The welfare effects of nudges: A case study of energy use social comparisons

Hunt Allcott, Judd B. Kessler

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    "Nudge"-style interventions are often deemed successful if they generate large behavior change at low cost, but they are rarely subjected to full social welfare evaluations. We combine a field experiment with a simple theoretical framework to evaluate the welfare effects of one especially policy-relevant intervention, home energy social comparison reports. In our sample, the reports increase social welfare, although traditional evaluation approaches overstate gains because they ignore significant costs incurred by nudge recipients. Overall, home energy report welfare gains might be overstated by $620 million. We develop a prediction algorithm for optimal targeting; this approach would double the welfare gains.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)236-276
    Number of pages41
    JournalAmerican Economic Journal: Applied Economics
    Volume11
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

    Fingerprint

    Welfare gains
    Energy
    Social comparison
    Welfare effects
    Social welfare
    Costs
    Energy use
    Evaluation
    Prediction
    Targeting
    Field experiment
    Behavior change
    Theoretical framework

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

    Cite this

    The welfare effects of nudges : A case study of energy use social comparisons. / Allcott, Hunt; Kessler, Judd B.

    In: American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 236-276.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{903d0aeee0e9422a98cf1a71b057c078,
    title = "The welfare effects of nudges: A case study of energy use social comparisons",
    abstract = "{"}Nudge{"}-style interventions are often deemed successful if they generate large behavior change at low cost, but they are rarely subjected to full social welfare evaluations. We combine a field experiment with a simple theoretical framework to evaluate the welfare effects of one especially policy-relevant intervention, home energy social comparison reports. In our sample, the reports increase social welfare, although traditional evaluation approaches overstate gains because they ignore significant costs incurred by nudge recipients. Overall, home energy report welfare gains might be overstated by $620 million. We develop a prediction algorithm for optimal targeting; this approach would double the welfare gains.",
    author = "Hunt Allcott and Kessler, {Judd B.}",
    year = "2019",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1257/app.20170328",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "11",
    pages = "236--276",
    journal = "American Economic Journal: Applied Economics",
    issn = "1945-7782",
    publisher = "American Economic Association",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The welfare effects of nudges

    T2 - A case study of energy use social comparisons

    AU - Allcott, Hunt

    AU - Kessler, Judd B.

    PY - 2019/1/1

    Y1 - 2019/1/1

    N2 - "Nudge"-style interventions are often deemed successful if they generate large behavior change at low cost, but they are rarely subjected to full social welfare evaluations. We combine a field experiment with a simple theoretical framework to evaluate the welfare effects of one especially policy-relevant intervention, home energy social comparison reports. In our sample, the reports increase social welfare, although traditional evaluation approaches overstate gains because they ignore significant costs incurred by nudge recipients. Overall, home energy report welfare gains might be overstated by $620 million. We develop a prediction algorithm for optimal targeting; this approach would double the welfare gains.

    AB - "Nudge"-style interventions are often deemed successful if they generate large behavior change at low cost, but they are rarely subjected to full social welfare evaluations. We combine a field experiment with a simple theoretical framework to evaluate the welfare effects of one especially policy-relevant intervention, home energy social comparison reports. In our sample, the reports increase social welfare, although traditional evaluation approaches overstate gains because they ignore significant costs incurred by nudge recipients. Overall, home energy report welfare gains might be overstated by $620 million. We develop a prediction algorithm for optimal targeting; this approach would double the welfare gains.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062553355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062553355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1257/app.20170328

    DO - 10.1257/app.20170328

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85062553355

    VL - 11

    SP - 236

    EP - 276

    JO - American Economic Journal: Applied Economics

    JF - American Economic Journal: Applied Economics

    SN - 1945-7782

    IS - 1

    ER -