Thematic Analysis of Women's Perspectives on the Meaning of Safety During Hospital-Based Birth

Audrey Lyndon, Jennifer Malana, Laura C. Hedli, Jules Sherman, Henry C. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To explore women's birth experiences to develop an understanding of their perspectives on patient safety during hospital-based birth. Design: Qualitative description using thematic analysis of interview data. Participants: Seventeen women ages 29 to 47 years. Methods: Women participated in individual or small group interviews about their birth experiences, the physical environment, interactions with clinicians, and what safety meant to them in the context of birth. An interdisciplinary group of five investigators from nursing, medicine, product design, and journalism analyzed transcripts thematically to examine how women experienced feeling safe or unsafe and identify opportunities for improvements in care. Results: Participants experienced feelings of safety on a continuum. These feelings were affected by confidence in providers, the environment and organizational factors, interpersonal interactions, and actions people took during risk moments of rapid or confusing change. Well-organized teams and sensitive interpersonal interactions that demonstrated human connection supported feelings of safety, whereas some routine aspects of care threatened feelings of safety. Conclusion: Physical and emotional safety are inextricably embedded in the patient experience, yet this connection may be overlooked in some inpatient birth settings. Clinicians should be mindful of how the birth environment and their behaviors in it can affect a woman's feelings of safety during birth. Human connection is especially important during risk moments, which represent a liminal space at the intersection of physical and emotional safety. At least one team member should focus on the provision of emotional support during rapidly changing situations to mitigate the potential for negative experiences that can result in emotional harm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)324-332
Number of pages9
JournalJOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Parturition
Emotions
Safety
Journalism
Interviews
Patient Safety
Inpatients
Nursing
Research Personnel
Medicine

Keywords

  • labor and birth
  • patient experience
  • patient safety
  • women's health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics
  • Critical Care
  • Maternity and Midwifery

Cite this

Thematic Analysis of Women's Perspectives on the Meaning of Safety During Hospital-Based Birth. / Lyndon, Audrey; Malana, Jennifer; Hedli, Laura C.; Sherman, Jules; Lee, Henry C.

In: JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, Vol. 47, No. 3, 01.05.2018, p. 324-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lyndon, Audrey ; Malana, Jennifer ; Hedli, Laura C. ; Sherman, Jules ; Lee, Henry C. / Thematic Analysis of Women's Perspectives on the Meaning of Safety During Hospital-Based Birth. In: JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing. 2018 ; Vol. 47, No. 3. pp. 324-332.
@article{2f6f5a2ee4dd4dc2b0faa31fe3c451fb,
title = "Thematic Analysis of Women's Perspectives on the Meaning of Safety During Hospital-Based Birth",
abstract = "Objective: To explore women's birth experiences to develop an understanding of their perspectives on patient safety during hospital-based birth. Design: Qualitative description using thematic analysis of interview data. Participants: Seventeen women ages 29 to 47 years. Methods: Women participated in individual or small group interviews about their birth experiences, the physical environment, interactions with clinicians, and what safety meant to them in the context of birth. An interdisciplinary group of five investigators from nursing, medicine, product design, and journalism analyzed transcripts thematically to examine how women experienced feeling safe or unsafe and identify opportunities for improvements in care. Results: Participants experienced feelings of safety on a continuum. These feelings were affected by confidence in providers, the environment and organizational factors, interpersonal interactions, and actions people took during risk moments of rapid or confusing change. Well-organized teams and sensitive interpersonal interactions that demonstrated human connection supported feelings of safety, whereas some routine aspects of care threatened feelings of safety. Conclusion: Physical and emotional safety are inextricably embedded in the patient experience, yet this connection may be overlooked in some inpatient birth settings. Clinicians should be mindful of how the birth environment and their behaviors in it can affect a woman's feelings of safety during birth. Human connection is especially important during risk moments, which represent a liminal space at the intersection of physical and emotional safety. At least one team member should focus on the provision of emotional support during rapidly changing situations to mitigate the potential for negative experiences that can result in emotional harm.",
keywords = "labor and birth, patient experience, patient safety, women's health",
author = "Audrey Lyndon and Jennifer Malana and Hedli, {Laura C.} and Jules Sherman and Lee, {Henry C.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jogn.2018.02.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "324--332",
journal = "JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing",
issn = "0884-2175",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thematic Analysis of Women's Perspectives on the Meaning of Safety During Hospital-Based Birth

AU - Lyndon, Audrey

AU - Malana, Jennifer

AU - Hedli, Laura C.

AU - Sherman, Jules

AU - Lee, Henry C.

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Objective: To explore women's birth experiences to develop an understanding of their perspectives on patient safety during hospital-based birth. Design: Qualitative description using thematic analysis of interview data. Participants: Seventeen women ages 29 to 47 years. Methods: Women participated in individual or small group interviews about their birth experiences, the physical environment, interactions with clinicians, and what safety meant to them in the context of birth. An interdisciplinary group of five investigators from nursing, medicine, product design, and journalism analyzed transcripts thematically to examine how women experienced feeling safe or unsafe and identify opportunities for improvements in care. Results: Participants experienced feelings of safety on a continuum. These feelings were affected by confidence in providers, the environment and organizational factors, interpersonal interactions, and actions people took during risk moments of rapid or confusing change. Well-organized teams and sensitive interpersonal interactions that demonstrated human connection supported feelings of safety, whereas some routine aspects of care threatened feelings of safety. Conclusion: Physical and emotional safety are inextricably embedded in the patient experience, yet this connection may be overlooked in some inpatient birth settings. Clinicians should be mindful of how the birth environment and their behaviors in it can affect a woman's feelings of safety during birth. Human connection is especially important during risk moments, which represent a liminal space at the intersection of physical and emotional safety. At least one team member should focus on the provision of emotional support during rapidly changing situations to mitigate the potential for negative experiences that can result in emotional harm.

AB - Objective: To explore women's birth experiences to develop an understanding of their perspectives on patient safety during hospital-based birth. Design: Qualitative description using thematic analysis of interview data. Participants: Seventeen women ages 29 to 47 years. Methods: Women participated in individual or small group interviews about their birth experiences, the physical environment, interactions with clinicians, and what safety meant to them in the context of birth. An interdisciplinary group of five investigators from nursing, medicine, product design, and journalism analyzed transcripts thematically to examine how women experienced feeling safe or unsafe and identify opportunities for improvements in care. Results: Participants experienced feelings of safety on a continuum. These feelings were affected by confidence in providers, the environment and organizational factors, interpersonal interactions, and actions people took during risk moments of rapid or confusing change. Well-organized teams and sensitive interpersonal interactions that demonstrated human connection supported feelings of safety, whereas some routine aspects of care threatened feelings of safety. Conclusion: Physical and emotional safety are inextricably embedded in the patient experience, yet this connection may be overlooked in some inpatient birth settings. Clinicians should be mindful of how the birth environment and their behaviors in it can affect a woman's feelings of safety during birth. Human connection is especially important during risk moments, which represent a liminal space at the intersection of physical and emotional safety. At least one team member should focus on the provision of emotional support during rapidly changing situations to mitigate the potential for negative experiences that can result in emotional harm.

KW - labor and birth

KW - patient experience

KW - patient safety

KW - women's health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046655332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046655332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jogn.2018.02.008

DO - 10.1016/j.jogn.2018.02.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 29551397

AN - SCOPUS:85046655332

VL - 47

SP - 324

EP - 332

JO - JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing

JF - JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing

SN - 0884-2175

IS - 3

ER -