The taxonomic status and biochronological implications of new finds of Oreopithecus from Baccinello (Tuscany, Italy)

L. Rook, Terry Harrison, B. Engesser

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Several species of mammals endemic to the late Miocene faunas of the Maremma region of Tuscany in Italy are known to have undergone a significant degree of morphological change during the time interval between the deposition of V-1 and V-2 horizons at Baccinello. This raises the interesting question of whether or not Oreopithecus, which occurs in association with both V-1 and V-2 faunas, exhibits corresponding morphological change or taxonomic differentiation through time. Detailed comparisons of the Oreopithecus sample from Baccinello V-1 (and from the biostratigraphically equivalent sites of Ribolla, Casteani and Montemassi) with the type material of O. bambolii from the site of Monte Bamboli, tentatively correlated with Baccinello V-2, indicate that there are no morphological or metrical differences by which to distinguish them. The recovery of a small sample of Oreopithecus specimens from the Trasubbie River valley near Baccinello, derived from horizons stratigraphically above those yielding a V-1 fauna, allows, for the first time, direct comparisons of material from different strata within a single depositional basin. The material consists of a newly discovered partial mandible (IGF 4883V) from the F1 horizon, and four isolated teeth, a malar fragment, and a patella from the V-2 horizon. IGF 4883V is very similar to Oreopithecus specimens from Baccinello V-1, although it differs in having a more molariform P3 and relatively larger cheek teeth. However, given the extent of variation in Oreopithecus, and the fact that the mandible almost certainly belonged to a male individual, these minor differences do not seem to be significant, and are best interpreted as being due to intraspecific variation. This conclusion is further supported by comparisons with Baccinello V-2 specimens, which appear to be indistinguishable from the large sample of specimens from Baccinello V-I. Although the sample of Oreopithecus specimens from horizons located above V-1 remains small, there is sufficient material to conclude that there is no evidence of morphological change or taxonomic differentiation in Oreopithecus during the time interval of about 2 Ma between Baccinello V-1 and V-2.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)3-27
    Number of pages25
    JournalJournal of Human Evolution
    Volume30
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1996

    Fingerprint

    Italy
    fauna
    tooth
    teeth
    sampling
    intraspecific variation
    social stratum
    mammal
    valleys
    river
    Miocene
    mammals
    basins
    valley
    rivers
    material
    Tuscany
    basin
    evidence
    comparison

    Keywords

    • Baccinello
    • Dentition
    • Fauna
    • Late Miocene
    • Mandible
    • Maremma
    • Oreopithecus bambolii
    • Stratigraphy

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
    • Education
    • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

    Cite this

    The taxonomic status and biochronological implications of new finds of Oreopithecus from Baccinello (Tuscany, Italy). / Rook, L.; Harrison, Terry; Engesser, B.

    In: Journal of Human Evolution, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1996, p. 3-27.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{3ac440ca21f444eabacdfe180935b806,
    title = "The taxonomic status and biochronological implications of new finds of Oreopithecus from Baccinello (Tuscany, Italy)",
    abstract = "Several species of mammals endemic to the late Miocene faunas of the Maremma region of Tuscany in Italy are known to have undergone a significant degree of morphological change during the time interval between the deposition of V-1 and V-2 horizons at Baccinello. This raises the interesting question of whether or not Oreopithecus, which occurs in association with both V-1 and V-2 faunas, exhibits corresponding morphological change or taxonomic differentiation through time. Detailed comparisons of the Oreopithecus sample from Baccinello V-1 (and from the biostratigraphically equivalent sites of Ribolla, Casteani and Montemassi) with the type material of O. bambolii from the site of Monte Bamboli, tentatively correlated with Baccinello V-2, indicate that there are no morphological or metrical differences by which to distinguish them. The recovery of a small sample of Oreopithecus specimens from the Trasubbie River valley near Baccinello, derived from horizons stratigraphically above those yielding a V-1 fauna, allows, for the first time, direct comparisons of material from different strata within a single depositional basin. The material consists of a newly discovered partial mandible (IGF 4883V) from the F1 horizon, and four isolated teeth, a malar fragment, and a patella from the V-2 horizon. IGF 4883V is very similar to Oreopithecus specimens from Baccinello V-1, although it differs in having a more molariform P3 and relatively larger cheek teeth. However, given the extent of variation in Oreopithecus, and the fact that the mandible almost certainly belonged to a male individual, these minor differences do not seem to be significant, and are best interpreted as being due to intraspecific variation. This conclusion is further supported by comparisons with Baccinello V-2 specimens, which appear to be indistinguishable from the large sample of specimens from Baccinello V-I. Although the sample of Oreopithecus specimens from horizons located above V-1 remains small, there is sufficient material to conclude that there is no evidence of morphological change or taxonomic differentiation in Oreopithecus during the time interval of about 2 Ma between Baccinello V-1 and V-2.",
    keywords = "Baccinello, Dentition, Fauna, Late Miocene, Mandible, Maremma, Oreopithecus bambolii, Stratigraphy",
    author = "L. Rook and Terry Harrison and B. Engesser",
    year = "1996",
    doi = "10.1006/jhev.1996.0002",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "30",
    pages = "3--27",
    journal = "Journal of Human Evolution",
    issn = "0047-2484",
    publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The taxonomic status and biochronological implications of new finds of Oreopithecus from Baccinello (Tuscany, Italy)

    AU - Rook, L.

    AU - Harrison, Terry

    AU - Engesser, B.

    PY - 1996

    Y1 - 1996

    N2 - Several species of mammals endemic to the late Miocene faunas of the Maremma region of Tuscany in Italy are known to have undergone a significant degree of morphological change during the time interval between the deposition of V-1 and V-2 horizons at Baccinello. This raises the interesting question of whether or not Oreopithecus, which occurs in association with both V-1 and V-2 faunas, exhibits corresponding morphological change or taxonomic differentiation through time. Detailed comparisons of the Oreopithecus sample from Baccinello V-1 (and from the biostratigraphically equivalent sites of Ribolla, Casteani and Montemassi) with the type material of O. bambolii from the site of Monte Bamboli, tentatively correlated with Baccinello V-2, indicate that there are no morphological or metrical differences by which to distinguish them. The recovery of a small sample of Oreopithecus specimens from the Trasubbie River valley near Baccinello, derived from horizons stratigraphically above those yielding a V-1 fauna, allows, for the first time, direct comparisons of material from different strata within a single depositional basin. The material consists of a newly discovered partial mandible (IGF 4883V) from the F1 horizon, and four isolated teeth, a malar fragment, and a patella from the V-2 horizon. IGF 4883V is very similar to Oreopithecus specimens from Baccinello V-1, although it differs in having a more molariform P3 and relatively larger cheek teeth. However, given the extent of variation in Oreopithecus, and the fact that the mandible almost certainly belonged to a male individual, these minor differences do not seem to be significant, and are best interpreted as being due to intraspecific variation. This conclusion is further supported by comparisons with Baccinello V-2 specimens, which appear to be indistinguishable from the large sample of specimens from Baccinello V-I. Although the sample of Oreopithecus specimens from horizons located above V-1 remains small, there is sufficient material to conclude that there is no evidence of morphological change or taxonomic differentiation in Oreopithecus during the time interval of about 2 Ma between Baccinello V-1 and V-2.

    AB - Several species of mammals endemic to the late Miocene faunas of the Maremma region of Tuscany in Italy are known to have undergone a significant degree of morphological change during the time interval between the deposition of V-1 and V-2 horizons at Baccinello. This raises the interesting question of whether or not Oreopithecus, which occurs in association with both V-1 and V-2 faunas, exhibits corresponding morphological change or taxonomic differentiation through time. Detailed comparisons of the Oreopithecus sample from Baccinello V-1 (and from the biostratigraphically equivalent sites of Ribolla, Casteani and Montemassi) with the type material of O. bambolii from the site of Monte Bamboli, tentatively correlated with Baccinello V-2, indicate that there are no morphological or metrical differences by which to distinguish them. The recovery of a small sample of Oreopithecus specimens from the Trasubbie River valley near Baccinello, derived from horizons stratigraphically above those yielding a V-1 fauna, allows, for the first time, direct comparisons of material from different strata within a single depositional basin. The material consists of a newly discovered partial mandible (IGF 4883V) from the F1 horizon, and four isolated teeth, a malar fragment, and a patella from the V-2 horizon. IGF 4883V is very similar to Oreopithecus specimens from Baccinello V-1, although it differs in having a more molariform P3 and relatively larger cheek teeth. However, given the extent of variation in Oreopithecus, and the fact that the mandible almost certainly belonged to a male individual, these minor differences do not seem to be significant, and are best interpreted as being due to intraspecific variation. This conclusion is further supported by comparisons with Baccinello V-2 specimens, which appear to be indistinguishable from the large sample of specimens from Baccinello V-I. Although the sample of Oreopithecus specimens from horizons located above V-1 remains small, there is sufficient material to conclude that there is no evidence of morphological change or taxonomic differentiation in Oreopithecus during the time interval of about 2 Ma between Baccinello V-1 and V-2.

    KW - Baccinello

    KW - Dentition

    KW - Fauna

    KW - Late Miocene

    KW - Mandible

    KW - Maremma

    KW - Oreopithecus bambolii

    KW - Stratigraphy

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029768382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029768382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1006/jhev.1996.0002

    DO - 10.1006/jhev.1996.0002

    M3 - Article

    VL - 30

    SP - 3

    EP - 27

    JO - Journal of Human Evolution

    JF - Journal of Human Evolution

    SN - 0047-2484

    IS - 1

    ER -