Theory in social psychology: Seeing the forest and the trees

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The phenomena social psychology seeks to explain - how people think, feel, and act in response to social situations - are rich and diverse. Therefore, explanatory power, the simplicity of a model relative to its empirical scope, is an important desideratum for social psychological theories. A model achieves high explanatory power to the extent that it integrates narrower models within a unified conceptualization, reconciles conflicting findings, and makes novel predictions regarding specific phenomena. This article first relates explanatory power to the various facets of scientific inquiry (modeling, derivation, observation, evaluation, and decision) and then discusses this criterion as a guide for 2 theory-based lines of research my colleagues and I have conducted in the area of social judgment and decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)193-200
Number of pages8
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Review
Volume8
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Psychological Theory
Social Psychology
Decision Making
Observation
Research
Social Theory
Forests

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Theory in social psychology : Seeing the forest and the trees. / Trope, Yaacov.

In: Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2004, p. 193-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{74813d35b9c14f83b6a8f8fd07c9d1fd,
title = "Theory in social psychology: Seeing the forest and the trees",
abstract = "The phenomena social psychology seeks to explain - how people think, feel, and act in response to social situations - are rich and diverse. Therefore, explanatory power, the simplicity of a model relative to its empirical scope, is an important desideratum for social psychological theories. A model achieves high explanatory power to the extent that it integrates narrower models within a unified conceptualization, reconciles conflicting findings, and makes novel predictions regarding specific phenomena. This article first relates explanatory power to the various facets of scientific inquiry (modeling, derivation, observation, evaluation, and decision) and then discusses this criterion as a guide for 2 theory-based lines of research my colleagues and I have conducted in the area of social judgment and decision making.",
author = "Yaacov Trope",
year = "2004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "193--200",
journal = "Personality and Social Psychology Review",
issn = "1088-8683",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theory in social psychology

T2 - Seeing the forest and the trees

AU - Trope, Yaacov

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - The phenomena social psychology seeks to explain - how people think, feel, and act in response to social situations - are rich and diverse. Therefore, explanatory power, the simplicity of a model relative to its empirical scope, is an important desideratum for social psychological theories. A model achieves high explanatory power to the extent that it integrates narrower models within a unified conceptualization, reconciles conflicting findings, and makes novel predictions regarding specific phenomena. This article first relates explanatory power to the various facets of scientific inquiry (modeling, derivation, observation, evaluation, and decision) and then discusses this criterion as a guide for 2 theory-based lines of research my colleagues and I have conducted in the area of social judgment and decision making.

AB - The phenomena social psychology seeks to explain - how people think, feel, and act in response to social situations - are rich and diverse. Therefore, explanatory power, the simplicity of a model relative to its empirical scope, is an important desideratum for social psychological theories. A model achieves high explanatory power to the extent that it integrates narrower models within a unified conceptualization, reconciles conflicting findings, and makes novel predictions regarding specific phenomena. This article first relates explanatory power to the various facets of scientific inquiry (modeling, derivation, observation, evaluation, and decision) and then discusses this criterion as a guide for 2 theory-based lines of research my colleagues and I have conducted in the area of social judgment and decision making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042767910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3042767910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15223519

AN - SCOPUS:3042767910

VL - 8

SP - 193

EP - 200

JO - Personality and Social Psychology Review

JF - Personality and Social Psychology Review

SN - 1088-8683

IS - 2

ER -