### Abstract

The age structure of capital plays an important role in the measurement of productivity. It has been argued that the slowdown in the 1970s can be ascribed to the aging of the stock of capital. In this paper, we incorporate the age structure in productivity measurement. One proposition proves that Nelson's [Nelson, R.R., 1964. Aggregate production functions and medium-range growth projections. American Economic Review 54 (September), 575-605] formula is only an approximation. Our final proposition shows that inclusion of the vintage effect prompts an upward correction of measured productivity growth in times of an aging stock of capital. Here capital ages if the investment/capital ratio falls short of the inverse of the capital age, as a first proposition shows. The analysis rests on a rigorous accounting for vintages. We translate the Bureau of Economic Analysis' age of capital data into a measure of rates of obsolescence. Empirically, the correction of productivity growth for the vintage effect requires an estimate of the obsolescence and depreciation parameters on the basis of age data. The results indicate that the use of capital stock in efficiency units does cause some smoothing of total factor productivity growth over time. In the 1950s, when investment accelerated, the vintage-adjusted capital growth rate well exceeded the BEA growth rate, and vintage-adjusted TFP-growth is significantly lower than unadjusted TFP-growth. The measured productivity slowdown of the 1970s is somewhat ameliorated.

Original language | English (US) |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 306-328 |

Number of pages | 23 |

Journal | Structural Change and Economic Dynamics |

Volume | 17 |

Issue number | 3 |

DOIs | |

State | Published - Sep 2006 |

### Fingerprint

### Keywords

- Capital vintage
- Investment
- Productivity

### ASJC Scopus subject areas

- Economics and Econometrics

### Cite this

*Structural Change and Economic Dynamics*,

*17*(3), 306-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2005.05.002

**The vintage effect in TFP-growth : An analysis of the age structure of capital.** / Gittleman, Maury; ten Raa, Thijs; Wolff, Edward.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

*Structural Change and Economic Dynamics*, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 306-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2005.05.002

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The vintage effect in TFP-growth

T2 - An analysis of the age structure of capital

AU - Gittleman, Maury

AU - ten Raa, Thijs

AU - Wolff, Edward

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - The age structure of capital plays an important role in the measurement of productivity. It has been argued that the slowdown in the 1970s can be ascribed to the aging of the stock of capital. In this paper, we incorporate the age structure in productivity measurement. One proposition proves that Nelson's [Nelson, R.R., 1964. Aggregate production functions and medium-range growth projections. American Economic Review 54 (September), 575-605] formula is only an approximation. Our final proposition shows that inclusion of the vintage effect prompts an upward correction of measured productivity growth in times of an aging stock of capital. Here capital ages if the investment/capital ratio falls short of the inverse of the capital age, as a first proposition shows. The analysis rests on a rigorous accounting for vintages. We translate the Bureau of Economic Analysis' age of capital data into a measure of rates of obsolescence. Empirically, the correction of productivity growth for the vintage effect requires an estimate of the obsolescence and depreciation parameters on the basis of age data. The results indicate that the use of capital stock in efficiency units does cause some smoothing of total factor productivity growth over time. In the 1950s, when investment accelerated, the vintage-adjusted capital growth rate well exceeded the BEA growth rate, and vintage-adjusted TFP-growth is significantly lower than unadjusted TFP-growth. The measured productivity slowdown of the 1970s is somewhat ameliorated.

AB - The age structure of capital plays an important role in the measurement of productivity. It has been argued that the slowdown in the 1970s can be ascribed to the aging of the stock of capital. In this paper, we incorporate the age structure in productivity measurement. One proposition proves that Nelson's [Nelson, R.R., 1964. Aggregate production functions and medium-range growth projections. American Economic Review 54 (September), 575-605] formula is only an approximation. Our final proposition shows that inclusion of the vintage effect prompts an upward correction of measured productivity growth in times of an aging stock of capital. Here capital ages if the investment/capital ratio falls short of the inverse of the capital age, as a first proposition shows. The analysis rests on a rigorous accounting for vintages. We translate the Bureau of Economic Analysis' age of capital data into a measure of rates of obsolescence. Empirically, the correction of productivity growth for the vintage effect requires an estimate of the obsolescence and depreciation parameters on the basis of age data. The results indicate that the use of capital stock in efficiency units does cause some smoothing of total factor productivity growth over time. In the 1950s, when investment accelerated, the vintage-adjusted capital growth rate well exceeded the BEA growth rate, and vintage-adjusted TFP-growth is significantly lower than unadjusted TFP-growth. The measured productivity slowdown of the 1970s is somewhat ameliorated.

KW - Capital vintage

KW - Investment

KW - Productivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746134151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746134151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.strueco.2005.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.strueco.2005.05.002

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 306

EP - 328

JO - Structural Change and Economic Dynamics

JF - Structural Change and Economic Dynamics

SN - 0954-349X

IS - 3

ER -