The role of politics and governance in educational accountability systems

Dominic J. Brewer, Kieran M. Killeen, Richard O. Welsh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This brief utilizes case study methodology to illustrate the role of governance in educational accountability systems. Most research on the effectiveness of such systems has focused on technical components, such as standards-setting, assessments, rewards and sanctions, and data collection and reporting. This brief seeks to demonstrate that this focus may miss the importance of the institutional set-up. We argue that effective accountability systems are largely dependent on associated government structures, rules, and procedures, and the individuals responsible for implementing them. We use an illustrative case from the state of Oklahoma, where a lack of independent oversight, few checks and balances, and little in-state technical capacity combine to call into question the effectiveness of this state's accountability system. We urge researchers and policy makers to focus more attention on the "messy" governance and politics of educational accountability, and conclude the brief with specific policy proposals to strengthen state education accountability systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)378-393
Number of pages16
JournalEducation Finance and Policy
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

governance
responsibility
politics
sanction
reward
lack
methodology
education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

The role of politics and governance in educational accountability systems. / Brewer, Dominic J.; Killeen, Kieran M.; Welsh, Richard O.

In: Education Finance and Policy, Vol. 8, No. 3, 07.2013, p. 378-393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brewer, Dominic J. ; Killeen, Kieran M. ; Welsh, Richard O. / The role of politics and governance in educational accountability systems. In: Education Finance and Policy. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 378-393.
@article{89d4b817d7e74926b84f69e40a25146b,
title = "The role of politics and governance in educational accountability systems",
abstract = "This brief utilizes case study methodology to illustrate the role of governance in educational accountability systems. Most research on the effectiveness of such systems has focused on technical components, such as standards-setting, assessments, rewards and sanctions, and data collection and reporting. This brief seeks to demonstrate that this focus may miss the importance of the institutional set-up. We argue that effective accountability systems are largely dependent on associated government structures, rules, and procedures, and the individuals responsible for implementing them. We use an illustrative case from the state of Oklahoma, where a lack of independent oversight, few checks and balances, and little in-state technical capacity combine to call into question the effectiveness of this state's accountability system. We urge researchers and policy makers to focus more attention on the {"}messy{"} governance and politics of educational accountability, and conclude the brief with specific policy proposals to strengthen state education accountability systems.",
author = "Brewer, {Dominic J.} and Killeen, {Kieran M.} and Welsh, {Richard O.}",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1162/EDFP_a_00102",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "378--393",
journal = "Education Finance and Policy",
issn = "1557-3060",
publisher = "MIT Press Journals",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of politics and governance in educational accountability systems

AU - Brewer, Dominic J.

AU - Killeen, Kieran M.

AU - Welsh, Richard O.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - This brief utilizes case study methodology to illustrate the role of governance in educational accountability systems. Most research on the effectiveness of such systems has focused on technical components, such as standards-setting, assessments, rewards and sanctions, and data collection and reporting. This brief seeks to demonstrate that this focus may miss the importance of the institutional set-up. We argue that effective accountability systems are largely dependent on associated government structures, rules, and procedures, and the individuals responsible for implementing them. We use an illustrative case from the state of Oklahoma, where a lack of independent oversight, few checks and balances, and little in-state technical capacity combine to call into question the effectiveness of this state's accountability system. We urge researchers and policy makers to focus more attention on the "messy" governance and politics of educational accountability, and conclude the brief with specific policy proposals to strengthen state education accountability systems.

AB - This brief utilizes case study methodology to illustrate the role of governance in educational accountability systems. Most research on the effectiveness of such systems has focused on technical components, such as standards-setting, assessments, rewards and sanctions, and data collection and reporting. This brief seeks to demonstrate that this focus may miss the importance of the institutional set-up. We argue that effective accountability systems are largely dependent on associated government structures, rules, and procedures, and the individuals responsible for implementing them. We use an illustrative case from the state of Oklahoma, where a lack of independent oversight, few checks and balances, and little in-state technical capacity combine to call into question the effectiveness of this state's accountability system. We urge researchers and policy makers to focus more attention on the "messy" governance and politics of educational accountability, and conclude the brief with specific policy proposals to strengthen state education accountability systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879980957&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879980957&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1162/EDFP_a_00102

DO - 10.1162/EDFP_a_00102

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 378

EP - 393

JO - Education Finance and Policy

JF - Education Finance and Policy

SN - 1557-3060

IS - 3

ER -