The roles of item repetition and position in infants’ abstract rule learning

Christina Schonberg, Gary Marcus, Scott P. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We asked whether 11- and 14- month-old infants’ abstract rule learning, an early form of analogical reasoning, is susceptible to processing constraints imposed by limits in attention and memory for sequence position. We examined 11- and 14- month-old infants’ learning and generalization of abstract repetition rules (“repetition anywhere,” Experiment 1 or “medial repetition,” Experiment 2) and ordering of specific items (edge positions, Experiment 3) in 4-item sequences. Infants were habituated to sequences containing repetition- and/or position-based structure and then tested with “familiar” vs. “novel” (random) sequences composed of new items. Eleven-month-olds (N = 40) failed to learn abstract repetition rules, but 14-month-olds (N = 40) learned rules under both conditions. In Experiment 3, 11-month-olds (N = 20) learned item edge positions in sequences identical to those in Experiment 2. We conclude that infant sequence learning is constrained by item position in similar ways as in adults.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInfant Behavior and Development
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Learning
Generalization (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Abstract rule learning
  • Analogical reasoning
  • Infant learning
  • Perceptual primitives
  • Sequence learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

The roles of item repetition and position in infants’ abstract rule learning. / Schonberg, Christina; Marcus, Gary; Johnson, Scott P.

In: Infant Behavior and Development, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3373177f9920437d8ff02b371c6d2296,
title = "The roles of item repetition and position in infants’ abstract rule learning",
abstract = "We asked whether 11- and 14- month-old infants’ abstract rule learning, an early form of analogical reasoning, is susceptible to processing constraints imposed by limits in attention and memory for sequence position. We examined 11- and 14- month-old infants’ learning and generalization of abstract repetition rules (“repetition anywhere,” Experiment 1 or “medial repetition,” Experiment 2) and ordering of specific items (edge positions, Experiment 3) in 4-item sequences. Infants were habituated to sequences containing repetition- and/or position-based structure and then tested with “familiar” vs. “novel” (random) sequences composed of new items. Eleven-month-olds (N = 40) failed to learn abstract repetition rules, but 14-month-olds (N = 40) learned rules under both conditions. In Experiment 3, 11-month-olds (N = 20) learned item edge positions in sequences identical to those in Experiment 2. We conclude that infant sequence learning is constrained by item position in similar ways as in adults.",
keywords = "Abstract rule learning, Analogical reasoning, Infant learning, Perceptual primitives, Sequence learning",
author = "Christina Schonberg and Gary Marcus and Johnson, {Scott P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.infbeh.2018.08.003",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Infant Behavior and Development",
issn = "0163-6383",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The roles of item repetition and position in infants’ abstract rule learning

AU - Schonberg, Christina

AU - Marcus, Gary

AU - Johnson, Scott P.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - We asked whether 11- and 14- month-old infants’ abstract rule learning, an early form of analogical reasoning, is susceptible to processing constraints imposed by limits in attention and memory for sequence position. We examined 11- and 14- month-old infants’ learning and generalization of abstract repetition rules (“repetition anywhere,” Experiment 1 or “medial repetition,” Experiment 2) and ordering of specific items (edge positions, Experiment 3) in 4-item sequences. Infants were habituated to sequences containing repetition- and/or position-based structure and then tested with “familiar” vs. “novel” (random) sequences composed of new items. Eleven-month-olds (N = 40) failed to learn abstract repetition rules, but 14-month-olds (N = 40) learned rules under both conditions. In Experiment 3, 11-month-olds (N = 20) learned item edge positions in sequences identical to those in Experiment 2. We conclude that infant sequence learning is constrained by item position in similar ways as in adults.

AB - We asked whether 11- and 14- month-old infants’ abstract rule learning, an early form of analogical reasoning, is susceptible to processing constraints imposed by limits in attention and memory for sequence position. We examined 11- and 14- month-old infants’ learning and generalization of abstract repetition rules (“repetition anywhere,” Experiment 1 or “medial repetition,” Experiment 2) and ordering of specific items (edge positions, Experiment 3) in 4-item sequences. Infants were habituated to sequences containing repetition- and/or position-based structure and then tested with “familiar” vs. “novel” (random) sequences composed of new items. Eleven-month-olds (N = 40) failed to learn abstract repetition rules, but 14-month-olds (N = 40) learned rules under both conditions. In Experiment 3, 11-month-olds (N = 20) learned item edge positions in sequences identical to those in Experiment 2. We conclude that infant sequence learning is constrained by item position in similar ways as in adults.

KW - Abstract rule learning

KW - Analogical reasoning

KW - Infant learning

KW - Perceptual primitives

KW - Sequence learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053857104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053857104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.infbeh.2018.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.infbeh.2018.08.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 30262181

AN - SCOPUS:85053857104

JO - Infant Behavior and Development

JF - Infant Behavior and Development

SN - 0163-6383

ER -