The trade-off between accuracy and precision in latent variable models of mediation processes

Alison Ledgerwood, Patrick E. Shrout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Social psychologists place high importance on understanding mechanisms and frequently employ mediation analyses to shed light on the process underlying an effect. Such analyses can be conducted with observed variables (e.g., a typical regression approach) or latent variables (e.g., a structural equation modeling approach), and choosing between these methods can be a more complex and consequential decision than researchers often realize. The present article adds to the literature on mediation by examining the relative trade-off between accuracy and precision in latent versus observed variable modeling. Whereas past work has shown that latent variable models tend to produce more accurate estimates, we demonstrate that this increase in accuracy comes at the cost of increased standard errors and reduced power, and examine this relative trade-off both theoretically and empirically in a typical 3-variable mediation model across varying levels of effect size and reliability. We discuss implications for social psychologists seeking to uncover mediating variables and provide 3 practical recommendations for maximizing both accuracy and precision in mediation analyses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1174-1188
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume101
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

mediation
Psychology
psychologist
Research Personnel
regression
Power (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Latent variable
  • Mediation
  • Power
  • Regression
  • Structural equation modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

The trade-off between accuracy and precision in latent variable models of mediation processes. / Ledgerwood, Alison; Shrout, Patrick E.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 101, No. 6, 12.2011, p. 1174-1188.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a6d825e3cc3145c1ae1df3f3cf54135d,
title = "The trade-off between accuracy and precision in latent variable models of mediation processes",
abstract = "Social psychologists place high importance on understanding mechanisms and frequently employ mediation analyses to shed light on the process underlying an effect. Such analyses can be conducted with observed variables (e.g., a typical regression approach) or latent variables (e.g., a structural equation modeling approach), and choosing between these methods can be a more complex and consequential decision than researchers often realize. The present article adds to the literature on mediation by examining the relative trade-off between accuracy and precision in latent versus observed variable modeling. Whereas past work has shown that latent variable models tend to produce more accurate estimates, we demonstrate that this increase in accuracy comes at the cost of increased standard errors and reduced power, and examine this relative trade-off both theoretically and empirically in a typical 3-variable mediation model across varying levels of effect size and reliability. We discuss implications for social psychologists seeking to uncover mediating variables and provide 3 practical recommendations for maximizing both accuracy and precision in mediation analyses.",
keywords = "Latent variable, Mediation, Power, Regression, Structural equation modeling",
author = "Alison Ledgerwood and Shrout, {Patrick E.}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1037/a0024776",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "1174--1188",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The trade-off between accuracy and precision in latent variable models of mediation processes

AU - Ledgerwood, Alison

AU - Shrout, Patrick E.

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Social psychologists place high importance on understanding mechanisms and frequently employ mediation analyses to shed light on the process underlying an effect. Such analyses can be conducted with observed variables (e.g., a typical regression approach) or latent variables (e.g., a structural equation modeling approach), and choosing between these methods can be a more complex and consequential decision than researchers often realize. The present article adds to the literature on mediation by examining the relative trade-off between accuracy and precision in latent versus observed variable modeling. Whereas past work has shown that latent variable models tend to produce more accurate estimates, we demonstrate that this increase in accuracy comes at the cost of increased standard errors and reduced power, and examine this relative trade-off both theoretically and empirically in a typical 3-variable mediation model across varying levels of effect size and reliability. We discuss implications for social psychologists seeking to uncover mediating variables and provide 3 practical recommendations for maximizing both accuracy and precision in mediation analyses.

AB - Social psychologists place high importance on understanding mechanisms and frequently employ mediation analyses to shed light on the process underlying an effect. Such analyses can be conducted with observed variables (e.g., a typical regression approach) or latent variables (e.g., a structural equation modeling approach), and choosing between these methods can be a more complex and consequential decision than researchers often realize. The present article adds to the literature on mediation by examining the relative trade-off between accuracy and precision in latent versus observed variable modeling. Whereas past work has shown that latent variable models tend to produce more accurate estimates, we demonstrate that this increase in accuracy comes at the cost of increased standard errors and reduced power, and examine this relative trade-off both theoretically and empirically in a typical 3-variable mediation model across varying levels of effect size and reliability. We discuss implications for social psychologists seeking to uncover mediating variables and provide 3 practical recommendations for maximizing both accuracy and precision in mediation analyses.

KW - Latent variable

KW - Mediation

KW - Power

KW - Regression

KW - Structural equation modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82955165119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82955165119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0024776

DO - 10.1037/a0024776

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 1174

EP - 1188

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 6

ER -