Theory-based considerations influence the interpretation of generic sentences

Andrei Cimpian, Susan A. Gelman, Amanda C. Brandone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Under what circumstances do people agree that a kind-referring generic sentence (e.g., 'Swans are beautiful') is true? We hypothesised that theory-based considerations are sufficient, independently of prevalence/frequency information, to lead to acceptance of a generic statement. To provide evidence for this general point, we focused on demonstrating the impact of a specific theorybased, essentialist expectation that the physical features characteristic of a biological kind emerge as a natural product of development on participants' reasoning about generics. Across three studies, adult participants (N 99) confirmed our hypothesis, preferring to map generic sentences (e.g., 'Dontrets have long tails') onto novel categories for which the key feature (e.g., long tails) was absent in all the young but present in all the adults rather than onto novel categories for which the key feature was at least as prevalent but present in some of the young and in some of the adults. Control conditions using 'some' and 'most'-quantified sentences demonstrated that this mapping is specific to generic meaning. These results suggest that generic meaning does not reduce to quantification and is sensitive to theory-based expectations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-276
Number of pages16
JournalLanguage and Cognitive Processes
Volume25
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2010

Fingerprint

Biological Products
interpretation
present
quantification
acceptance
evidence

Keywords

  • Generic language
  • Language comprehension
  • Psychological essentialism
  • Quantifiers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Education
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Theory-based considerations influence the interpretation of generic sentences. / Cimpian, Andrei; Gelman, Susan A.; Brandone, Amanda C.

In: Language and Cognitive Processes, Vol. 25, No. 2, 02.2010, p. 261-276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cimpian, Andrei ; Gelman, Susan A. ; Brandone, Amanda C. / Theory-based considerations influence the interpretation of generic sentences. In: Language and Cognitive Processes. 2010 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 261-276.
@article{7a2b74ecf2184e2caa0270e7f20d960f,
title = "Theory-based considerations influence the interpretation of generic sentences",
abstract = "Under what circumstances do people agree that a kind-referring generic sentence (e.g., 'Swans are beautiful') is true? We hypothesised that theory-based considerations are sufficient, independently of prevalence/frequency information, to lead to acceptance of a generic statement. To provide evidence for this general point, we focused on demonstrating the impact of a specific theorybased, essentialist expectation that the physical features characteristic of a biological kind emerge as a natural product of development on participants' reasoning about generics. Across three studies, adult participants (N 99) confirmed our hypothesis, preferring to map generic sentences (e.g., 'Dontrets have long tails') onto novel categories for which the key feature (e.g., long tails) was absent in all the young but present in all the adults rather than onto novel categories for which the key feature was at least as prevalent but present in some of the young and in some of the adults. Control conditions using 'some' and 'most'-quantified sentences demonstrated that this mapping is specific to generic meaning. These results suggest that generic meaning does not reduce to quantification and is sensitive to theory-based expectations.",
keywords = "Generic language, Language comprehension, Psychological essentialism, Quantifiers",
author = "Andrei Cimpian and Gelman, {Susan A.} and Brandone, {Amanda C.}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1080/01690960903025227",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "261--276",
journal = "Language, Cognition and Neuroscience",
issn = "2327-3798",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theory-based considerations influence the interpretation of generic sentences

AU - Cimpian, Andrei

AU - Gelman, Susan A.

AU - Brandone, Amanda C.

PY - 2010/2

Y1 - 2010/2

N2 - Under what circumstances do people agree that a kind-referring generic sentence (e.g., 'Swans are beautiful') is true? We hypothesised that theory-based considerations are sufficient, independently of prevalence/frequency information, to lead to acceptance of a generic statement. To provide evidence for this general point, we focused on demonstrating the impact of a specific theorybased, essentialist expectation that the physical features characteristic of a biological kind emerge as a natural product of development on participants' reasoning about generics. Across three studies, adult participants (N 99) confirmed our hypothesis, preferring to map generic sentences (e.g., 'Dontrets have long tails') onto novel categories for which the key feature (e.g., long tails) was absent in all the young but present in all the adults rather than onto novel categories for which the key feature was at least as prevalent but present in some of the young and in some of the adults. Control conditions using 'some' and 'most'-quantified sentences demonstrated that this mapping is specific to generic meaning. These results suggest that generic meaning does not reduce to quantification and is sensitive to theory-based expectations.

AB - Under what circumstances do people agree that a kind-referring generic sentence (e.g., 'Swans are beautiful') is true? We hypothesised that theory-based considerations are sufficient, independently of prevalence/frequency information, to lead to acceptance of a generic statement. To provide evidence for this general point, we focused on demonstrating the impact of a specific theorybased, essentialist expectation that the physical features characteristic of a biological kind emerge as a natural product of development on participants' reasoning about generics. Across three studies, adult participants (N 99) confirmed our hypothesis, preferring to map generic sentences (e.g., 'Dontrets have long tails') onto novel categories for which the key feature (e.g., long tails) was absent in all the young but present in all the adults rather than onto novel categories for which the key feature was at least as prevalent but present in some of the young and in some of the adults. Control conditions using 'some' and 'most'-quantified sentences demonstrated that this mapping is specific to generic meaning. These results suggest that generic meaning does not reduce to quantification and is sensitive to theory-based expectations.

KW - Generic language

KW - Language comprehension

KW - Psychological essentialism

KW - Quantifiers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951199308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951199308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01690960903025227

DO - 10.1080/01690960903025227

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77951199308

VL - 25

SP - 261

EP - 276

JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

SN - 2327-3798

IS - 2

ER -