The Shadow of Democracy

Rebecca Karl

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    It is next to impossible to write today, now, in this fraught historical moment about the May Fourth Movement and its centenary with anything other than sheer astonishment - still! - over the number of different sorts of people in China who organized themselves at that time, and who, in the extended process of self-organization, articulated - however inchoately and sometimes even incoherently - an intellectual and activist program of resistance and opposition to the corrupt domestic governmental systems, global institutions, local organizations, and specific individuals who were betraying the very principles of democracy and sovereignty that were supposed to be upheld. The betrayal of democratic and sovereign principles was part of an ongoing process of the elaboration of an establishment political position exercised by and through the wished-for domination of political and economic possibility by the powerful and by those who strove for power. As that process of imperialist-colonial expansion along with anti-democratic state-formation and sociocultural hegemonizing - sometimes in tandem with one another, and sometimes separately - became ever more evident, an increasingly vocal opposition posed itself as an active political force and not merely as a detached or abstract form of remonstrance. Through their activist political interventions and in the ensuing contingent realization of an incipient mass movement - incomplete, urban-based, and often elitist, to be sure - a new political consciousness and a new political discourse arose: a consciousness and discourse of the possibilities of and in mass mobilization, of a political practice of mass democracy. The May Fourth Movement, in its temporal proximity to and political juxtaposition with the Korean and Indian movements of the same year, and in the political space created by the ongoing revolution in Russia, helped constitute a world historical moment. That protracted moment can be seen as the inflection of the forces of global capitalism and imperialism into modern historical consciousness and political activism in China, as elsewhere.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)379-387
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Asian Studies
    Volume78
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 1 2019

    Fingerprint

    democracy
    opposition
    political consciousness
    historical consciousness
    political intervention
    mass movement
    China
    self-organization
    discourse
    imperialism
    state formation
    domination
    sovereignty
    consciousness
    mobilization
    capitalist society
    Russia
    economics
    Democracy
    time

    Keywords

    • China
    • cultural revolution
    • democracy
    • internationalism
    • mass activism
    • May Fourth Movement
    • politics

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Cultural Studies
    • History

    Cite this

    The Shadow of Democracy. / Karl, Rebecca.

    In: Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 78, No. 2, 01.05.2019, p. 379-387.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Karl, Rebecca. / The Shadow of Democracy. In: Journal of Asian Studies. 2019 ; Vol. 78, No. 2. pp. 379-387.
    @article{8eb6711102bd4a9da8a0be8ac3bb93ae,
    title = "The Shadow of Democracy",
    abstract = "It is next to impossible to write today, now, in this fraught historical moment about the May Fourth Movement and its centenary with anything other than sheer astonishment - still! - over the number of different sorts of people in China who organized themselves at that time, and who, in the extended process of self-organization, articulated - however inchoately and sometimes even incoherently - an intellectual and activist program of resistance and opposition to the corrupt domestic governmental systems, global institutions, local organizations, and specific individuals who were betraying the very principles of democracy and sovereignty that were supposed to be upheld. The betrayal of democratic and sovereign principles was part of an ongoing process of the elaboration of an establishment political position exercised by and through the wished-for domination of political and economic possibility by the powerful and by those who strove for power. As that process of imperialist-colonial expansion along with anti-democratic state-formation and sociocultural hegemonizing - sometimes in tandem with one another, and sometimes separately - became ever more evident, an increasingly vocal opposition posed itself as an active political force and not merely as a detached or abstract form of remonstrance. Through their activist political interventions and in the ensuing contingent realization of an incipient mass movement - incomplete, urban-based, and often elitist, to be sure - a new political consciousness and a new political discourse arose: a consciousness and discourse of the possibilities of and in mass mobilization, of a political practice of mass democracy. The May Fourth Movement, in its temporal proximity to and political juxtaposition with the Korean and Indian movements of the same year, and in the political space created by the ongoing revolution in Russia, helped constitute a world historical moment. That protracted moment can be seen as the inflection of the forces of global capitalism and imperialism into modern historical consciousness and political activism in China, as elsewhere.",
    keywords = "China, cultural revolution, democracy, internationalism, mass activism, May Fourth Movement, politics",
    author = "Rebecca Karl",
    year = "2019",
    month = "5",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1017/S0021911819000056",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "78",
    pages = "379--387",
    journal = "Journal of Asian Studies",
    issn = "0021-9118",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Shadow of Democracy

    AU - Karl, Rebecca

    PY - 2019/5/1

    Y1 - 2019/5/1

    N2 - It is next to impossible to write today, now, in this fraught historical moment about the May Fourth Movement and its centenary with anything other than sheer astonishment - still! - over the number of different sorts of people in China who organized themselves at that time, and who, in the extended process of self-organization, articulated - however inchoately and sometimes even incoherently - an intellectual and activist program of resistance and opposition to the corrupt domestic governmental systems, global institutions, local organizations, and specific individuals who were betraying the very principles of democracy and sovereignty that were supposed to be upheld. The betrayal of democratic and sovereign principles was part of an ongoing process of the elaboration of an establishment political position exercised by and through the wished-for domination of political and economic possibility by the powerful and by those who strove for power. As that process of imperialist-colonial expansion along with anti-democratic state-formation and sociocultural hegemonizing - sometimes in tandem with one another, and sometimes separately - became ever more evident, an increasingly vocal opposition posed itself as an active political force and not merely as a detached or abstract form of remonstrance. Through their activist political interventions and in the ensuing contingent realization of an incipient mass movement - incomplete, urban-based, and often elitist, to be sure - a new political consciousness and a new political discourse arose: a consciousness and discourse of the possibilities of and in mass mobilization, of a political practice of mass democracy. The May Fourth Movement, in its temporal proximity to and political juxtaposition with the Korean and Indian movements of the same year, and in the political space created by the ongoing revolution in Russia, helped constitute a world historical moment. That protracted moment can be seen as the inflection of the forces of global capitalism and imperialism into modern historical consciousness and political activism in China, as elsewhere.

    AB - It is next to impossible to write today, now, in this fraught historical moment about the May Fourth Movement and its centenary with anything other than sheer astonishment - still! - over the number of different sorts of people in China who organized themselves at that time, and who, in the extended process of self-organization, articulated - however inchoately and sometimes even incoherently - an intellectual and activist program of resistance and opposition to the corrupt domestic governmental systems, global institutions, local organizations, and specific individuals who were betraying the very principles of democracy and sovereignty that were supposed to be upheld. The betrayal of democratic and sovereign principles was part of an ongoing process of the elaboration of an establishment political position exercised by and through the wished-for domination of political and economic possibility by the powerful and by those who strove for power. As that process of imperialist-colonial expansion along with anti-democratic state-formation and sociocultural hegemonizing - sometimes in tandem with one another, and sometimes separately - became ever more evident, an increasingly vocal opposition posed itself as an active political force and not merely as a detached or abstract form of remonstrance. Through their activist political interventions and in the ensuing contingent realization of an incipient mass movement - incomplete, urban-based, and often elitist, to be sure - a new political consciousness and a new political discourse arose: a consciousness and discourse of the possibilities of and in mass mobilization, of a political practice of mass democracy. The May Fourth Movement, in its temporal proximity to and political juxtaposition with the Korean and Indian movements of the same year, and in the political space created by the ongoing revolution in Russia, helped constitute a world historical moment. That protracted moment can be seen as the inflection of the forces of global capitalism and imperialism into modern historical consciousness and political activism in China, as elsewhere.

    KW - China

    KW - cultural revolution

    KW - democracy

    KW - internationalism

    KW - mass activism

    KW - May Fourth Movement

    KW - politics

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065568587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065568587&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/S0021911819000056

    DO - 10.1017/S0021911819000056

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 78

    SP - 379

    EP - 387

    JO - Journal of Asian Studies

    JF - Journal of Asian Studies

    SN - 0021-9118

    IS - 2

    ER -