The Role of Stigma in Understanding Ethnicity Differences in Authoritarianism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Ethnic minorities often have shown higher mean levels of authoritarianism compared to Whites. However, no theoretical mechanism has been directly tested to explain these ethnicity differences. Using the stigma literature as a framework, two studies are presented that test a novel explanation for this difference, rooted in the devaluing that accompanies being a member of a stigmatized group in society. The results show that, in Study 1, ethnic minorities reported higher levels of authoritarianism in ways that could not be explained by traditional explanations of authoritarianism, including lower income, lower education, or lack of cognitive complexity. However, in Study 2, when participants were given the opportunity to affirm their sense of worth, ethnic minorities did not differ in their mean levels of authoritarianism compared to Whites. These findings are discussed in the context of understanding ethnic minority endorsement of authoritarianism in terms of self-regulatory processes that may be related to their stigmatized condition in society.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)419-438
Number of pages20
JournalPolitical Psychology
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2011

Fingerprint

Authoritarianism
authoritarianism
ethnicity
national minority
low income
Ethnic Groups
Stigma
Education
Ethnic Minorities
lack
education
Group

Keywords

  • Authoritarianism
  • Ethnicity
  • Prejudice
  • Stigma compensation theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Philosophy
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

The Role of Stigma in Understanding Ethnicity Differences in Authoritarianism. / Henry, Pj.

In: Political Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 3, 01.06.2011, p. 419-438.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2ba72c1224c0482cbe3bc90fb8a9c06c,
title = "The Role of Stigma in Understanding Ethnicity Differences in Authoritarianism",
abstract = "Ethnic minorities often have shown higher mean levels of authoritarianism compared to Whites. However, no theoretical mechanism has been directly tested to explain these ethnicity differences. Using the stigma literature as a framework, two studies are presented that test a novel explanation for this difference, rooted in the devaluing that accompanies being a member of a stigmatized group in society. The results show that, in Study 1, ethnic minorities reported higher levels of authoritarianism in ways that could not be explained by traditional explanations of authoritarianism, including lower income, lower education, or lack of cognitive complexity. However, in Study 2, when participants were given the opportunity to affirm their sense of worth, ethnic minorities did not differ in their mean levels of authoritarianism compared to Whites. These findings are discussed in the context of understanding ethnic minority endorsement of authoritarianism in terms of self-regulatory processes that may be related to their stigmatized condition in society.",
keywords = "Authoritarianism, Ethnicity, Prejudice, Stigma compensation theory",
author = "Pj Henry",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00816.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "419--438",
journal = "Political Psychology",
issn = "0162-895X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Role of Stigma in Understanding Ethnicity Differences in Authoritarianism

AU - Henry, Pj

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - Ethnic minorities often have shown higher mean levels of authoritarianism compared to Whites. However, no theoretical mechanism has been directly tested to explain these ethnicity differences. Using the stigma literature as a framework, two studies are presented that test a novel explanation for this difference, rooted in the devaluing that accompanies being a member of a stigmatized group in society. The results show that, in Study 1, ethnic minorities reported higher levels of authoritarianism in ways that could not be explained by traditional explanations of authoritarianism, including lower income, lower education, or lack of cognitive complexity. However, in Study 2, when participants were given the opportunity to affirm their sense of worth, ethnic minorities did not differ in their mean levels of authoritarianism compared to Whites. These findings are discussed in the context of understanding ethnic minority endorsement of authoritarianism in terms of self-regulatory processes that may be related to their stigmatized condition in society.

AB - Ethnic minorities often have shown higher mean levels of authoritarianism compared to Whites. However, no theoretical mechanism has been directly tested to explain these ethnicity differences. Using the stigma literature as a framework, two studies are presented that test a novel explanation for this difference, rooted in the devaluing that accompanies being a member of a stigmatized group in society. The results show that, in Study 1, ethnic minorities reported higher levels of authoritarianism in ways that could not be explained by traditional explanations of authoritarianism, including lower income, lower education, or lack of cognitive complexity. However, in Study 2, when participants were given the opportunity to affirm their sense of worth, ethnic minorities did not differ in their mean levels of authoritarianism compared to Whites. These findings are discussed in the context of understanding ethnic minority endorsement of authoritarianism in terms of self-regulatory processes that may be related to their stigmatized condition in society.

KW - Authoritarianism

KW - Ethnicity

KW - Prejudice

KW - Stigma compensation theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955635193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955635193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00816.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00816.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79955635193

VL - 32

SP - 419

EP - 438

JO - Political Psychology

JF - Political Psychology

SN - 0162-895X

IS - 3

ER -