The Rule of Law and Authoritarian Rule: Legal Politics in Sudan

Sally Merry

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Does the rule of law guarantee peace and democracy, as so many people in the development and governance field believe? What are the historical and sociocultural conditions that shape the way rule of law mechanisms work in practice? Mark Massoud's monograph tracing the changing dimensions of the rule of law in Sudan from its colonial period to the present offers an important perspective on these questions, casting doubt on the simple argument that the rule of law produces democracy and peace. Instead, he shows how colonial and authoritarian rulers used the rule of law to consolidate power and legitimate their rule. In Law's Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian, and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan, Massoud develops the concept of legal politics, arguing that the way the rule of law works varies with the political system in which it is embedded. He concludes that the forms of legal politics that reinforce the power and authority of legal institutions are more likely to sustain an authoritarian state than to bring democratic rule. His analysis is a valuable caution to those who promote the rule of law as the salvation for all. Taking a sociolegal perspective, he shows how it works in practice.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)465-470
    Number of pages6
    JournalLaw and Social Inquiry
    Volume41
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    Sudan
    constitutional state
    politics
    peace
    failed state
    democracy
    political system
    guarantee
    governance
    Law
    present

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Law
    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    The Rule of Law and Authoritarian Rule : Legal Politics in Sudan. / Merry, Sally.

    In: Law and Social Inquiry, Vol. 41, No. 2, 01.03.2016, p. 465-470.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Merry, Sally. / The Rule of Law and Authoritarian Rule : Legal Politics in Sudan. In: Law and Social Inquiry. 2016 ; Vol. 41, No. 2. pp. 465-470.
    @article{f3b558274cae475a9ea83290b6ae84d1,
    title = "The Rule of Law and Authoritarian Rule: Legal Politics in Sudan",
    abstract = "Does the rule of law guarantee peace and democracy, as so many people in the development and governance field believe? What are the historical and sociocultural conditions that shape the way rule of law mechanisms work in practice? Mark Massoud's monograph tracing the changing dimensions of the rule of law in Sudan from its colonial period to the present offers an important perspective on these questions, casting doubt on the simple argument that the rule of law produces democracy and peace. Instead, he shows how colonial and authoritarian rulers used the rule of law to consolidate power and legitimate their rule. In Law's Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian, and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan, Massoud develops the concept of legal politics, arguing that the way the rule of law works varies with the political system in which it is embedded. He concludes that the forms of legal politics that reinforce the power and authority of legal institutions are more likely to sustain an authoritarian state than to bring democratic rule. His analysis is a valuable caution to those who promote the rule of law as the salvation for all. Taking a sociolegal perspective, he shows how it works in practice.",
    author = "Sally Merry",
    year = "2016",
    month = "3",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1111/lsi.12197",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "41",
    pages = "465--470",
    journal = "Law and Social Inquiry",
    issn = "0897-6546",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Rule of Law and Authoritarian Rule

    T2 - Legal Politics in Sudan

    AU - Merry, Sally

    PY - 2016/3/1

    Y1 - 2016/3/1

    N2 - Does the rule of law guarantee peace and democracy, as so many people in the development and governance field believe? What are the historical and sociocultural conditions that shape the way rule of law mechanisms work in practice? Mark Massoud's monograph tracing the changing dimensions of the rule of law in Sudan from its colonial period to the present offers an important perspective on these questions, casting doubt on the simple argument that the rule of law produces democracy and peace. Instead, he shows how colonial and authoritarian rulers used the rule of law to consolidate power and legitimate their rule. In Law's Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian, and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan, Massoud develops the concept of legal politics, arguing that the way the rule of law works varies with the political system in which it is embedded. He concludes that the forms of legal politics that reinforce the power and authority of legal institutions are more likely to sustain an authoritarian state than to bring democratic rule. His analysis is a valuable caution to those who promote the rule of law as the salvation for all. Taking a sociolegal perspective, he shows how it works in practice.

    AB - Does the rule of law guarantee peace and democracy, as so many people in the development and governance field believe? What are the historical and sociocultural conditions that shape the way rule of law mechanisms work in practice? Mark Massoud's monograph tracing the changing dimensions of the rule of law in Sudan from its colonial period to the present offers an important perspective on these questions, casting doubt on the simple argument that the rule of law produces democracy and peace. Instead, he shows how colonial and authoritarian rulers used the rule of law to consolidate power and legitimate their rule. In Law's Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian, and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan, Massoud develops the concept of legal politics, arguing that the way the rule of law works varies with the political system in which it is embedded. He concludes that the forms of legal politics that reinforce the power and authority of legal institutions are more likely to sustain an authoritarian state than to bring democratic rule. His analysis is a valuable caution to those who promote the rule of law as the salvation for all. Taking a sociolegal perspective, he shows how it works in practice.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969835783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969835783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/lsi.12197

    DO - 10.1111/lsi.12197

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84969835783

    VL - 41

    SP - 465

    EP - 470

    JO - Law and Social Inquiry

    JF - Law and Social Inquiry

    SN - 0897-6546

    IS - 2

    ER -