The use and interpretation of logistic regression in higher education journals: 1988-1999

Chao Ying Joanne Peng, Tak Shing Harry So, Frances Stage, Edward P. St. John

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

This article examines the use and interpretation of logistic regression in three leading higher education research journals from 1988 to 1999. The journals were selected because of their emphasis on research, relevance to higher education issues, broad coverage of research topics, and reputable editorial policies. The term "logistic regression" encompasses logit modeling, probit modeling, and tobit modeling and the significance tests of their estimates. A total of 52 articles were identified as using logistic regression. Our review uncovered an increasingly sophisticated use of logistic regression for a wide range of topics. At the same time, there continues to be confusion over terminology. The sample sizes used did not always achieve a desired level of stability in the parameters estimated. Discussion of results in terms of delta-Ps and marginal probabilities was not always cautionary, according to definitions. The review is concluded with recommendations for journal editors and researchers in formulating appropriate editorial policies and practice for applying the versatile logistic regression technique and in communicating its results with readers of higher education research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)259-293
Number of pages35
JournalResearch in Higher Education
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

logistics
regression
interpretation
education
significance test
technical language
editor
coverage

Keywords

  • Delta-P
  • Higher education research
  • Logistic regression
  • Logit
  • Marginal probability
  • Multivariate statistics
  • Odds ratio
  • Probit
  • Tobit

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

The use and interpretation of logistic regression in higher education journals : 1988-1999. / Peng, Chao Ying Joanne; So, Tak Shing Harry; Stage, Frances; St. John, Edward P.

In: Research in Higher Education, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2002, p. 259-293.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Peng, Chao Ying Joanne ; So, Tak Shing Harry ; Stage, Frances ; St. John, Edward P. / The use and interpretation of logistic regression in higher education journals : 1988-1999. In: Research in Higher Education. 2002 ; Vol. 43, No. 3. pp. 259-293.
@article{3574bb7ab23a44c78b83abfa977bdb94,
title = "The use and interpretation of logistic regression in higher education journals: 1988-1999",
abstract = "This article examines the use and interpretation of logistic regression in three leading higher education research journals from 1988 to 1999. The journals were selected because of their emphasis on research, relevance to higher education issues, broad coverage of research topics, and reputable editorial policies. The term {"}logistic regression{"} encompasses logit modeling, probit modeling, and tobit modeling and the significance tests of their estimates. A total of 52 articles were identified as using logistic regression. Our review uncovered an increasingly sophisticated use of logistic regression for a wide range of topics. At the same time, there continues to be confusion over terminology. The sample sizes used did not always achieve a desired level of stability in the parameters estimated. Discussion of results in terms of delta-Ps and marginal probabilities was not always cautionary, according to definitions. The review is concluded with recommendations for journal editors and researchers in formulating appropriate editorial policies and practice for applying the versatile logistic regression technique and in communicating its results with readers of higher education research.",
keywords = "Delta-P, Higher education research, Logistic regression, Logit, Marginal probability, Multivariate statistics, Odds ratio, Probit, Tobit",
author = "Peng, {Chao Ying Joanne} and So, {Tak Shing Harry} and Frances Stage and {St. John}, {Edward P.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1023/A:1014858517172",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "259--293",
journal = "Research in Higher Education",
issn = "0361-0365",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use and interpretation of logistic regression in higher education journals

T2 - 1988-1999

AU - Peng, Chao Ying Joanne

AU - So, Tak Shing Harry

AU - Stage, Frances

AU - St. John, Edward P.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - This article examines the use and interpretation of logistic regression in three leading higher education research journals from 1988 to 1999. The journals were selected because of their emphasis on research, relevance to higher education issues, broad coverage of research topics, and reputable editorial policies. The term "logistic regression" encompasses logit modeling, probit modeling, and tobit modeling and the significance tests of their estimates. A total of 52 articles were identified as using logistic regression. Our review uncovered an increasingly sophisticated use of logistic regression for a wide range of topics. At the same time, there continues to be confusion over terminology. The sample sizes used did not always achieve a desired level of stability in the parameters estimated. Discussion of results in terms of delta-Ps and marginal probabilities was not always cautionary, according to definitions. The review is concluded with recommendations for journal editors and researchers in formulating appropriate editorial policies and practice for applying the versatile logistic regression technique and in communicating its results with readers of higher education research.

AB - This article examines the use and interpretation of logistic regression in three leading higher education research journals from 1988 to 1999. The journals were selected because of their emphasis on research, relevance to higher education issues, broad coverage of research topics, and reputable editorial policies. The term "logistic regression" encompasses logit modeling, probit modeling, and tobit modeling and the significance tests of their estimates. A total of 52 articles were identified as using logistic regression. Our review uncovered an increasingly sophisticated use of logistic regression for a wide range of topics. At the same time, there continues to be confusion over terminology. The sample sizes used did not always achieve a desired level of stability in the parameters estimated. Discussion of results in terms of delta-Ps and marginal probabilities was not always cautionary, according to definitions. The review is concluded with recommendations for journal editors and researchers in formulating appropriate editorial policies and practice for applying the versatile logistic regression technique and in communicating its results with readers of higher education research.

KW - Delta-P

KW - Higher education research

KW - Logistic regression

KW - Logit

KW - Marginal probability

KW - Multivariate statistics

KW - Odds ratio

KW - Probit

KW - Tobit

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0011032278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0011032278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1014858517172

DO - 10.1023/A:1014858517172

M3 - Review article

VL - 43

SP - 259

EP - 293

JO - Research in Higher Education

JF - Research in Higher Education

SN - 0361-0365

IS - 3

ER -