The War on Drugs That Wasn’t: Wasted Whiteness, “Dirty Doctors,” and Race in Media Coverage of Prescription Opioid Misuse

Julie Netherland, Helena Hansen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The past decade in the U.S. has been marked by a media fascination with the white prescription opioid cum heroin user. In this paper, we contrast media coverage of white non-medical opioid users with that of black and brown heroin users to show how divergent representations lead to different public and policy responses. A content analysis of 100 popular press articles from 2001 and 2011 in which half describe heroin users and half describe prescription opioid users revealed a consistent contrast between criminalized urban black and Latino heroin injectors with sympathetic portrayals of suburban white prescription opioid users. Media coverage of the suburban and rural opioid “epidemic” of the 2000s helped draw a symbolic, and then legal, distinction between (urban) heroin addiction and (suburban and rural) prescription opioid addiction that is reminiscent of the legal distinction between crack cocaine and powder cocaine of the 1980s and 1990s. This distinction reinforces the racialized deployment of the War on Drugs and is sustained by the lack of explicit discussion of race in the service of “color blind ideology.” We suggest potential correctives to these racially divergent patterns, in the form of socially responsible media practices and of clinical engagement with public policy.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)664-686
    Number of pages23
    JournalCulture, Medicine and Psychiatry
    Volume40
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    Opioid Analgesics
    Prescriptions
    medication
    coverage
    Heroin
    drug
    Pharmaceutical Preparations
    Public Policy
    Crack Cocaine
    Heroin Dependence
    popular press
    drug dependence
    Cocaine
    Hispanic Americans
    addiction
    Powders
    Contrast Media
    Warfare
    Doctors
    Prescription

    Keywords

    • Addiction
    • Heroin
    • Media
    • Prescription opioids
    • Whiteness

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Health(social science)
    • Anthropology
    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Cite this

    The War on Drugs That Wasn’t : Wasted Whiteness, “Dirty Doctors,” and Race in Media Coverage of Prescription Opioid Misuse. / Netherland, Julie; Hansen, Helena.

    In: Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, Vol. 40, No. 4, 01.12.2016, p. 664-686.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{df733b2e81884966804f022a093842c9,
    title = "The War on Drugs That Wasn’t: Wasted Whiteness, “Dirty Doctors,” and Race in Media Coverage of Prescription Opioid Misuse",
    abstract = "The past decade in the U.S. has been marked by a media fascination with the white prescription opioid cum heroin user. In this paper, we contrast media coverage of white non-medical opioid users with that of black and brown heroin users to show how divergent representations lead to different public and policy responses. A content analysis of 100 popular press articles from 2001 and 2011 in which half describe heroin users and half describe prescription opioid users revealed a consistent contrast between criminalized urban black and Latino heroin injectors with sympathetic portrayals of suburban white prescription opioid users. Media coverage of the suburban and rural opioid “epidemic” of the 2000s helped draw a symbolic, and then legal, distinction between (urban) heroin addiction and (suburban and rural) prescription opioid addiction that is reminiscent of the legal distinction between crack cocaine and powder cocaine of the 1980s and 1990s. This distinction reinforces the racialized deployment of the War on Drugs and is sustained by the lack of explicit discussion of race in the service of “color blind ideology.” We suggest potential correctives to these racially divergent patterns, in the form of socially responsible media practices and of clinical engagement with public policy.",
    keywords = "Addiction, Heroin, Media, Prescription opioids, Whiteness",
    author = "Julie Netherland and Helena Hansen",
    year = "2016",
    month = "12",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/s11013-016-9496-5",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "40",
    pages = "664--686",
    journal = "Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry",
    issn = "0165-005X",
    publisher = "Springer New York",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The War on Drugs That Wasn’t

    T2 - Wasted Whiteness, “Dirty Doctors,” and Race in Media Coverage of Prescription Opioid Misuse

    AU - Netherland, Julie

    AU - Hansen, Helena

    PY - 2016/12/1

    Y1 - 2016/12/1

    N2 - The past decade in the U.S. has been marked by a media fascination with the white prescription opioid cum heroin user. In this paper, we contrast media coverage of white non-medical opioid users with that of black and brown heroin users to show how divergent representations lead to different public and policy responses. A content analysis of 100 popular press articles from 2001 and 2011 in which half describe heroin users and half describe prescription opioid users revealed a consistent contrast between criminalized urban black and Latino heroin injectors with sympathetic portrayals of suburban white prescription opioid users. Media coverage of the suburban and rural opioid “epidemic” of the 2000s helped draw a symbolic, and then legal, distinction between (urban) heroin addiction and (suburban and rural) prescription opioid addiction that is reminiscent of the legal distinction between crack cocaine and powder cocaine of the 1980s and 1990s. This distinction reinforces the racialized deployment of the War on Drugs and is sustained by the lack of explicit discussion of race in the service of “color blind ideology.” We suggest potential correctives to these racially divergent patterns, in the form of socially responsible media practices and of clinical engagement with public policy.

    AB - The past decade in the U.S. has been marked by a media fascination with the white prescription opioid cum heroin user. In this paper, we contrast media coverage of white non-medical opioid users with that of black and brown heroin users to show how divergent representations lead to different public and policy responses. A content analysis of 100 popular press articles from 2001 and 2011 in which half describe heroin users and half describe prescription opioid users revealed a consistent contrast between criminalized urban black and Latino heroin injectors with sympathetic portrayals of suburban white prescription opioid users. Media coverage of the suburban and rural opioid “epidemic” of the 2000s helped draw a symbolic, and then legal, distinction between (urban) heroin addiction and (suburban and rural) prescription opioid addiction that is reminiscent of the legal distinction between crack cocaine and powder cocaine of the 1980s and 1990s. This distinction reinforces the racialized deployment of the War on Drugs and is sustained by the lack of explicit discussion of race in the service of “color blind ideology.” We suggest potential correctives to these racially divergent patterns, in the form of socially responsible media practices and of clinical engagement with public policy.

    KW - Addiction

    KW - Heroin

    KW - Media

    KW - Prescription opioids

    KW - Whiteness

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84996774843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84996774843&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s11013-016-9496-5

    DO - 10.1007/s11013-016-9496-5

    M3 - Article

    VL - 40

    SP - 664

    EP - 686

    JO - Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry

    JF - Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry

    SN - 0165-005X

    IS - 4

    ER -