Threats and promises: Reputational consequences and transfer of credibility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the reputational consequences of making threats and promises and how they affect subsequent credibility. Eighty-eight high school girls were given predetermined information about the past behavior of their pairmates prior to receiving influence attempts from them. Each first learned that her pairmate had (1) threatened or promised in the past and then learned whether she had (2) fulfilled or failed to fulfill her threat or promise. The subject herself then received a threat or promise from her pairmate. As anticipated, threateners were viewed less favorably than promisers. These impressions were maintained when it was learned that commitments had been fulfilled, but altered decidedly when it was learned that they had not. Credibility or lack of it was found to generalize from threats to promises and from promises to threats only under some conditions. It was concluded that the fit between existing impressions and proclaimed future activity, not a person's record for past reliability, is often the critical determinant of whether or not she is judged to be credible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)310-324
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1974

Fingerprint

credibility
threat
girls' school
commitment
determinants
human being
lack

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Threats and promises : Reputational consequences and transfer of credibility. / Heilman, Madeline.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1974, p. 310-324.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5c4fe1e93493443eb407c990a11186f1,
title = "Threats and promises: Reputational consequences and transfer of credibility",
abstract = "This study was designed to investigate the reputational consequences of making threats and promises and how they affect subsequent credibility. Eighty-eight high school girls were given predetermined information about the past behavior of their pairmates prior to receiving influence attempts from them. Each first learned that her pairmate had (1) threatened or promised in the past and then learned whether she had (2) fulfilled or failed to fulfill her threat or promise. The subject herself then received a threat or promise from her pairmate. As anticipated, threateners were viewed less favorably than promisers. These impressions were maintained when it was learned that commitments had been fulfilled, but altered decidedly when it was learned that they had not. Credibility or lack of it was found to generalize from threats to promises and from promises to threats only under some conditions. It was concluded that the fit between existing impressions and proclaimed future activity, not a person's record for past reliability, is often the critical determinant of whether or not she is judged to be credible.",
author = "Madeline Heilman",
year = "1974",
doi = "10.1016/0022-1031(74)90028-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "310--324",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Threats and promises

T2 - Reputational consequences and transfer of credibility

AU - Heilman, Madeline

PY - 1974

Y1 - 1974

N2 - This study was designed to investigate the reputational consequences of making threats and promises and how they affect subsequent credibility. Eighty-eight high school girls were given predetermined information about the past behavior of their pairmates prior to receiving influence attempts from them. Each first learned that her pairmate had (1) threatened or promised in the past and then learned whether she had (2) fulfilled or failed to fulfill her threat or promise. The subject herself then received a threat or promise from her pairmate. As anticipated, threateners were viewed less favorably than promisers. These impressions were maintained when it was learned that commitments had been fulfilled, but altered decidedly when it was learned that they had not. Credibility or lack of it was found to generalize from threats to promises and from promises to threats only under some conditions. It was concluded that the fit between existing impressions and proclaimed future activity, not a person's record for past reliability, is often the critical determinant of whether or not she is judged to be credible.

AB - This study was designed to investigate the reputational consequences of making threats and promises and how they affect subsequent credibility. Eighty-eight high school girls were given predetermined information about the past behavior of their pairmates prior to receiving influence attempts from them. Each first learned that her pairmate had (1) threatened or promised in the past and then learned whether she had (2) fulfilled or failed to fulfill her threat or promise. The subject herself then received a threat or promise from her pairmate. As anticipated, threateners were viewed less favorably than promisers. These impressions were maintained when it was learned that commitments had been fulfilled, but altered decidedly when it was learned that they had not. Credibility or lack of it was found to generalize from threats to promises and from promises to threats only under some conditions. It was concluded that the fit between existing impressions and proclaimed future activity, not a person's record for past reliability, is often the critical determinant of whether or not she is judged to be credible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0009955794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0009955794&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0022-1031(74)90028-6

DO - 10.1016/0022-1031(74)90028-6

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 310

EP - 324

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

IS - 4

ER -