The semantics of success: Do masturbation exercises lead to partner orgasm?

Jerome C. Wakefield

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Do masturbation exercises assigned in preorgasmic women’s groups enable previously nonorgasmic women to achieve orgasms during partner sex? Studies by Wallace and Barbach1 and Ersner-Hershfield and Kopel2 report encouraging partner orgasmic success rates of 87% and 82%, respectively, and these figures are commonly cited in reviews of the literature. I argue that these rates are misleading because they reflect overly liberal research definitions of “nonorgasmic,” “orgasmic success, ” and “partner orgasm.” A reanalysis of Ersner-Hershfield and Kopel’s data using more stringent and intuitive criteria yields a partner success rate at 10 weeks after termination of 20% (or 47%, if women who require the use of a vibrator to have orgasm during partner sex are included as successes), as opposed to their original figure of 82%. These results suggest that masturbation training in preorgasmic womens groups is not the treatment of choice for most previously nonorgasmic women seeking partner orgasm. They also illustrate how different ideological conceptions of the meaning of sex can lead to different definitions of outcome categories and different evaluations of the same data.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)3-14
    Number of pages12
    JournalJournal of Sex and Marital Therapy
    Volume13
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 1987

    Fingerprint

    Masturbation
    Orgasm
    Semantics
    Exercise
    Research

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Clinical Psychology

    Cite this

    The semantics of success : Do masturbation exercises lead to partner orgasm? / Wakefield, Jerome C.

    In: Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.01.1987, p. 3-14.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{159c57aa155d4887bf820bf864997e0b,
    title = "The semantics of success: Do masturbation exercises lead to partner orgasm?",
    abstract = "Do masturbation exercises assigned in preorgasmic women’s groups enable previously nonorgasmic women to achieve orgasms during partner sex? Studies by Wallace and Barbach1 and Ersner-Hershfield and Kopel2 report encouraging partner orgasmic success rates of 87{\%} and 82{\%}, respectively, and these figures are commonly cited in reviews of the literature. I argue that these rates are misleading because they reflect overly liberal research definitions of “nonorgasmic,” “orgasmic success, ” and “partner orgasm.” A reanalysis of Ersner-Hershfield and Kopel’s data using more stringent and intuitive criteria yields a partner success rate at 10 weeks after termination of 20{\%} (or 47{\%}, if women who require the use of a vibrator to have orgasm during partner sex are included as successes), as opposed to their original figure of 82{\%}. These results suggest that masturbation training in preorgasmic womens groups is not the treatment of choice for most previously nonorgasmic women seeking partner orgasm. They also illustrate how different ideological conceptions of the meaning of sex can lead to different definitions of outcome categories and different evaluations of the same data.",
    author = "Wakefield, {Jerome C.}",
    year = "1987",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1080/00926238708403874",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "3--14",
    journal = "Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy",
    issn = "0092-623X",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The semantics of success

    T2 - Do masturbation exercises lead to partner orgasm?

    AU - Wakefield, Jerome C.

    PY - 1987/1/1

    Y1 - 1987/1/1

    N2 - Do masturbation exercises assigned in preorgasmic women’s groups enable previously nonorgasmic women to achieve orgasms during partner sex? Studies by Wallace and Barbach1 and Ersner-Hershfield and Kopel2 report encouraging partner orgasmic success rates of 87% and 82%, respectively, and these figures are commonly cited in reviews of the literature. I argue that these rates are misleading because they reflect overly liberal research definitions of “nonorgasmic,” “orgasmic success, ” and “partner orgasm.” A reanalysis of Ersner-Hershfield and Kopel’s data using more stringent and intuitive criteria yields a partner success rate at 10 weeks after termination of 20% (or 47%, if women who require the use of a vibrator to have orgasm during partner sex are included as successes), as opposed to their original figure of 82%. These results suggest that masturbation training in preorgasmic womens groups is not the treatment of choice for most previously nonorgasmic women seeking partner orgasm. They also illustrate how different ideological conceptions of the meaning of sex can lead to different definitions of outcome categories and different evaluations of the same data.

    AB - Do masturbation exercises assigned in preorgasmic women’s groups enable previously nonorgasmic women to achieve orgasms during partner sex? Studies by Wallace and Barbach1 and Ersner-Hershfield and Kopel2 report encouraging partner orgasmic success rates of 87% and 82%, respectively, and these figures are commonly cited in reviews of the literature. I argue that these rates are misleading because they reflect overly liberal research definitions of “nonorgasmic,” “orgasmic success, ” and “partner orgasm.” A reanalysis of Ersner-Hershfield and Kopel’s data using more stringent and intuitive criteria yields a partner success rate at 10 weeks after termination of 20% (or 47%, if women who require the use of a vibrator to have orgasm during partner sex are included as successes), as opposed to their original figure of 82%. These results suggest that masturbation training in preorgasmic womens groups is not the treatment of choice for most previously nonorgasmic women seeking partner orgasm. They also illustrate how different ideological conceptions of the meaning of sex can lead to different definitions of outcome categories and different evaluations of the same data.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023126321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023126321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/00926238708403874

    DO - 10.1080/00926238708403874

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 3573050

    AN - SCOPUS:0023126321

    VL - 13

    SP - 3

    EP - 14

    JO - Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy

    JF - Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy

    SN - 0092-623X

    IS - 1

    ER -