The worldwide economic impact of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 1793-1815

Kevin O'Rourke

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

The paper provides a comparative history of the economic impact of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars. By focusing on the relative price evidence, it is possible to show that the conflict had major economic effects around the world. Britain's control of the seas meant that it was much less affected than other belligerent nations, such as France and the United States. The fact that this conflict had such large price effects around the world suggests a highly inter-connected international economy, but is also consistent with the hypothesis that mercantilist conflicts prevented the emergence of more pronounced commodity market integration during the eighteenth century. The war had several longer-run effects which both helped and hindered the integration of international commodity markets during the nineteenth century.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-149
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Global History
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2006

Fingerprint

economic impact
commodity market
eighteenth century
nineteenth century
France
economy
history
evidence
economics
Economics
Napoleonic Wars
Revolution
Commodities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • History
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The worldwide economic impact of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 1793-1815. / O'Rourke, Kevin.

In: Journal of Global History, Vol. 1, No. 1, 01.12.2006, p. 123-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{c4771cd5d26040c48f2c0b0d756d4fb7,
title = "The worldwide economic impact of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 1793-1815",
abstract = "The paper provides a comparative history of the economic impact of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars. By focusing on the relative price evidence, it is possible to show that the conflict had major economic effects around the world. Britain's control of the seas meant that it was much less affected than other belligerent nations, such as France and the United States. The fact that this conflict had such large price effects around the world suggests a highly inter-connected international economy, but is also consistent with the hypothesis that mercantilist conflicts prevented the emergence of more pronounced commodity market integration during the eighteenth century. The war had several longer-run effects which both helped and hindered the integration of international commodity markets during the nineteenth century.",
author = "Kevin O'Rourke",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1740022806000076",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "123--149",
journal = "Journal of Global History",
issn = "1740-0228",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The worldwide economic impact of the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 1793-1815

AU - O'Rourke, Kevin

PY - 2006/12/1

Y1 - 2006/12/1

N2 - The paper provides a comparative history of the economic impact of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars. By focusing on the relative price evidence, it is possible to show that the conflict had major economic effects around the world. Britain's control of the seas meant that it was much less affected than other belligerent nations, such as France and the United States. The fact that this conflict had such large price effects around the world suggests a highly inter-connected international economy, but is also consistent with the hypothesis that mercantilist conflicts prevented the emergence of more pronounced commodity market integration during the eighteenth century. The war had several longer-run effects which both helped and hindered the integration of international commodity markets during the nineteenth century.

AB - The paper provides a comparative history of the economic impact of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars. By focusing on the relative price evidence, it is possible to show that the conflict had major economic effects around the world. Britain's control of the seas meant that it was much less affected than other belligerent nations, such as France and the United States. The fact that this conflict had such large price effects around the world suggests a highly inter-connected international economy, but is also consistent with the hypothesis that mercantilist conflicts prevented the emergence of more pronounced commodity market integration during the eighteenth century. The war had several longer-run effects which both helped and hindered the integration of international commodity markets during the nineteenth century.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249895977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249895977&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1740022806000076

DO - 10.1017/S1740022806000076

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:34249895977

VL - 1

SP - 123

EP - 149

JO - Journal of Global History

JF - Journal of Global History

SN - 1740-0228

IS - 1

ER -