The self: Clues from the brain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Can we find a way of thinking about the self that is compatible with modern neuroscience? I think we can. First of all, we have to recognize that "the self" is not the same as "the conscious self," since much of who we are as individuals takes place out of conscious awareness. Second, we have to accept that some aspects of the self, especially the unconscious aspects, occur in and can be studied in other species, allowing us to relate these aspects of the self to detailed brain mechanisms. Finally, it also helps to think of the self in terms of memory. Obviously, much of who we are is based on memories learned through personal experience, including both conscious or explicit memories and unconscious or implicit memories. This is particularly important since much progress has been made in relating memory to the cells and synapses of the brain. By viewing the self as a network of memories the effort to relate the self to the brain can build on this progress. Emphasizing memory and experience does not take away from the fact that our genetic history also contributes to who we are. In fact, genes and experience, or nature and nurture, are, in the end, not different things, but different ways of doing the same thing - wiring the synapses of our brain. In many ways, the self is synaptic. This synaptic view of the self is not meant as a challenge to other views, such as spiritual, cultural, or psychological views. It is instead, just a way of understanding how these other aspects of who we are relate, deep down, to the brain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)295-304
Number of pages10
JournalAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Volume1001
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003

Fingerprint

Ego
Brain
Data storage equipment
Synapses
Electric wiring
Neurosciences
Genes
History
Psychology

Keywords

  • Brain
  • Consciousness
  • Genes
  • Learning
  • Memory
  • Neurons
  • Personality
  • Self
  • Synapses
  • Unconscious

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

The self : Clues from the brain. / Ledoux, Joseph.

In: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1001, 2003, p. 295-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{701439e39a114f3f9c135cf272f6d6e6,
title = "The self: Clues from the brain",
abstract = "Can we find a way of thinking about the self that is compatible with modern neuroscience? I think we can. First of all, we have to recognize that {"}the self{"} is not the same as {"}the conscious self,{"} since much of who we are as individuals takes place out of conscious awareness. Second, we have to accept that some aspects of the self, especially the unconscious aspects, occur in and can be studied in other species, allowing us to relate these aspects of the self to detailed brain mechanisms. Finally, it also helps to think of the self in terms of memory. Obviously, much of who we are is based on memories learned through personal experience, including both conscious or explicit memories and unconscious or implicit memories. This is particularly important since much progress has been made in relating memory to the cells and synapses of the brain. By viewing the self as a network of memories the effort to relate the self to the brain can build on this progress. Emphasizing memory and experience does not take away from the fact that our genetic history also contributes to who we are. In fact, genes and experience, or nature and nurture, are, in the end, not different things, but different ways of doing the same thing - wiring the synapses of our brain. In many ways, the self is synaptic. This synaptic view of the self is not meant as a challenge to other views, such as spiritual, cultural, or psychological views. It is instead, just a way of understanding how these other aspects of who we are relate, deep down, to the brain.",
keywords = "Brain, Consciousness, Genes, Learning, Memory, Neurons, Personality, Self, Synapses, Unconscious",
author = "Joseph Ledoux",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1196/annals.1279.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1001",
pages = "295--304",
journal = "Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences",
issn = "0077-8923",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The self

T2 - Clues from the brain

AU - Ledoux, Joseph

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Can we find a way of thinking about the self that is compatible with modern neuroscience? I think we can. First of all, we have to recognize that "the self" is not the same as "the conscious self," since much of who we are as individuals takes place out of conscious awareness. Second, we have to accept that some aspects of the self, especially the unconscious aspects, occur in and can be studied in other species, allowing us to relate these aspects of the self to detailed brain mechanisms. Finally, it also helps to think of the self in terms of memory. Obviously, much of who we are is based on memories learned through personal experience, including both conscious or explicit memories and unconscious or implicit memories. This is particularly important since much progress has been made in relating memory to the cells and synapses of the brain. By viewing the self as a network of memories the effort to relate the self to the brain can build on this progress. Emphasizing memory and experience does not take away from the fact that our genetic history also contributes to who we are. In fact, genes and experience, or nature and nurture, are, in the end, not different things, but different ways of doing the same thing - wiring the synapses of our brain. In many ways, the self is synaptic. This synaptic view of the self is not meant as a challenge to other views, such as spiritual, cultural, or psychological views. It is instead, just a way of understanding how these other aspects of who we are relate, deep down, to the brain.

AB - Can we find a way of thinking about the self that is compatible with modern neuroscience? I think we can. First of all, we have to recognize that "the self" is not the same as "the conscious self," since much of who we are as individuals takes place out of conscious awareness. Second, we have to accept that some aspects of the self, especially the unconscious aspects, occur in and can be studied in other species, allowing us to relate these aspects of the self to detailed brain mechanisms. Finally, it also helps to think of the self in terms of memory. Obviously, much of who we are is based on memories learned through personal experience, including both conscious or explicit memories and unconscious or implicit memories. This is particularly important since much progress has been made in relating memory to the cells and synapses of the brain. By viewing the self as a network of memories the effort to relate the self to the brain can build on this progress. Emphasizing memory and experience does not take away from the fact that our genetic history also contributes to who we are. In fact, genes and experience, or nature and nurture, are, in the end, not different things, but different ways of doing the same thing - wiring the synapses of our brain. In many ways, the self is synaptic. This synaptic view of the self is not meant as a challenge to other views, such as spiritual, cultural, or psychological views. It is instead, just a way of understanding how these other aspects of who we are relate, deep down, to the brain.

KW - Brain

KW - Consciousness

KW - Genes

KW - Learning

KW - Memory

KW - Neurons

KW - Personality

KW - Self

KW - Synapses

KW - Unconscious

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1942538442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1942538442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1196/annals.1279.017

DO - 10.1196/annals.1279.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 14625368

AN - SCOPUS:1942538442

VL - 1001

SP - 295

EP - 304

JO - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

JF - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

SN - 0077-8923

ER -