The timing of response onset and offset in macaque visual neurons

Wyeth Bair, James R. Cavanaugh, Matthew A. Smith, J. Anthony Movshon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We used fast, pseudorandom temporal sequences of preferred and antipreferred stimuli to drive neuronal firing rates rapidly between minimal and maximal across the visual system. Stimuli were tailored to the preferences of cells recorded in the lateral geniculate nucleus (magnocellular and parvocellular), primary visual cortex (simple and complex), and the extrastriate motion area MT. We found that cells took longer to turn on (to increase their firing rate) than to turn off (to reduce their rate). The latency difference (onset minus offset) varied from several to tens of milliseconds across cell type and stimulus class and was correlated with spontaneous or driven firing rates for most cell classes. The delay for response onset depended on the nature of the stimulus present before the preferred stimulus appeared, and may result from persistent inhibition caused by antipreferred stimuli or from suppression that followed the offset of the preferred stimulus. The onset delay showed three distinct types of dependence on the temporal sequence of stimuli across classes of cells, implying that suppression may accumulate or wear off with time. Onset latency is generally longer, can be more variable, and has marked stimulus dependence compared with offset latency. This suggests an important role for offset latency in assessing the speed of information transmission in the visual system and raises the possibility that signal offsets provide a timing reference for visual processing. We discuss the origin of the delay in onset latency compared with offset latency and consider how it may limit the utility of certain feedforward circuits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3189-3205
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume22
Issue number8
StatePublished - Apr 15 2002

Fingerprint

Macaca
Neurons
Geniculate Bodies
Visual Cortex

Keywords

  • Area MT/V5
  • Inhibition
  • Integration time
  • Lateral geniculate nucleus
  • Macaque monkey
  • Primary visual cortex
  • Response latency
  • Spike timing
  • Spontaneous activity
  • Temporal dynamics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Bair, W., Cavanaugh, J. R., Smith, M. A., & Movshon, J. A. (2002). The timing of response onset and offset in macaque visual neurons. Journal of Neuroscience, 22(8), 3189-3205.

The timing of response onset and offset in macaque visual neurons. / Bair, Wyeth; Cavanaugh, James R.; Smith, Matthew A.; Movshon, J. Anthony.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 22, No. 8, 15.04.2002, p. 3189-3205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bair, W, Cavanaugh, JR, Smith, MA & Movshon, JA 2002, 'The timing of response onset and offset in macaque visual neurons', Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 3189-3205.
Bair, Wyeth ; Cavanaugh, James R. ; Smith, Matthew A. ; Movshon, J. Anthony. / The timing of response onset and offset in macaque visual neurons. In: Journal of Neuroscience. 2002 ; Vol. 22, No. 8. pp. 3189-3205.
@article{a7e966ef13204e2390c6062eadef430e,
title = "The timing of response onset and offset in macaque visual neurons",
abstract = "We used fast, pseudorandom temporal sequences of preferred and antipreferred stimuli to drive neuronal firing rates rapidly between minimal and maximal across the visual system. Stimuli were tailored to the preferences of cells recorded in the lateral geniculate nucleus (magnocellular and parvocellular), primary visual cortex (simple and complex), and the extrastriate motion area MT. We found that cells took longer to turn on (to increase their firing rate) than to turn off (to reduce their rate). The latency difference (onset minus offset) varied from several to tens of milliseconds across cell type and stimulus class and was correlated with spontaneous or driven firing rates for most cell classes. The delay for response onset depended on the nature of the stimulus present before the preferred stimulus appeared, and may result from persistent inhibition caused by antipreferred stimuli or from suppression that followed the offset of the preferred stimulus. The onset delay showed three distinct types of dependence on the temporal sequence of stimuli across classes of cells, implying that suppression may accumulate or wear off with time. Onset latency is generally longer, can be more variable, and has marked stimulus dependence compared with offset latency. This suggests an important role for offset latency in assessing the speed of information transmission in the visual system and raises the possibility that signal offsets provide a timing reference for visual processing. We discuss the origin of the delay in onset latency compared with offset latency and consider how it may limit the utility of certain feedforward circuits.",
keywords = "Area MT/V5, Inhibition, Integration time, Lateral geniculate nucleus, Macaque monkey, Primary visual cortex, Response latency, Spike timing, Spontaneous activity, Temporal dynamics",
author = "Wyeth Bair and Cavanaugh, {James R.} and Smith, {Matthew A.} and Movshon, {J. Anthony}",
year = "2002",
month = "4",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "3189--3205",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The timing of response onset and offset in macaque visual neurons

AU - Bair, Wyeth

AU - Cavanaugh, James R.

AU - Smith, Matthew A.

AU - Movshon, J. Anthony

PY - 2002/4/15

Y1 - 2002/4/15

N2 - We used fast, pseudorandom temporal sequences of preferred and antipreferred stimuli to drive neuronal firing rates rapidly between minimal and maximal across the visual system. Stimuli were tailored to the preferences of cells recorded in the lateral geniculate nucleus (magnocellular and parvocellular), primary visual cortex (simple and complex), and the extrastriate motion area MT. We found that cells took longer to turn on (to increase their firing rate) than to turn off (to reduce their rate). The latency difference (onset minus offset) varied from several to tens of milliseconds across cell type and stimulus class and was correlated with spontaneous or driven firing rates for most cell classes. The delay for response onset depended on the nature of the stimulus present before the preferred stimulus appeared, and may result from persistent inhibition caused by antipreferred stimuli or from suppression that followed the offset of the preferred stimulus. The onset delay showed three distinct types of dependence on the temporal sequence of stimuli across classes of cells, implying that suppression may accumulate or wear off with time. Onset latency is generally longer, can be more variable, and has marked stimulus dependence compared with offset latency. This suggests an important role for offset latency in assessing the speed of information transmission in the visual system and raises the possibility that signal offsets provide a timing reference for visual processing. We discuss the origin of the delay in onset latency compared with offset latency and consider how it may limit the utility of certain feedforward circuits.

AB - We used fast, pseudorandom temporal sequences of preferred and antipreferred stimuli to drive neuronal firing rates rapidly between minimal and maximal across the visual system. Stimuli were tailored to the preferences of cells recorded in the lateral geniculate nucleus (magnocellular and parvocellular), primary visual cortex (simple and complex), and the extrastriate motion area MT. We found that cells took longer to turn on (to increase their firing rate) than to turn off (to reduce their rate). The latency difference (onset minus offset) varied from several to tens of milliseconds across cell type and stimulus class and was correlated with spontaneous or driven firing rates for most cell classes. The delay for response onset depended on the nature of the stimulus present before the preferred stimulus appeared, and may result from persistent inhibition caused by antipreferred stimuli or from suppression that followed the offset of the preferred stimulus. The onset delay showed three distinct types of dependence on the temporal sequence of stimuli across classes of cells, implying that suppression may accumulate or wear off with time. Onset latency is generally longer, can be more variable, and has marked stimulus dependence compared with offset latency. This suggests an important role for offset latency in assessing the speed of information transmission in the visual system and raises the possibility that signal offsets provide a timing reference for visual processing. We discuss the origin of the delay in onset latency compared with offset latency and consider how it may limit the utility of certain feedforward circuits.

KW - Area MT/V5

KW - Inhibition

KW - Integration time

KW - Lateral geniculate nucleus

KW - Macaque monkey

KW - Primary visual cortex

KW - Response latency

KW - Spike timing

KW - Spontaneous activity

KW - Temporal dynamics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037092434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037092434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11943820

AN - SCOPUS:0037092434

VL - 22

SP - 3189

EP - 3205

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 8

ER -