The Teaching of Personalized Dentistry in North American Dental Schools: Changes from 2014 to 2017

Linda Y. Zheng, Barry R. Rifkin, Andrew Spielman, Lucille London, Steven D. London

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the development of personalized dentistry in the curricula of North American dental schools from 2014 to 2017. In 2014, a web-based survey on personalized medicine/dentistry (PM/PD) was distributed to academic deans of all U.S. (n=65) and Canadian (n=10) dental schools with graduating classes. The results (n=42; 56% response rate) showed that few schools had plans for implementation of PM/PD at the time, even though the majority of respondents reported feeling that PM/PD should be taught in the curriculum and will impact clinical practice in the future. A three-year followup survey in 2017, sent to the same 75 schools, was designed to reassess the teaching/practice of PM/PD in dental schools in both didactic and clinical curricula. In the results of the 2017 survey (n=30; 40% response rate), the majority of respondents reported feeling that PM/PD should be taught in dental curricula. However, while most respondents indicated their schools did not teach PM/PD as a portion of their didactic curricula, they reported that specific pertinent PM/PD topics were taught as part of other courses in their curricula. The 2017 survey also evaluated the use of seven genetics-based and eight non-genetics-based PM/PD diagnostics in the schools' clinical curricula. Overall, non-genetics-based diagnostics were used more often than genetics-based diagnostics, and the use of genetics-based diagnostics was more prevalent in postgraduate than predoctoral clinics. Personalized dentistry will inevitably be part of the dental professional's future and should be reflected in basic science research, clinical settings, and dental school curricula in both predoctoral and postgraduate programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1065-1075
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of dental education
Volume83
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Dental Schools
dentistry
Dentistry
Curriculum
Teaching
curriculum
school
diagnostic
didactics
Tooth
Emotions
Precision Medicine
Surveys and Questionnaires
teaching practice
medicine
science

Keywords

  • curriculum
  • dental education
  • evidence-based dentistry
  • personalized dentistry
  • personalized medicine
  • precision medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

The Teaching of Personalized Dentistry in North American Dental Schools : Changes from 2014 to 2017. / Zheng, Linda Y.; Rifkin, Barry R.; Spielman, Andrew; London, Lucille; London, Steven D.

In: Journal of dental education, Vol. 83, No. 9, 01.09.2019, p. 1065-1075.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zheng, Linda Y. ; Rifkin, Barry R. ; Spielman, Andrew ; London, Lucille ; London, Steven D. / The Teaching of Personalized Dentistry in North American Dental Schools : Changes from 2014 to 2017. In: Journal of dental education. 2019 ; Vol. 83, No. 9. pp. 1065-1075.
@article{bde9f1d6e02c4a36a151769db0546ef2,
title = "The Teaching of Personalized Dentistry in North American Dental Schools: Changes from 2014 to 2017",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to assess the development of personalized dentistry in the curricula of North American dental schools from 2014 to 2017. In 2014, a web-based survey on personalized medicine/dentistry (PM/PD) was distributed to academic deans of all U.S. (n=65) and Canadian (n=10) dental schools with graduating classes. The results (n=42; 56{\%} response rate) showed that few schools had plans for implementation of PM/PD at the time, even though the majority of respondents reported feeling that PM/PD should be taught in the curriculum and will impact clinical practice in the future. A three-year followup survey in 2017, sent to the same 75 schools, was designed to reassess the teaching/practice of PM/PD in dental schools in both didactic and clinical curricula. In the results of the 2017 survey (n=30; 40{\%} response rate), the majority of respondents reported feeling that PM/PD should be taught in dental curricula. However, while most respondents indicated their schools did not teach PM/PD as a portion of their didactic curricula, they reported that specific pertinent PM/PD topics were taught as part of other courses in their curricula. The 2017 survey also evaluated the use of seven genetics-based and eight non-genetics-based PM/PD diagnostics in the schools' clinical curricula. Overall, non-genetics-based diagnostics were used more often than genetics-based diagnostics, and the use of genetics-based diagnostics was more prevalent in postgraduate than predoctoral clinics. Personalized dentistry will inevitably be part of the dental professional's future and should be reflected in basic science research, clinical settings, and dental school curricula in both predoctoral and postgraduate programs.",
keywords = "curriculum, dental education, evidence-based dentistry, personalized dentistry, personalized medicine, precision medicine",
author = "Zheng, {Linda Y.} and Rifkin, {Barry R.} and Andrew Spielman and Lucille London and London, {Steven D.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.21815/JDE.019.108",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "1065--1075",
journal = "Journal of Dental Education",
issn = "0022-0337",
publisher = "American Dental Education Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Teaching of Personalized Dentistry in North American Dental Schools

T2 - Changes from 2014 to 2017

AU - Zheng, Linda Y.

AU - Rifkin, Barry R.

AU - Spielman, Andrew

AU - London, Lucille

AU - London, Steven D.

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to assess the development of personalized dentistry in the curricula of North American dental schools from 2014 to 2017. In 2014, a web-based survey on personalized medicine/dentistry (PM/PD) was distributed to academic deans of all U.S. (n=65) and Canadian (n=10) dental schools with graduating classes. The results (n=42; 56% response rate) showed that few schools had plans for implementation of PM/PD at the time, even though the majority of respondents reported feeling that PM/PD should be taught in the curriculum and will impact clinical practice in the future. A three-year followup survey in 2017, sent to the same 75 schools, was designed to reassess the teaching/practice of PM/PD in dental schools in both didactic and clinical curricula. In the results of the 2017 survey (n=30; 40% response rate), the majority of respondents reported feeling that PM/PD should be taught in dental curricula. However, while most respondents indicated their schools did not teach PM/PD as a portion of their didactic curricula, they reported that specific pertinent PM/PD topics were taught as part of other courses in their curricula. The 2017 survey also evaluated the use of seven genetics-based and eight non-genetics-based PM/PD diagnostics in the schools' clinical curricula. Overall, non-genetics-based diagnostics were used more often than genetics-based diagnostics, and the use of genetics-based diagnostics was more prevalent in postgraduate than predoctoral clinics. Personalized dentistry will inevitably be part of the dental professional's future and should be reflected in basic science research, clinical settings, and dental school curricula in both predoctoral and postgraduate programs.

AB - The aim of this study was to assess the development of personalized dentistry in the curricula of North American dental schools from 2014 to 2017. In 2014, a web-based survey on personalized medicine/dentistry (PM/PD) was distributed to academic deans of all U.S. (n=65) and Canadian (n=10) dental schools with graduating classes. The results (n=42; 56% response rate) showed that few schools had plans for implementation of PM/PD at the time, even though the majority of respondents reported feeling that PM/PD should be taught in the curriculum and will impact clinical practice in the future. A three-year followup survey in 2017, sent to the same 75 schools, was designed to reassess the teaching/practice of PM/PD in dental schools in both didactic and clinical curricula. In the results of the 2017 survey (n=30; 40% response rate), the majority of respondents reported feeling that PM/PD should be taught in dental curricula. However, while most respondents indicated their schools did not teach PM/PD as a portion of their didactic curricula, they reported that specific pertinent PM/PD topics were taught as part of other courses in their curricula. The 2017 survey also evaluated the use of seven genetics-based and eight non-genetics-based PM/PD diagnostics in the schools' clinical curricula. Overall, non-genetics-based diagnostics were used more often than genetics-based diagnostics, and the use of genetics-based diagnostics was more prevalent in postgraduate than predoctoral clinics. Personalized dentistry will inevitably be part of the dental professional's future and should be reflected in basic science research, clinical settings, and dental school curricula in both predoctoral and postgraduate programs.

KW - curriculum

KW - dental education

KW - evidence-based dentistry

KW - personalized dentistry

KW - personalized medicine

KW - precision medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071785471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071785471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.21815/JDE.019.108

DO - 10.21815/JDE.019.108

M3 - Article

C2 - 31182624

AN - SCOPUS:85071785471

VL - 83

SP - 1065

EP - 1075

JO - Journal of Dental Education

JF - Journal of Dental Education

SN - 0022-0337

IS - 9

ER -