The War Trap Revisited

A Revised Expected Utility Model

Bruce Bueno De Mesquita

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The expected utility framework developed in The War Trap is revised to correct several deficiencies. Risk-taking orientations are now treated as an integral part of the model by introducing concavity or convexity into the utility functions. The zero-sum properties of the theory are largely eliminated, and the tendency toward interpersonal comparisons of utility is removed. Several earlier results are replicated with the new model, and with annual capabilities data. New propositions are deduced that identify important limitations on conflict initiation, and relationships resulting from differences in perceptions are tested. Support is found for the contention that the revised version of the theory, of which the original model is a special case, is a powerful tool for integrating many extant hypotheses about conflict and for explaining a substantial portion of the tendency for some threats to escalate to violence or warfare and for others to be resolved peacefully.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)156-177
    Number of pages22
    JournalAmerican Political Science Review
    Volume79
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1985

    Fingerprint

    warfare
    threat
    violence

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    The War Trap Revisited : A Revised Expected Utility Model. / Bueno De Mesquita, Bruce.

    In: American Political Science Review, Vol. 79, No. 1, 1985, p. 156-177.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Bueno De Mesquita, Bruce. / The War Trap Revisited : A Revised Expected Utility Model. In: American Political Science Review. 1985 ; Vol. 79, No. 1. pp. 156-177.
    @article{b01dc93dded74748af5fdf38ac6a90f1,
    title = "The War Trap Revisited: A Revised Expected Utility Model",
    abstract = "The expected utility framework developed in The War Trap is revised to correct several deficiencies. Risk-taking orientations are now treated as an integral part of the model by introducing concavity or convexity into the utility functions. The zero-sum properties of the theory are largely eliminated, and the tendency toward interpersonal comparisons of utility is removed. Several earlier results are replicated with the new model, and with annual capabilities data. New propositions are deduced that identify important limitations on conflict initiation, and relationships resulting from differences in perceptions are tested. Support is found for the contention that the revised version of the theory, of which the original model is a special case, is a powerful tool for integrating many extant hypotheses about conflict and for explaining a substantial portion of the tendency for some threats to escalate to violence or warfare and for others to be resolved peacefully.",
    author = "{Bueno De Mesquita}, Bruce",
    year = "1985",
    doi = "10.2307/1956125",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "79",
    pages = "156--177",
    journal = "American Political Science Review",
    issn = "0003-0554",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The War Trap Revisited

    T2 - A Revised Expected Utility Model

    AU - Bueno De Mesquita, Bruce

    PY - 1985

    Y1 - 1985

    N2 - The expected utility framework developed in The War Trap is revised to correct several deficiencies. Risk-taking orientations are now treated as an integral part of the model by introducing concavity or convexity into the utility functions. The zero-sum properties of the theory are largely eliminated, and the tendency toward interpersonal comparisons of utility is removed. Several earlier results are replicated with the new model, and with annual capabilities data. New propositions are deduced that identify important limitations on conflict initiation, and relationships resulting from differences in perceptions are tested. Support is found for the contention that the revised version of the theory, of which the original model is a special case, is a powerful tool for integrating many extant hypotheses about conflict and for explaining a substantial portion of the tendency for some threats to escalate to violence or warfare and for others to be resolved peacefully.

    AB - The expected utility framework developed in The War Trap is revised to correct several deficiencies. Risk-taking orientations are now treated as an integral part of the model by introducing concavity or convexity into the utility functions. The zero-sum properties of the theory are largely eliminated, and the tendency toward interpersonal comparisons of utility is removed. Several earlier results are replicated with the new model, and with annual capabilities data. New propositions are deduced that identify important limitations on conflict initiation, and relationships resulting from differences in perceptions are tested. Support is found for the contention that the revised version of the theory, of which the original model is a special case, is a powerful tool for integrating many extant hypotheses about conflict and for explaining a substantial portion of the tendency for some threats to escalate to violence or warfare and for others to be resolved peacefully.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84973992820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84973992820&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.2307/1956125

    DO - 10.2307/1956125

    M3 - Article

    VL - 79

    SP - 156

    EP - 177

    JO - American Political Science Review

    JF - American Political Science Review

    SN - 0003-0554

    IS - 1

    ER -