The structure of class conflict in democratic capitalist societies

Adam Przeworski, Michael Wallerstein

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    The combination of private ownership of the instruments of production with representative political institutions based on widespread suffrage constitutes a compromise between workers, who consent to the private appropriation of profit by owners of capital, and capitalists, who accept the democratic institutions through which workers can make effective claims for an improvement of their material conditions. This form of societal organization was considered to be inherently unstable by Marx, who believed that capitalist democracy is “only the political form of revolution of bourgeois society and not its conservative form of life,” (1934, p. 18) “only a spasmodic, exceptional state of things … impossible as the normal form of society.” (1972, p. 198) Once introduced, Marx thought, political democracy would either be extended to the “social realm” by workers nationalizing the means of production or subverted by capitalists using the ownership of capital to restore their political power. Yet in many countries, capitalist democracy has persisted over long periods of time. Marx's predictions may have been false for at least two distinct reasons. His followers have tended to accept a model of conflict in which interests of classes are irreconcilably opposed to each other, a model that implies that workers should always be hostile to capitalism and capitalists. If this model is correct and if capitalism nevertheless survives in its democratic form, it must be the result of the activities of some institutions, typically thought to be the state, which provide physical repression, ideological domination, cooptation of workers' leaders, or whatever else is necessary to perpetuate capitalism in the face of the permanent threat posed by workers.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationSelected Works of Michael Wallerstein: The Political Economy of Inequality, Unions, and Social Democracy
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    Pages18-57
    Number of pages40
    ISBN (Electronic)9780511619793
    ISBN (Print)9780521886888
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

    Fingerprint

    class antagonism
    capitalist society
    worker
    democracy
    bourgeois society
    means of production
    suffrage
    repression
    follower
    political institution
    political power
    domination
    compromise
    profit
    threat
    leader
    organization

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Przeworski, A., & Wallerstein, M. (2008). The structure of class conflict in democratic capitalist societies. In Selected Works of Michael Wallerstein: The Political Economy of Inequality, Unions, and Social Democracy (pp. 18-57). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619793.004

    The structure of class conflict in democratic capitalist societies. / Przeworski, Adam; Wallerstein, Michael.

    Selected Works of Michael Wallerstein: The Political Economy of Inequality, Unions, and Social Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2008. p. 18-57.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Przeworski, A & Wallerstein, M 2008, The structure of class conflict in democratic capitalist societies. in Selected Works of Michael Wallerstein: The Political Economy of Inequality, Unions, and Social Democracy. Cambridge University Press, pp. 18-57. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619793.004
    Przeworski A, Wallerstein M. The structure of class conflict in democratic capitalist societies. In Selected Works of Michael Wallerstein: The Political Economy of Inequality, Unions, and Social Democracy. Cambridge University Press. 2008. p. 18-57 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619793.004
    Przeworski, Adam ; Wallerstein, Michael. / The structure of class conflict in democratic capitalist societies. Selected Works of Michael Wallerstein: The Political Economy of Inequality, Unions, and Social Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2008. pp. 18-57
    @inbook{16745e188992426a90348e5a2d7d5998,
    title = "The structure of class conflict in democratic capitalist societies",
    abstract = "The combination of private ownership of the instruments of production with representative political institutions based on widespread suffrage constitutes a compromise between workers, who consent to the private appropriation of profit by owners of capital, and capitalists, who accept the democratic institutions through which workers can make effective claims for an improvement of their material conditions. This form of societal organization was considered to be inherently unstable by Marx, who believed that capitalist democracy is “only the political form of revolution of bourgeois society and not its conservative form of life,” (1934, p. 18) “only a spasmodic, exceptional state of things … impossible as the normal form of society.” (1972, p. 198) Once introduced, Marx thought, political democracy would either be extended to the “social realm” by workers nationalizing the means of production or subverted by capitalists using the ownership of capital to restore their political power. Yet in many countries, capitalist democracy has persisted over long periods of time. Marx's predictions may have been false for at least two distinct reasons. His followers have tended to accept a model of conflict in which interests of classes are irreconcilably opposed to each other, a model that implies that workers should always be hostile to capitalism and capitalists. If this model is correct and if capitalism nevertheless survives in its democratic form, it must be the result of the activities of some institutions, typically thought to be the state, which provide physical repression, ideological domination, cooptation of workers' leaders, or whatever else is necessary to perpetuate capitalism in the face of the permanent threat posed by workers.",
    author = "Adam Przeworski and Michael Wallerstein",
    year = "2008",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511619793.004",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "9780521886888",
    pages = "18--57",
    booktitle = "Selected Works of Michael Wallerstein: The Political Economy of Inequality, Unions, and Social Democracy",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    address = "United Kingdom",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - The structure of class conflict in democratic capitalist societies

    AU - Przeworski, Adam

    AU - Wallerstein, Michael

    PY - 2008/1/1

    Y1 - 2008/1/1

    N2 - The combination of private ownership of the instruments of production with representative political institutions based on widespread suffrage constitutes a compromise between workers, who consent to the private appropriation of profit by owners of capital, and capitalists, who accept the democratic institutions through which workers can make effective claims for an improvement of their material conditions. This form of societal organization was considered to be inherently unstable by Marx, who believed that capitalist democracy is “only the political form of revolution of bourgeois society and not its conservative form of life,” (1934, p. 18) “only a spasmodic, exceptional state of things … impossible as the normal form of society.” (1972, p. 198) Once introduced, Marx thought, political democracy would either be extended to the “social realm” by workers nationalizing the means of production or subverted by capitalists using the ownership of capital to restore their political power. Yet in many countries, capitalist democracy has persisted over long periods of time. Marx's predictions may have been false for at least two distinct reasons. His followers have tended to accept a model of conflict in which interests of classes are irreconcilably opposed to each other, a model that implies that workers should always be hostile to capitalism and capitalists. If this model is correct and if capitalism nevertheless survives in its democratic form, it must be the result of the activities of some institutions, typically thought to be the state, which provide physical repression, ideological domination, cooptation of workers' leaders, or whatever else is necessary to perpetuate capitalism in the face of the permanent threat posed by workers.

    AB - The combination of private ownership of the instruments of production with representative political institutions based on widespread suffrage constitutes a compromise between workers, who consent to the private appropriation of profit by owners of capital, and capitalists, who accept the democratic institutions through which workers can make effective claims for an improvement of their material conditions. This form of societal organization was considered to be inherently unstable by Marx, who believed that capitalist democracy is “only the political form of revolution of bourgeois society and not its conservative form of life,” (1934, p. 18) “only a spasmodic, exceptional state of things … impossible as the normal form of society.” (1972, p. 198) Once introduced, Marx thought, political democracy would either be extended to the “social realm” by workers nationalizing the means of production or subverted by capitalists using the ownership of capital to restore their political power. Yet in many countries, capitalist democracy has persisted over long periods of time. Marx's predictions may have been false for at least two distinct reasons. His followers have tended to accept a model of conflict in which interests of classes are irreconcilably opposed to each other, a model that implies that workers should always be hostile to capitalism and capitalists. If this model is correct and if capitalism nevertheless survives in its democratic form, it must be the result of the activities of some institutions, typically thought to be the state, which provide physical repression, ideological domination, cooptation of workers' leaders, or whatever else is necessary to perpetuate capitalism in the face of the permanent threat posed by workers.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926091958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926091958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511619793.004

    DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511619793.004

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9780521886888

    SP - 18

    EP - 57

    BT - Selected Works of Michael Wallerstein: The Political Economy of Inequality, Unions, and Social Democracy

    PB - Cambridge University Press

    ER -