The Truth and Bias Model of Judgment

Tessa West, David A. Kenny

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We present a new model for the general study of how the truth and biases affect human judgment. In the truth and bias model, judgments about the world are pulled by 2 primary forces, the truth force and the bias force, and these 2 forces are interrelated. The truth and bias model differentiates force and value, where the force is the strength of the attraction and the value is the location toward which the judgment is attracted. The model also makes a formal theoretical distinction between bias and moderator variables. Two major classes of biases are discussed: biases that are measured with variables (e.g., assumed similarity) and directional bias, which refers to the extent to which judgments are pulled toward 1 end of the judgment continuum. Moderator variables are conceptualized as variables that affect the accuracy and bias forces but that do not affect judgments directly. We illustrate the model with 4 examples. We discuss the theoretical, empirical, methodological, measurement, and design implications of the model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)357-378
Number of pages22
JournalPsychological Review
Volume118
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Epidemiologic Effect Modifiers

Keywords

  • Accuracy
  • Bias
  • Perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

The Truth and Bias Model of Judgment. / West, Tessa; Kenny, David A.

In: Psychological Review, Vol. 118, No. 2, 04.2011, p. 357-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

West, Tessa ; Kenny, David A. / The Truth and Bias Model of Judgment. In: Psychological Review. 2011 ; Vol. 118, No. 2. pp. 357-378.
@article{dfc29007ba234ecc9e9b3930157471e8,
title = "The Truth and Bias Model of Judgment",
abstract = "We present a new model for the general study of how the truth and biases affect human judgment. In the truth and bias model, judgments about the world are pulled by 2 primary forces, the truth force and the bias force, and these 2 forces are interrelated. The truth and bias model differentiates force and value, where the force is the strength of the attraction and the value is the location toward which the judgment is attracted. The model also makes a formal theoretical distinction between bias and moderator variables. Two major classes of biases are discussed: biases that are measured with variables (e.g., assumed similarity) and directional bias, which refers to the extent to which judgments are pulled toward 1 end of the judgment continuum. Moderator variables are conceptualized as variables that affect the accuracy and bias forces but that do not affect judgments directly. We illustrate the model with 4 examples. We discuss the theoretical, empirical, methodological, measurement, and design implications of the model.",
keywords = "Accuracy, Bias, Perception",
author = "Tessa West and Kenny, {David A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1037/a0022936",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
pages = "357--378",
journal = "Psychological Review",
issn = "0033-295X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Truth and Bias Model of Judgment

AU - West, Tessa

AU - Kenny, David A.

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - We present a new model for the general study of how the truth and biases affect human judgment. In the truth and bias model, judgments about the world are pulled by 2 primary forces, the truth force and the bias force, and these 2 forces are interrelated. The truth and bias model differentiates force and value, where the force is the strength of the attraction and the value is the location toward which the judgment is attracted. The model also makes a formal theoretical distinction between bias and moderator variables. Two major classes of biases are discussed: biases that are measured with variables (e.g., assumed similarity) and directional bias, which refers to the extent to which judgments are pulled toward 1 end of the judgment continuum. Moderator variables are conceptualized as variables that affect the accuracy and bias forces but that do not affect judgments directly. We illustrate the model with 4 examples. We discuss the theoretical, empirical, methodological, measurement, and design implications of the model.

AB - We present a new model for the general study of how the truth and biases affect human judgment. In the truth and bias model, judgments about the world are pulled by 2 primary forces, the truth force and the bias force, and these 2 forces are interrelated. The truth and bias model differentiates force and value, where the force is the strength of the attraction and the value is the location toward which the judgment is attracted. The model also makes a formal theoretical distinction between bias and moderator variables. Two major classes of biases are discussed: biases that are measured with variables (e.g., assumed similarity) and directional bias, which refers to the extent to which judgments are pulled toward 1 end of the judgment continuum. Moderator variables are conceptualized as variables that affect the accuracy and bias forces but that do not affect judgments directly. We illustrate the model with 4 examples. We discuss the theoretical, empirical, methodological, measurement, and design implications of the model.

KW - Accuracy

KW - Bias

KW - Perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954988502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954988502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0022936

DO - 10.1037/a0022936

M3 - Article

C2 - 21480740

AN - SCOPUS:79954988502

VL - 118

SP - 357

EP - 378

JO - Psychological Review

JF - Psychological Review

SN - 0033-295X

IS - 2

ER -