The sexual double standard and gender differences in attitudes toward casual sex among U.S. university students

Paula England, Jonathan Bearak

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Background: A significant portion of premarital sexual activity is casual rather than in relationships, and commentators disagree on whether this is what women prefer. Objective: We examine gender differences in attitudes toward casual sex. We also assess whether there is a double standard whereby women are judged more harshly for casual sex. Methods: We use a large online survey of U.S. university students to examine gender differences with regard to attitudes and reports of sexual behavior. Results: While distributions overlap, the average man looks more favorably on casual sex than the average woman. Both sexes show substantial openness to relationships. We find evidence of a double standard: men are more judgmental toward women than toward men who have casual sex. Men appear to over-report and/or women to under-report intercourse and fellatio, suggesting that men see these acts as enhancing and/or women see them as diminishing their status. Conclusions: Women face more negative judgment than men when they are known to engage in casual sex, and they also report less interest in casual sex than men. Our analysis does not permit us to assess whether the double standard we find evidence of explains why women have less interest in casual sex, but we hypothesize that this is the case.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1327-1338
    Number of pages12
    JournalDemographic Research
    Volume30
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    gender-specific factors
    university
    student
    online survey
    evidence

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Demography

    Cite this

    The sexual double standard and gender differences in attitudes toward casual sex among U.S. university students. / England, Paula; Bearak, Jonathan.

    In: Demographic Research, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2014, p. 1327-1338.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{e6ddf8e80d98449d9550c82e25ddc27b,
    title = "The sexual double standard and gender differences in attitudes toward casual sex among U.S. university students",
    abstract = "Background: A significant portion of premarital sexual activity is casual rather than in relationships, and commentators disagree on whether this is what women prefer. Objective: We examine gender differences in attitudes toward casual sex. We also assess whether there is a double standard whereby women are judged more harshly for casual sex. Methods: We use a large online survey of U.S. university students to examine gender differences with regard to attitudes and reports of sexual behavior. Results: While distributions overlap, the average man looks more favorably on casual sex than the average woman. Both sexes show substantial openness to relationships. We find evidence of a double standard: men are more judgmental toward women than toward men who have casual sex. Men appear to over-report and/or women to under-report intercourse and fellatio, suggesting that men see these acts as enhancing and/or women see them as diminishing their status. Conclusions: Women face more negative judgment than men when they are known to engage in casual sex, and they also report less interest in casual sex than men. Our analysis does not permit us to assess whether the double standard we find evidence of explains why women have less interest in casual sex, but we hypothesize that this is the case.",
    author = "Paula England and Jonathan Bearak",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.46",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "30",
    pages = "1327--1338",
    journal = "Demographic Research",
    issn = "1435-9871",
    publisher = "Max-Planck Institute for Demographic Research/Max-Planck-institut fur Demografische Forschung",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The sexual double standard and gender differences in attitudes toward casual sex among U.S. university students

    AU - England, Paula

    AU - Bearak, Jonathan

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Background: A significant portion of premarital sexual activity is casual rather than in relationships, and commentators disagree on whether this is what women prefer. Objective: We examine gender differences in attitudes toward casual sex. We also assess whether there is a double standard whereby women are judged more harshly for casual sex. Methods: We use a large online survey of U.S. university students to examine gender differences with regard to attitudes and reports of sexual behavior. Results: While distributions overlap, the average man looks more favorably on casual sex than the average woman. Both sexes show substantial openness to relationships. We find evidence of a double standard: men are more judgmental toward women than toward men who have casual sex. Men appear to over-report and/or women to under-report intercourse and fellatio, suggesting that men see these acts as enhancing and/or women see them as diminishing their status. Conclusions: Women face more negative judgment than men when they are known to engage in casual sex, and they also report less interest in casual sex than men. Our analysis does not permit us to assess whether the double standard we find evidence of explains why women have less interest in casual sex, but we hypothesize that this is the case.

    AB - Background: A significant portion of premarital sexual activity is casual rather than in relationships, and commentators disagree on whether this is what women prefer. Objective: We examine gender differences in attitudes toward casual sex. We also assess whether there is a double standard whereby women are judged more harshly for casual sex. Methods: We use a large online survey of U.S. university students to examine gender differences with regard to attitudes and reports of sexual behavior. Results: While distributions overlap, the average man looks more favorably on casual sex than the average woman. Both sexes show substantial openness to relationships. We find evidence of a double standard: men are more judgmental toward women than toward men who have casual sex. Men appear to over-report and/or women to under-report intercourse and fellatio, suggesting that men see these acts as enhancing and/or women see them as diminishing their status. Conclusions: Women face more negative judgment than men when they are known to engage in casual sex, and they also report less interest in casual sex than men. Our analysis does not permit us to assess whether the double standard we find evidence of explains why women have less interest in casual sex, but we hypothesize that this is the case.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902509169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902509169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.46

    DO - 10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.46

    M3 - Article

    VL - 30

    SP - 1327

    EP - 1338

    JO - Demographic Research

    JF - Demographic Research

    SN - 1435-9871

    IS - 1

    ER -