The scope of linguistic generalizations: Evidence from Hebrew word formation

Iris Berent, Gary F. Marcus, Joseph Shimron, Adamantios I. Gafos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Does the productive use of language stem from the manipulation of mental variables (e.g. "noun", "any consonant")? If linguistic constraints appeal to variables, rather than instances (e.g. "dog", "m"), then they should generalize to any representable novel instance, including instances that fall beyond the phonological space of a language. We test this prediction by investigating a constraint on the structure of Hebrew roots. Hebrew frequently exhibits geminates (e.g. ss) in its roots, but it strictly constraints their location: geminates are frequent at the end of the root (e.g. mss), but rare at its beginning (e.g. ssm). Symbolic accounts capture the ban on root-initial geminates as *XXY, where X and Y are variables that stand for any two distinct consonants. If the constraint on root structure appeals to the identity of abstract variables, then speakers should be able to extend it to root geminates with foreign phonemes, including phonemes with foreign feature values. We present findings from three experiments supporting this prediction. These results suggest that a complete account of linguistic processing must incorporate mechanisms for generalization outside the representational space of trained items. Mentally-represented variables would allow speakers to make such generalizations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-139
Number of pages27
JournalCognition
Volume83
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Linguistics
Language
linguistics
appeal
evidence
Dogs
ban
language
manipulation
experiment
Word Formation
Values
Geminate
Consonant
Phoneme
Prediction

Keywords

  • Hebrew word formation
  • Language
  • Linguistic generalizations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

The scope of linguistic generalizations : Evidence from Hebrew word formation. / Berent, Iris; Marcus, Gary F.; Shimron, Joseph; Gafos, Adamantios I.

In: Cognition, Vol. 83, No. 2, 2002, p. 113-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berent, I, Marcus, GF, Shimron, J & Gafos, AI 2002, 'The scope of linguistic generalizations: Evidence from Hebrew word formation', Cognition, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 113-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00167-6
Berent, Iris ; Marcus, Gary F. ; Shimron, Joseph ; Gafos, Adamantios I. / The scope of linguistic generalizations : Evidence from Hebrew word formation. In: Cognition. 2002 ; Vol. 83, No. 2. pp. 113-139.
@article{0e9f6a4e05b046809155ed8a0f1486e5,
title = "The scope of linguistic generalizations: Evidence from Hebrew word formation",
abstract = "Does the productive use of language stem from the manipulation of mental variables (e.g. {"}noun{"}, {"}any consonant{"})? If linguistic constraints appeal to variables, rather than instances (e.g. {"}dog{"}, {"}m{"}), then they should generalize to any representable novel instance, including instances that fall beyond the phonological space of a language. We test this prediction by investigating a constraint on the structure of Hebrew roots. Hebrew frequently exhibits geminates (e.g. ss) in its roots, but it strictly constraints their location: geminates are frequent at the end of the root (e.g. mss), but rare at its beginning (e.g. ssm). Symbolic accounts capture the ban on root-initial geminates as *XXY, where X and Y are variables that stand for any two distinct consonants. If the constraint on root structure appeals to the identity of abstract variables, then speakers should be able to extend it to root geminates with foreign phonemes, including phonemes with foreign feature values. We present findings from three experiments supporting this prediction. These results suggest that a complete account of linguistic processing must incorporate mechanisms for generalization outside the representational space of trained items. Mentally-represented variables would allow speakers to make such generalizations.",
keywords = "Hebrew word formation, Language, Linguistic generalizations",
author = "Iris Berent and Marcus, {Gary F.} and Joseph Shimron and Gafos, {Adamantios I.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00167-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "113--139",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The scope of linguistic generalizations

T2 - Evidence from Hebrew word formation

AU - Berent, Iris

AU - Marcus, Gary F.

AU - Shimron, Joseph

AU - Gafos, Adamantios I.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Does the productive use of language stem from the manipulation of mental variables (e.g. "noun", "any consonant")? If linguistic constraints appeal to variables, rather than instances (e.g. "dog", "m"), then they should generalize to any representable novel instance, including instances that fall beyond the phonological space of a language. We test this prediction by investigating a constraint on the structure of Hebrew roots. Hebrew frequently exhibits geminates (e.g. ss) in its roots, but it strictly constraints their location: geminates are frequent at the end of the root (e.g. mss), but rare at its beginning (e.g. ssm). Symbolic accounts capture the ban on root-initial geminates as *XXY, where X and Y are variables that stand for any two distinct consonants. If the constraint on root structure appeals to the identity of abstract variables, then speakers should be able to extend it to root geminates with foreign phonemes, including phonemes with foreign feature values. We present findings from three experiments supporting this prediction. These results suggest that a complete account of linguistic processing must incorporate mechanisms for generalization outside the representational space of trained items. Mentally-represented variables would allow speakers to make such generalizations.

AB - Does the productive use of language stem from the manipulation of mental variables (e.g. "noun", "any consonant")? If linguistic constraints appeal to variables, rather than instances (e.g. "dog", "m"), then they should generalize to any representable novel instance, including instances that fall beyond the phonological space of a language. We test this prediction by investigating a constraint on the structure of Hebrew roots. Hebrew frequently exhibits geminates (e.g. ss) in its roots, but it strictly constraints their location: geminates are frequent at the end of the root (e.g. mss), but rare at its beginning (e.g. ssm). Symbolic accounts capture the ban on root-initial geminates as *XXY, where X and Y are variables that stand for any two distinct consonants. If the constraint on root structure appeals to the identity of abstract variables, then speakers should be able to extend it to root geminates with foreign phonemes, including phonemes with foreign feature values. We present findings from three experiments supporting this prediction. These results suggest that a complete account of linguistic processing must incorporate mechanisms for generalization outside the representational space of trained items. Mentally-represented variables would allow speakers to make such generalizations.

KW - Hebrew word formation

KW - Language

KW - Linguistic generalizations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036178195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036178195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00167-6

DO - 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00167-6

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 113

EP - 139

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

IS - 2

ER -