Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses

M. Cikara, E. Bruneau, Jay Van Bavel, R. Saxe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Despite its early origins and adaptive functions, empathy is not inevitable; people routinely fail to empathize with others, especially members of different social or cultural groups. In five experiments, we systematically explore how social identity, functional relations between groups, competitive threat, and perceived entitativity contribute to intergroup empathy bias: the tendency not only to empathize less with out-group relative to in-group members, but also to feel pleasure in response to their pain (and pain in response to their pleasure). When teams are set in direct competition, affective responses to competition-irrelevant events are characterized not only by less empathy toward out-group relative to in-group members, but also by increased counter-empathic responses: Schadenfreude and Glückschmerz (Experiment 1). Comparing responses to in-group and out-group targets against responses to unaffiliated targets in this competitive context suggests that intergroup empathy bias may be better characterized by out-group antipathy rather than extraordinary in-group empathy (Experiment 2). We also find that intergroup empathy bias is robust to changes in relative group standing-feedback indicating that the out-group has fallen behind (Experiment 3a) or is no longer a competitive threat (Experiment 3b) does not reduce the bias. However, reducing perceived in-group and out-group entitativity can significantly attenuate intergroup empathy bias (Experiment 4). This research establishes the boundary conditions of intergroup empathy bias and provides initial support for a more integrative framework of group-based empathy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)110-125
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume55
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Pleasure
empathy
pain
outgroup
Pain
experiment
trend
Group
group membership
threat
group relations
Social Identification
event

Keywords

  • Competition
  • Conflict
  • Empathy
  • Intergroup
  • Schadenfreude
  • Social identity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Their pain gives us pleasure : How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses. / Cikara, M.; Bruneau, E.; Van Bavel, Jay; Saxe, R.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 55, 2014, p. 110-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{68ffbb21d98d413587dd4aa6059d5b0c,
title = "Their pain gives us pleasure: How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses",
abstract = "Despite its early origins and adaptive functions, empathy is not inevitable; people routinely fail to empathize with others, especially members of different social or cultural groups. In five experiments, we systematically explore how social identity, functional relations between groups, competitive threat, and perceived entitativity contribute to intergroup empathy bias: the tendency not only to empathize less with out-group relative to in-group members, but also to feel pleasure in response to their pain (and pain in response to their pleasure). When teams are set in direct competition, affective responses to competition-irrelevant events are characterized not only by less empathy toward out-group relative to in-group members, but also by increased counter-empathic responses: Schadenfreude and Gl{\"u}ckschmerz (Experiment 1). Comparing responses to in-group and out-group targets against responses to unaffiliated targets in this competitive context suggests that intergroup empathy bias may be better characterized by out-group antipathy rather than extraordinary in-group empathy (Experiment 2). We also find that intergroup empathy bias is robust to changes in relative group standing-feedback indicating that the out-group has fallen behind (Experiment 3a) or is no longer a competitive threat (Experiment 3b) does not reduce the bias. However, reducing perceived in-group and out-group entitativity can significantly attenuate intergroup empathy bias (Experiment 4). This research establishes the boundary conditions of intergroup empathy bias and provides initial support for a more integrative framework of group-based empathy.",
keywords = "Competition, Conflict, Empathy, Intergroup, Schadenfreude, Social identity",
author = "M. Cikara and E. Bruneau and {Van Bavel}, Jay and R. Saxe",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "110--125",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Their pain gives us pleasure

T2 - How intergroup dynamics shape empathic failures and counter-empathic responses

AU - Cikara, M.

AU - Bruneau, E.

AU - Van Bavel, Jay

AU - Saxe, R.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Despite its early origins and adaptive functions, empathy is not inevitable; people routinely fail to empathize with others, especially members of different social or cultural groups. In five experiments, we systematically explore how social identity, functional relations between groups, competitive threat, and perceived entitativity contribute to intergroup empathy bias: the tendency not only to empathize less with out-group relative to in-group members, but also to feel pleasure in response to their pain (and pain in response to their pleasure). When teams are set in direct competition, affective responses to competition-irrelevant events are characterized not only by less empathy toward out-group relative to in-group members, but also by increased counter-empathic responses: Schadenfreude and Glückschmerz (Experiment 1). Comparing responses to in-group and out-group targets against responses to unaffiliated targets in this competitive context suggests that intergroup empathy bias may be better characterized by out-group antipathy rather than extraordinary in-group empathy (Experiment 2). We also find that intergroup empathy bias is robust to changes in relative group standing-feedback indicating that the out-group has fallen behind (Experiment 3a) or is no longer a competitive threat (Experiment 3b) does not reduce the bias. However, reducing perceived in-group and out-group entitativity can significantly attenuate intergroup empathy bias (Experiment 4). This research establishes the boundary conditions of intergroup empathy bias and provides initial support for a more integrative framework of group-based empathy.

AB - Despite its early origins and adaptive functions, empathy is not inevitable; people routinely fail to empathize with others, especially members of different social or cultural groups. In five experiments, we systematically explore how social identity, functional relations between groups, competitive threat, and perceived entitativity contribute to intergroup empathy bias: the tendency not only to empathize less with out-group relative to in-group members, but also to feel pleasure in response to their pain (and pain in response to their pleasure). When teams are set in direct competition, affective responses to competition-irrelevant events are characterized not only by less empathy toward out-group relative to in-group members, but also by increased counter-empathic responses: Schadenfreude and Glückschmerz (Experiment 1). Comparing responses to in-group and out-group targets against responses to unaffiliated targets in this competitive context suggests that intergroup empathy bias may be better characterized by out-group antipathy rather than extraordinary in-group empathy (Experiment 2). We also find that intergroup empathy bias is robust to changes in relative group standing-feedback indicating that the out-group has fallen behind (Experiment 3a) or is no longer a competitive threat (Experiment 3b) does not reduce the bias. However, reducing perceived in-group and out-group entitativity can significantly attenuate intergroup empathy bias (Experiment 4). This research establishes the boundary conditions of intergroup empathy bias and provides initial support for a more integrative framework of group-based empathy.

KW - Competition

KW - Conflict

KW - Empathy

KW - Intergroup

KW - Schadenfreude

KW - Social identity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903884979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903884979&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84903884979

VL - 55

SP - 110

EP - 125

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

ER -