In: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 11, 01.10.2016, p. 74-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{b56fb51da3bb4f0fb4eccf9fd0394d83,
title = "Three challenges for connecting model to mechanism in decision-making",
abstract = "Recent years have seen a growing interest in understanding the neural mechanisms that support decision-making. The advent of new tools for measuring and manipulating neurons, alongside the inclusion of multiple new animal models and sensory systems has led to the generation of many novel datasets. The potential for these new approaches to constrain decision-making models is unprecedented. Here, we argue that to fully leverage these new approaches, three challenges must be met. First, experimenters must design well-controlled behavioral experiments that make it possible to distinguish competing behavioral strategies. Second, analyses of neural responses should think beyond single neurons, taking into account tradeoffs of single-trial versus trial-averaged approaches. Finally, quantitative model comparisons should be used, but must consider common obstacles.",
author = "Churchland, {Anne K.} and Roozbeh Kiani",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.06.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "74--80",
journal = "Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences",
issn = "2352-1546",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three challenges for connecting model to mechanism in decision-making

AU - Churchland, Anne K.

AU - Kiani, Roozbeh

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Recent years have seen a growing interest in understanding the neural mechanisms that support decision-making. The advent of new tools for measuring and manipulating neurons, alongside the inclusion of multiple new animal models and sensory systems has led to the generation of many novel datasets. The potential for these new approaches to constrain decision-making models is unprecedented. Here, we argue that to fully leverage these new approaches, three challenges must be met. First, experimenters must design well-controlled behavioral experiments that make it possible to distinguish competing behavioral strategies. Second, analyses of neural responses should think beyond single neurons, taking into account tradeoffs of single-trial versus trial-averaged approaches. Finally, quantitative model comparisons should be used, but must consider common obstacles.

AB - Recent years have seen a growing interest in understanding the neural mechanisms that support decision-making. The advent of new tools for measuring and manipulating neurons, alongside the inclusion of multiple new animal models and sensory systems has led to the generation of many novel datasets. The potential for these new approaches to constrain decision-making models is unprecedented. Here, we argue that to fully leverage these new approaches, three challenges must be met. First, experimenters must design well-controlled behavioral experiments that make it possible to distinguish competing behavioral strategies. Second, analyses of neural responses should think beyond single neurons, taking into account tradeoffs of single-trial versus trial-averaged approaches. Finally, quantitative model comparisons should be used, but must consider common obstacles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975529468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975529468&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.06.008

DO - 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.06.008

M3 - Review article

VL - 11

SP - 74

EP - 80

JO - Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

JF - Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

SN - 2352-1546

ER -