The role of lay beliefs about group transgressions in acceptance of responsibility for ingroup harm-doing

Rezarta Bilali, Yeshim Iqbal, Cengiz Erisen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Denial of responsibility by perpetrator groups is the most common response to group-based transgressions. Refusal to acknowledge responsibility has dire consequences for intergroup relations. In this research we assessed whether shifting lay beliefs about group-based transgressions in general influences acceptance of responsibility for a specific ingroup transgression. In two experimental studies we manipulated lay beliefs about group transgressions as reflecting either a group's stable character (i.e., a global defect construal) or a specific characteristic (i.e., a specific defect construal). Specific defect construals (compared to global defect construals) increased acceptance of ingroup responsibility by increasing group malleability beliefs, but reduced acceptance of ingroup responsibility by reducing the ingroup's perceived moral failure. These effects were moderated by ingroup superiority in Study 1, but not Study 2. We draw implications for our understanding of mechanisms of denial of responsibility, identity threat, and coping with this threat.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Research

Keywords

  • group malleability
  • ingroup responsibility
  • ingroup superiority
  • moral failure
  • transgressions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

@article{43cffb126be941389677f4946c2e8075,
title = "The role of lay beliefs about group transgressions in acceptance of responsibility for ingroup harm-doing",
abstract = "Denial of responsibility by perpetrator groups is the most common response to group-based transgressions. Refusal to acknowledge responsibility has dire consequences for intergroup relations. In this research we assessed whether shifting lay beliefs about group-based transgressions in general influences acceptance of responsibility for a specific ingroup transgression. In two experimental studies we manipulated lay beliefs about group transgressions as reflecting either a group's stable character (i.e., a global defect construal) or a specific characteristic (i.e., a specific defect construal). Specific defect construals (compared to global defect construals) increased acceptance of ingroup responsibility by increasing group malleability beliefs, but reduced acceptance of ingroup responsibility by reducing the ingroup's perceived moral failure. These effects were moderated by ingroup superiority in Study 1, but not Study 2. We draw implications for our understanding of mechanisms of denial of responsibility, identity threat, and coping with this threat.",
keywords = "group malleability, ingroup responsibility, ingroup superiority, moral failure, transgressions",
author = "Rezarta Bilali and Yeshim Iqbal and Cengiz Erisen",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ejsp.2583",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "European Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0046-2772",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of lay beliefs about group transgressions in acceptance of responsibility for ingroup harm-doing

AU - Bilali, Rezarta

AU - Iqbal, Yeshim

AU - Erisen, Cengiz

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Denial of responsibility by perpetrator groups is the most common response to group-based transgressions. Refusal to acknowledge responsibility has dire consequences for intergroup relations. In this research we assessed whether shifting lay beliefs about group-based transgressions in general influences acceptance of responsibility for a specific ingroup transgression. In two experimental studies we manipulated lay beliefs about group transgressions as reflecting either a group's stable character (i.e., a global defect construal) or a specific characteristic (i.e., a specific defect construal). Specific defect construals (compared to global defect construals) increased acceptance of ingroup responsibility by increasing group malleability beliefs, but reduced acceptance of ingroup responsibility by reducing the ingroup's perceived moral failure. These effects were moderated by ingroup superiority in Study 1, but not Study 2. We draw implications for our understanding of mechanisms of denial of responsibility, identity threat, and coping with this threat.

AB - Denial of responsibility by perpetrator groups is the most common response to group-based transgressions. Refusal to acknowledge responsibility has dire consequences for intergroup relations. In this research we assessed whether shifting lay beliefs about group-based transgressions in general influences acceptance of responsibility for a specific ingroup transgression. In two experimental studies we manipulated lay beliefs about group transgressions as reflecting either a group's stable character (i.e., a global defect construal) or a specific characteristic (i.e., a specific defect construal). Specific defect construals (compared to global defect construals) increased acceptance of ingroup responsibility by increasing group malleability beliefs, but reduced acceptance of ingroup responsibility by reducing the ingroup's perceived moral failure. These effects were moderated by ingroup superiority in Study 1, but not Study 2. We draw implications for our understanding of mechanisms of denial of responsibility, identity threat, and coping with this threat.

KW - group malleability

KW - ingroup responsibility

KW - ingroup superiority

KW - moral failure

KW - transgressions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064599523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064599523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.2583

DO - 10.1002/ejsp.2583

M3 - Article

JO - European Journal of Social Psychology

JF - European Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0046-2772

ER -