The World Cities Project: Rationale, organization, and design for comparison of megacity health systems

Victor G. Rodwin, Michael K. Gusmano

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

This article provides an overview of the World Cities Project (WCP), our rationale for it, our framework for comparative analysis, and an overview of current studies in progress. The WCP uses New York, London, Paris, and Tokyo as a laboratory in which to study urban health, particularly the evolution and current organization of public health infrastructure, as well as the health status and quality of life in these cities. Comparing world cities in wealthier nations is important because of (1) global trends in urbanization, emerging health risks, and population aging; (2) the dominant influence of these cities on "megacities" of developing nations; and (3) the existence of data and scholarship about these world cities, which provides a foundation for comparing their health systems and health. We argue that, in contrast to nation-states, world cities provide opportunities for more refined comparisons and cross-national learning. To provide a framework for WCP, we define an urban core for each city and examine the similarities and differences among them. Our current studies shed light on inequalities in health care use and health status, the importance of neighborhoods in protecting population health, and quality of life in diverse urban communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)445-463
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Urban Health
Volume79
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2002

Fingerprint

project organization
megacity
Organizations
Health
health
health status
quality of life
health risk
nation state
urbanization
Health Status
public health
health care
infrastructure
Quality of Life
Healthcare Disparities
organization
Urban Health
Urbanization
trend

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

The World Cities Project : Rationale, organization, and design for comparison of megacity health systems. / Rodwin, Victor G.; Gusmano, Michael K.

In: Journal of Urban Health, Vol. 79, No. 4, 12.2002, p. 445-463.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{438154c77c584e4b8796593df191bd26,
title = "The World Cities Project: Rationale, organization, and design for comparison of megacity health systems",
abstract = "This article provides an overview of the World Cities Project (WCP), our rationale for it, our framework for comparative analysis, and an overview of current studies in progress. The WCP uses New York, London, Paris, and Tokyo as a laboratory in which to study urban health, particularly the evolution and current organization of public health infrastructure, as well as the health status and quality of life in these cities. Comparing world cities in wealthier nations is important because of (1) global trends in urbanization, emerging health risks, and population aging; (2) the dominant influence of these cities on {"}megacities{"} of developing nations; and (3) the existence of data and scholarship about these world cities, which provides a foundation for comparing their health systems and health. We argue that, in contrast to nation-states, world cities provide opportunities for more refined comparisons and cross-national learning. To provide a framework for WCP, we define an urban core for each city and examine the similarities and differences among them. Our current studies shed light on inequalities in health care use and health status, the importance of neighborhoods in protecting population health, and quality of life in diverse urban communities.",
author = "Rodwin, {Victor G.} and Gusmano, {Michael K.}",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1093/jurban/79.4.445",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "445--463",
journal = "Journal of Urban Health",
issn = "1099-3460",
publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The World Cities Project

T2 - Rationale, organization, and design for comparison of megacity health systems

AU - Rodwin, Victor G.

AU - Gusmano, Michael K.

PY - 2002/12

Y1 - 2002/12

N2 - This article provides an overview of the World Cities Project (WCP), our rationale for it, our framework for comparative analysis, and an overview of current studies in progress. The WCP uses New York, London, Paris, and Tokyo as a laboratory in which to study urban health, particularly the evolution and current organization of public health infrastructure, as well as the health status and quality of life in these cities. Comparing world cities in wealthier nations is important because of (1) global trends in urbanization, emerging health risks, and population aging; (2) the dominant influence of these cities on "megacities" of developing nations; and (3) the existence of data and scholarship about these world cities, which provides a foundation for comparing their health systems and health. We argue that, in contrast to nation-states, world cities provide opportunities for more refined comparisons and cross-national learning. To provide a framework for WCP, we define an urban core for each city and examine the similarities and differences among them. Our current studies shed light on inequalities in health care use and health status, the importance of neighborhoods in protecting population health, and quality of life in diverse urban communities.

AB - This article provides an overview of the World Cities Project (WCP), our rationale for it, our framework for comparative analysis, and an overview of current studies in progress. The WCP uses New York, London, Paris, and Tokyo as a laboratory in which to study urban health, particularly the evolution and current organization of public health infrastructure, as well as the health status and quality of life in these cities. Comparing world cities in wealthier nations is important because of (1) global trends in urbanization, emerging health risks, and population aging; (2) the dominant influence of these cities on "megacities" of developing nations; and (3) the existence of data and scholarship about these world cities, which provides a foundation for comparing their health systems and health. We argue that, in contrast to nation-states, world cities provide opportunities for more refined comparisons and cross-national learning. To provide a framework for WCP, we define an urban core for each city and examine the similarities and differences among them. Our current studies shed light on inequalities in health care use and health status, the importance of neighborhoods in protecting population health, and quality of life in diverse urban communities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036945704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036945704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jurban/79.4.445

DO - 10.1093/jurban/79.4.445

M3 - Review article

C2 - 12468666

AN - SCOPUS:0036945704

VL - 79

SP - 445

EP - 463

JO - Journal of Urban Health

JF - Journal of Urban Health

SN - 1099-3460

IS - 4

ER -