The typicalities of the english? walt rostow, the stages of economic growth, and modern british history

Guy Ortolano

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    Walt Rostow wanted his landmark contribution to modernization theory, The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-communist Manifesto (1960), to offer an alternative to Marxist analysis, and in service of that effort he sought to replace class with nation as the agent of history. Britain figured prominently in the resulting account, functioning as everything from a trailblazing pioneer to an idiosyncratic anomaly to a cautionary tale for weak-kneed Americans, but it never explicitly offered the model for other nations to follow that historians today associate with the text. In explaining how that misreading came to dominate discussions of Stages, this essay rethinks a US historiography that collapses modernization theory with American exceptionalism, and a UK historiography premised on the claim that Britain made the modern world. Attending to the function of Britain in Stages reinserts British history into postwar conceptions of world history - not as a paradigmatic case, but nevertheless as a significant one.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)657-684
    Number of pages28
    JournalModern Intellectual History
    Volume12
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 12 2015

    Fingerprint

    modernization theory
    historiography
    Communist Manifesto
    economic growth
    world history
    history
    historian
    Economic Growth
    British History
    Typicality
    Historiography
    Modernization Theory

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Cultural Studies
    • History
    • Philosophy
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    The typicalities of the english? walt rostow, the stages of economic growth, and modern british history. / Ortolano, Guy.

    In: Modern Intellectual History, Vol. 12, No. 3, 12.03.2015, p. 657-684.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    @article{7f27efee2c494d369e1679f012d8fd34,
    title = "The typicalities of the english? walt rostow, the stages of economic growth, and modern british history",
    abstract = "Walt Rostow wanted his landmark contribution to modernization theory, The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-communist Manifesto (1960), to offer an alternative to Marxist analysis, and in service of that effort he sought to replace class with nation as the agent of history. Britain figured prominently in the resulting account, functioning as everything from a trailblazing pioneer to an idiosyncratic anomaly to a cautionary tale for weak-kneed Americans, but it never explicitly offered the model for other nations to follow that historians today associate with the text. In explaining how that misreading came to dominate discussions of Stages, this essay rethinks a US historiography that collapses modernization theory with American exceptionalism, and a UK historiography premised on the claim that Britain made the modern world. Attending to the function of Britain in Stages reinserts British history into postwar conceptions of world history - not as a paradigmatic case, but nevertheless as a significant one.",
    author = "Guy Ortolano",
    year = "2015",
    month = "3",
    day = "12",
    doi = "10.1017/S1479244314000626",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "657--684",
    journal = "Modern Intellectual History",
    issn = "1479-2443",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The typicalities of the english? walt rostow, the stages of economic growth, and modern british history

    AU - Ortolano, Guy

    PY - 2015/3/12

    Y1 - 2015/3/12

    N2 - Walt Rostow wanted his landmark contribution to modernization theory, The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-communist Manifesto (1960), to offer an alternative to Marxist analysis, and in service of that effort he sought to replace class with nation as the agent of history. Britain figured prominently in the resulting account, functioning as everything from a trailblazing pioneer to an idiosyncratic anomaly to a cautionary tale for weak-kneed Americans, but it never explicitly offered the model for other nations to follow that historians today associate with the text. In explaining how that misreading came to dominate discussions of Stages, this essay rethinks a US historiography that collapses modernization theory with American exceptionalism, and a UK historiography premised on the claim that Britain made the modern world. Attending to the function of Britain in Stages reinserts British history into postwar conceptions of world history - not as a paradigmatic case, but nevertheless as a significant one.

    AB - Walt Rostow wanted his landmark contribution to modernization theory, The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-communist Manifesto (1960), to offer an alternative to Marxist analysis, and in service of that effort he sought to replace class with nation as the agent of history. Britain figured prominently in the resulting account, functioning as everything from a trailblazing pioneer to an idiosyncratic anomaly to a cautionary tale for weak-kneed Americans, but it never explicitly offered the model for other nations to follow that historians today associate with the text. In explaining how that misreading came to dominate discussions of Stages, this essay rethinks a US historiography that collapses modernization theory with American exceptionalism, and a UK historiography premised on the claim that Britain made the modern world. Attending to the function of Britain in Stages reinserts British history into postwar conceptions of world history - not as a paradigmatic case, but nevertheless as a significant one.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945475208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945475208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/S1479244314000626

    DO - 10.1017/S1479244314000626

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 12

    SP - 657

    EP - 684

    JO - Modern Intellectual History

    JF - Modern Intellectual History

    SN - 1479-2443

    IS - 3

    ER -