The taxonomic and phylogenetic affinities of bunopithecus sericus, a fossil hylobatid from the pleistocene of China

Alejandra Ortiz, Varsha Pilbrow, Catalina I. Villamil, Jessica G. Korsgaard, Shara Bailey, Terry Harrison

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Fossil hylobatids are rare, but are known from late Miocene and Pleistocene sites throughout East Asia. The best-known fossil hylobatid from the Pleistocene of China is a left mandibular fragment with M2-3 (AMNH 18534), recovered from a pit deposit near the village of Yanjinggou in Wanzhou District, Chongqing Province. Matthew and Granger described this specimen in 1923 as a new genus and species, Bunopithecus sericus. Establishing the age of Bunopithecus has proved difficult because the Yanjinggou collection represents a mixed fauna of different ages, but it likely comes from early or middle Pleistocene deposits. Although the Bunopithecus specimen has featured prominently in discussions of hylobatid evolution and nomenclature, its systematic status has never been satisfactorily resolved. The present study reexamines the taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships of Bunopithecus by carrying out a detailed comparative morphometric study of its lower molars in relation to a large sample of modern hylobatids. Our results show that differences in M2 and M3 discriminate extant hylobatids fairly well, at least at the generic level, and that AMNH 18534 is not attributable to Hylobates, Nomascus or Symphalangus. Support for a close relationship between Bunopithecus and Hoolock is more equivocal. In most multivariate analyses, Bunopithecus presents a unique morphological pattern that falls outside the range of variation of any hylobatid taxon, although its distance from the cluster represented by extant hoolocks is relatively small. Our results support the generic distinction of Bunopithecus, which most likely represents an extinct crown hylobatid, and one that may possibly represent the sister taxon to Hoolock.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Article number131206
    JournalPLoS One
    Volume10
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 8 2015

    Fingerprint

    Hylobates
    China
    Deposits
    fossils
    phylogeny
    Terminology
    East Asia
    villages
    new genus
    Far East
    fauna
    Crowns
    new species
    Multivariate Analysis
    sampling
    alpha-amino-2-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolyl)methyl-5-methyl-3-oxo-4-isoxazoline-4-propionic acid

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Medicine(all)
    • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
    • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Ortiz, A., Pilbrow, V., Villamil, C. I., Korsgaard, J. G., Bailey, S., & Harrison, T. (2015). The taxonomic and phylogenetic affinities of bunopithecus sericus, a fossil hylobatid from the pleistocene of China. PLoS One, 10(7), [131206]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0131206

    The taxonomic and phylogenetic affinities of bunopithecus sericus, a fossil hylobatid from the pleistocene of China. / Ortiz, Alejandra; Pilbrow, Varsha; Villamil, Catalina I.; Korsgaard, Jessica G.; Bailey, Shara; Harrison, Terry.

    In: PLoS One, Vol. 10, No. 7, 131206, 08.07.2015.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Ortiz, Alejandra ; Pilbrow, Varsha ; Villamil, Catalina I. ; Korsgaard, Jessica G. ; Bailey, Shara ; Harrison, Terry. / The taxonomic and phylogenetic affinities of bunopithecus sericus, a fossil hylobatid from the pleistocene of China. In: PLoS One. 2015 ; Vol. 10, No. 7.
    @article{7fd8f2803bb74c9994540f9cad28435d,
    title = "The taxonomic and phylogenetic affinities of bunopithecus sericus, a fossil hylobatid from the pleistocene of China",
    abstract = "Fossil hylobatids are rare, but are known from late Miocene and Pleistocene sites throughout East Asia. The best-known fossil hylobatid from the Pleistocene of China is a left mandibular fragment with M2-3 (AMNH 18534), recovered from a pit deposit near the village of Yanjinggou in Wanzhou District, Chongqing Province. Matthew and Granger described this specimen in 1923 as a new genus and species, Bunopithecus sericus. Establishing the age of Bunopithecus has proved difficult because the Yanjinggou collection represents a mixed fauna of different ages, but it likely comes from early or middle Pleistocene deposits. Although the Bunopithecus specimen has featured prominently in discussions of hylobatid evolution and nomenclature, its systematic status has never been satisfactorily resolved. The present study reexamines the taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships of Bunopithecus by carrying out a detailed comparative morphometric study of its lower molars in relation to a large sample of modern hylobatids. Our results show that differences in M2 and M3 discriminate extant hylobatids fairly well, at least at the generic level, and that AMNH 18534 is not attributable to Hylobates, Nomascus or Symphalangus. Support for a close relationship between Bunopithecus and Hoolock is more equivocal. In most multivariate analyses, Bunopithecus presents a unique morphological pattern that falls outside the range of variation of any hylobatid taxon, although its distance from the cluster represented by extant hoolocks is relatively small. Our results support the generic distinction of Bunopithecus, which most likely represents an extinct crown hylobatid, and one that may possibly represent the sister taxon to Hoolock.",
    author = "Alejandra Ortiz and Varsha Pilbrow and Villamil, {Catalina I.} and Korsgaard, {Jessica G.} and Shara Bailey and Terry Harrison",
    year = "2015",
    month = "7",
    day = "8",
    doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0131206",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "10",
    journal = "PLoS One",
    issn = "1932-6203",
    publisher = "Public Library of Science",
    number = "7",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The taxonomic and phylogenetic affinities of bunopithecus sericus, a fossil hylobatid from the pleistocene of China

    AU - Ortiz, Alejandra

    AU - Pilbrow, Varsha

    AU - Villamil, Catalina I.

    AU - Korsgaard, Jessica G.

    AU - Bailey, Shara

    AU - Harrison, Terry

    PY - 2015/7/8

    Y1 - 2015/7/8

    N2 - Fossil hylobatids are rare, but are known from late Miocene and Pleistocene sites throughout East Asia. The best-known fossil hylobatid from the Pleistocene of China is a left mandibular fragment with M2-3 (AMNH 18534), recovered from a pit deposit near the village of Yanjinggou in Wanzhou District, Chongqing Province. Matthew and Granger described this specimen in 1923 as a new genus and species, Bunopithecus sericus. Establishing the age of Bunopithecus has proved difficult because the Yanjinggou collection represents a mixed fauna of different ages, but it likely comes from early or middle Pleistocene deposits. Although the Bunopithecus specimen has featured prominently in discussions of hylobatid evolution and nomenclature, its systematic status has never been satisfactorily resolved. The present study reexamines the taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships of Bunopithecus by carrying out a detailed comparative morphometric study of its lower molars in relation to a large sample of modern hylobatids. Our results show that differences in M2 and M3 discriminate extant hylobatids fairly well, at least at the generic level, and that AMNH 18534 is not attributable to Hylobates, Nomascus or Symphalangus. Support for a close relationship between Bunopithecus and Hoolock is more equivocal. In most multivariate analyses, Bunopithecus presents a unique morphological pattern that falls outside the range of variation of any hylobatid taxon, although its distance from the cluster represented by extant hoolocks is relatively small. Our results support the generic distinction of Bunopithecus, which most likely represents an extinct crown hylobatid, and one that may possibly represent the sister taxon to Hoolock.

    AB - Fossil hylobatids are rare, but are known from late Miocene and Pleistocene sites throughout East Asia. The best-known fossil hylobatid from the Pleistocene of China is a left mandibular fragment with M2-3 (AMNH 18534), recovered from a pit deposit near the village of Yanjinggou in Wanzhou District, Chongqing Province. Matthew and Granger described this specimen in 1923 as a new genus and species, Bunopithecus sericus. Establishing the age of Bunopithecus has proved difficult because the Yanjinggou collection represents a mixed fauna of different ages, but it likely comes from early or middle Pleistocene deposits. Although the Bunopithecus specimen has featured prominently in discussions of hylobatid evolution and nomenclature, its systematic status has never been satisfactorily resolved. The present study reexamines the taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships of Bunopithecus by carrying out a detailed comparative morphometric study of its lower molars in relation to a large sample of modern hylobatids. Our results show that differences in M2 and M3 discriminate extant hylobatids fairly well, at least at the generic level, and that AMNH 18534 is not attributable to Hylobates, Nomascus or Symphalangus. Support for a close relationship between Bunopithecus and Hoolock is more equivocal. In most multivariate analyses, Bunopithecus presents a unique morphological pattern that falls outside the range of variation of any hylobatid taxon, although its distance from the cluster represented by extant hoolocks is relatively small. Our results support the generic distinction of Bunopithecus, which most likely represents an extinct crown hylobatid, and one that may possibly represent the sister taxon to Hoolock.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941332231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941332231&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0131206

    DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0131206

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 26154175

    AN - SCOPUS:84941332231

    VL - 10

    JO - PLoS One

    JF - PLoS One

    SN - 1932-6203

    IS - 7

    M1 - 131206

    ER -