The Smoking Effects Questionnaire for adult populations: Development and psychometric properties

Damaris J. Rohsenow, David Abrams, Peter M. Monti, Suzanne M. Colby, Rosemarie Martin, Raymond Niaura

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Outcome expectancies are central to a social learning model of smoking and of smoking cessation. The Smoking Effects Questionnaire (SEQ) was developed for use in general adult populations. Items were administered to 257 smokers and ex-smokers including worksite employees, hospital visitors, and clients entering smoking cessation treatment. Principal components analysis (PCA) found seven components with good reliability that were reduced into scales of four or five items each with internal consistencies above α=.80. The final measure has 33 items. The scales were divided by secondary factor analysis into three negative effect and four positive effect scales. The SEQ showed good construct and concurrent validity in comparison with measures of similar constructs and with other smoking variables. Women expected fewer negative physical effects and attributed more importance to positive stimulating effects from smoking but otherwise were comparable to men in expected effects of smoking. More dependent smokers ascribed more importance to negative physical effects and positive stimulating effects than did less dependent smokers but did not differ significantly on other expectancy domains. Both true/false scoring and importance ratings of effects produced mostly comparable results so that either scoring method could be used. Treatment implications were discussed. This brief scale is likely to be useful in a variety of research and clinical settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1257-1270
Number of pages14
JournalAddictive Behaviors
Volume28
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Factor analysis
Psychometrics
Principal component analysis
Smoking
Personnel
Population
Smoking Cessation
Withholding Treatment
Principal Component Analysis
Workplace
Statistical Factor Analysis
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research Design
Research

Keywords

  • Smoking expectancies
  • Tobacco effects

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Toxicology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

The Smoking Effects Questionnaire for adult populations : Development and psychometric properties. / Rohsenow, Damaris J.; Abrams, David; Monti, Peter M.; Colby, Suzanne M.; Martin, Rosemarie; Niaura, Raymond.

In: Addictive Behaviors, Vol. 28, No. 7, 2003, p. 1257-1270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rohsenow, Damaris J. ; Abrams, David ; Monti, Peter M. ; Colby, Suzanne M. ; Martin, Rosemarie ; Niaura, Raymond. / The Smoking Effects Questionnaire for adult populations : Development and psychometric properties. In: Addictive Behaviors. 2003 ; Vol. 28, No. 7. pp. 1257-1270.
@article{6afdaad5e92a4818be724d9ec3a0e130,
title = "The Smoking Effects Questionnaire for adult populations: Development and psychometric properties",
abstract = "Outcome expectancies are central to a social learning model of smoking and of smoking cessation. The Smoking Effects Questionnaire (SEQ) was developed for use in general adult populations. Items were administered to 257 smokers and ex-smokers including worksite employees, hospital visitors, and clients entering smoking cessation treatment. Principal components analysis (PCA) found seven components with good reliability that were reduced into scales of four or five items each with internal consistencies above α=.80. The final measure has 33 items. The scales were divided by secondary factor analysis into three negative effect and four positive effect scales. The SEQ showed good construct and concurrent validity in comparison with measures of similar constructs and with other smoking variables. Women expected fewer negative physical effects and attributed more importance to positive stimulating effects from smoking but otherwise were comparable to men in expected effects of smoking. More dependent smokers ascribed more importance to negative physical effects and positive stimulating effects than did less dependent smokers but did not differ significantly on other expectancy domains. Both true/false scoring and importance ratings of effects produced mostly comparable results so that either scoring method could be used. Treatment implications were discussed. This brief scale is likely to be useful in a variety of research and clinical settings.",
keywords = "Smoking expectancies, Tobacco effects",
author = "Rohsenow, {Damaris J.} and David Abrams and Monti, {Peter M.} and Colby, {Suzanne M.} and Rosemarie Martin and Raymond Niaura",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00254-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "1257--1270",
journal = "Addictive Behaviors",
issn = "0306-4603",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Smoking Effects Questionnaire for adult populations

T2 - Development and psychometric properties

AU - Rohsenow, Damaris J.

AU - Abrams, David

AU - Monti, Peter M.

AU - Colby, Suzanne M.

AU - Martin, Rosemarie

AU - Niaura, Raymond

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Outcome expectancies are central to a social learning model of smoking and of smoking cessation. The Smoking Effects Questionnaire (SEQ) was developed for use in general adult populations. Items were administered to 257 smokers and ex-smokers including worksite employees, hospital visitors, and clients entering smoking cessation treatment. Principal components analysis (PCA) found seven components with good reliability that were reduced into scales of four or five items each with internal consistencies above α=.80. The final measure has 33 items. The scales were divided by secondary factor analysis into three negative effect and four positive effect scales. The SEQ showed good construct and concurrent validity in comparison with measures of similar constructs and with other smoking variables. Women expected fewer negative physical effects and attributed more importance to positive stimulating effects from smoking but otherwise were comparable to men in expected effects of smoking. More dependent smokers ascribed more importance to negative physical effects and positive stimulating effects than did less dependent smokers but did not differ significantly on other expectancy domains. Both true/false scoring and importance ratings of effects produced mostly comparable results so that either scoring method could be used. Treatment implications were discussed. This brief scale is likely to be useful in a variety of research and clinical settings.

AB - Outcome expectancies are central to a social learning model of smoking and of smoking cessation. The Smoking Effects Questionnaire (SEQ) was developed for use in general adult populations. Items were administered to 257 smokers and ex-smokers including worksite employees, hospital visitors, and clients entering smoking cessation treatment. Principal components analysis (PCA) found seven components with good reliability that were reduced into scales of four or five items each with internal consistencies above α=.80. The final measure has 33 items. The scales were divided by secondary factor analysis into three negative effect and four positive effect scales. The SEQ showed good construct and concurrent validity in comparison with measures of similar constructs and with other smoking variables. Women expected fewer negative physical effects and attributed more importance to positive stimulating effects from smoking but otherwise were comparable to men in expected effects of smoking. More dependent smokers ascribed more importance to negative physical effects and positive stimulating effects than did less dependent smokers but did not differ significantly on other expectancy domains. Both true/false scoring and importance ratings of effects produced mostly comparable results so that either scoring method could be used. Treatment implications were discussed. This brief scale is likely to be useful in a variety of research and clinical settings.

KW - Smoking expectancies

KW - Tobacco effects

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042159988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042159988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00254-X

DO - 10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00254-X

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 1257

EP - 1270

JO - Addictive Behaviors

JF - Addictive Behaviors

SN - 0306-4603

IS - 7

ER -